Just one little thing that’s been in the back of my mind the past few days … if this platform will allow posting of the link -
Let it or make it burn down and build back “better”… we’ve got plans!
And here I am going to hide behind Catherine Austin Fitts because I completely agree with her. Sorry not sorry.
Like she says, there are multiple functions built into actions by the globalists. How better and safer to police using electronic surveillance and drones…I’m having a vision of the front end loaders used to scoop up people and dissipate the crowds in the “Soylent Green” movie.
Wonder how come they didn’t use them on the crowds in LA? I guess cause someone could have gotten hurt or killed, a trigger for bad press.
Some came up with the Twilight Zone episode (which I don’t remember) “To Serve Man.” But I agreed with CAF that there were other ways to achieve the same objective. Cut off financial subsidies to people not here legally and also take punitive action against those who hire them - which is never suggested on the so-called Right.
The real story of what’s been happening is much more nuanced - as always! - than Fox or OANN or Steve Bannon are claiming. Apparently there was a deliberate decision by Stephen Miller to escalate the situation (no one is defending having porous borders, but there is more to the story than “evil furriners!”), and I wonder if he’s yet another closet NeoReactionary Accelerationist.
“Your papers please.” Or “Where’s your app for that?” Isn’t the surveillance state great for tracking do gooders and bad doers? Which one is which?
Love this description…closet NeoReactionary Accelerationist