8/6/23
3 Likes
What is the difference between a napalm attack and this? I think if it was a nuke, there would be dust, not a scar. How are trees growing in Hiroshima today?
Same criminals, relatives or followers, just poisoned how many people across the world? Not all the scars have shown up yet.
It wasn’t Oppenheimer, it was the ones who paid for it who wrought this on the Japanese.
1 Like
Hi Justa, thanks for weighing in. Here’s what I could find initially on the costs of the Manhattan Project. Both the backward and forward reaches of the money trail could be interesting to pursue.
1 Like
My point is that I do not believe they dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan or else the damage would have been eons to recover from, not years. How long did it take for the trees and plants to come back? My parents had friends who worked on the project so I know the project was real- what horrific bombs DID they drop?
4 Likes
Hi, land is your baby, Justa, so I’m wondering … does the “tree regrowth” portion of your analysis hinge on a determination of how much fission material actually could have reached the ground itself? The premise would be the A bombs released on Japan from heights of ~ 600 meters.
I love it!
One reason I prize this site is the alternative thinkers.
What you’ve written never really occurred to me.
I like to think my perspective viewpoints, cover all angles,
Yet here again, I was blindsided by another point-of-view;
I hadn’t seen, or thought about.
Thanks, not only for your viewpoint, but your reasoning as well.
2 Likes
I suggest you look at what they describe as levels of radiation in the patterns which emanate from a “nuclear explosion”. If the people were burned, then the level of radiation was high enough to be enduring. This is a long video, but worth the consideration.
They clearly exist on paper, at least the mathematical analysis, but did they really unleash that monster?
Once you accept the magnitude of the lie, you aren’t afraid to look.
2 Likes
The nucular/thermonucleer “bomb” does seem to resemble a massive( /vast) electrical arcing of some kind coupled with sonon( sonic wavelets) emission.
Is this the reason why they aren’t afraid of using uranium reactors or afraid of spent uranium “fuel” rods? Wouldn’t they otherwise have switched to Thorium/salt reactors a long time ago??
Again, yes, we have been and are being LIED to —— but aboot what , exactly???
I’m almost to the point where Mr. Gurdjieff’s[ D.D.] “Table of Hydrogens” actually might make more sense — almost.
1 Like
Backing down the A-bomb narrative: Ben Norton marshalls U.S. government documents as evidence to partially expose its official lies.