Has the kirk shooting provided enough context to show what butler was? A psyop to put our front boss in chief Donald Squib Trump over the top. I’m not questioning the deaths, but I’m calling 100 percent bs on the ear shot. Wwf , but not even in it’s prime
interdasting. (this thread as a reaction to the event)
i am a hypocrite as i am here, contributing. but we’re being farmed for our reactions.
as our good host has hammered home to us and was brought up above - this is many things indeed.
op? yes
kirk ded? maybe, likely imo.
theater? oh hell yeah
is kirk/wife/kids totally manufactured to purpose in the first place? yes
was ANYONE here actually a “big fan” “well versed in what Charlie said”? I’ma guess, hell no. we all got caught up in our own way after the fact, didn’t we?
patsy or at a MINIMUM exceedingly un-believe-able FBI story? 100%
this thread. my reply. is, in my opinion, a decent chunk of the function of the OP.
watch, conclude, follow breadcrumbs, discuss. whelp, here I am, aren’t I? churning my little dopamine chasing self into satisfaction that i’ve found some answers and am armed to continue my POV on my little screen.
kekeke
parapower makes a funny joke
but the “patsy ate at DQ after sniping kirk” photo has “superman” promo poster
which is OUR cue to feel smart to know that it’s a ‘fake photo’
games within games - said the contented participant, curious.
More analysis on the shooting. May have to skip ahead at various points as the show had multiple guests on the subject.
… one has to admit that a head of state just popping up so quickly after such an event and for all practical purposes blurting out “we had nothing to do with this.” is pretty strange. I understand why Castro and Khrushchev might have done so in the case of the assassination of a sitting president but … Not that I have checked, but did any other head of state follow suit? I also have not heard his rationale for doing so. So the question remains … Why?
Yes, a bit odd. From what I gather Israeli intelligence is quite aware of everything going on in this country. Perhaps one of their analysts advised BB to speak up to head off the rumor mill? Or to help muddy the waters of upcoming narratives.?
Or a case of projection?
… could be … but why not wait until someone asks? … still a strange one to me.
Uh. They had EVERYTHING to do with it, even if Kirk wasn’t shot. It was time for the American people to understand just HOW purchased the USA CORP Government is and has been. Signed up with the Israeli Mafia (my interpretation) as well as indebted by 3 separate bankruptcies that the Rothschild/Bank of England used to own the people and the land here in the US. That sickness spreads into the states, which are ALSO corporations and into the large cities… YEP, also corporations. That was the demonstration of black clothes with blue sashed “royals” in London this week: the King of Britain, the Bank of London, are no longer owners of the US REPUBLIC nor are they the slave owners of the People of UK, Canada, Australia, etc. You can hate Orange Man but he was sent by the military (alliance) to do this. He and Melania wore black to the funeral of the British monarchy as we have known it (or thought we did - Charles & Co were taken out several years ago due to treason and child trafficking/torture.)
Come along Camilla, we musn’t be late for the masked ball, I do love a good sniff whatwhat.
As dr. Farrell have noticed in his first blog of the year, Rockefellers went rough and decided to split from their masters Rothchild’s to the point that their empire found itself under a serious attack.
Immigration crisis in UK is most likely done by US intel agencies to energize British masses against government with ultimate goal of weakening of British monarchy to the point of their complete submission to USA.
Of course I don’t have any proofs of that hypothesis, these are just my musings, besides peculiar commitment of Elon Musk( one of the tech bros) in UK in internal affairs
Finally, I am sorry that DarkJournalist wouldn’t listen to my suggestion that Charlie Kirk is in witness protection (he basically said that I was a sad person for thinking that - fine), but those of us in the patriot movement who have understood the reason for Q, studied it, and again, tried to let others “inner stand it”, we say “if you know, you know”.
I’m re watching some of DJ’s show.
He says “there’s no note”. Does he mean that there was a note, but destroyed, and therefore “no note”? Or there never was a note?
Also, Robinson is said to be not cooperating with authorities at this point. Presumably advice from his legal team?
He said they were operating on the concept that the roommate had a note but it was never found or produced.
Thanks. But if there never was a physical note (at around 1hr:11min into the show DJ brings up this possibility) then I think the whole text conversation between the roommates could be wholly or partially fabricated.
… maybe this was a reference to an “alleged” text in which Robinson asked the roommate to check under the computer keyboard for a note he left there.




