… What is to be done? or What then must we do? - L. Tolstoy
1 Like
Imprecatory prayers? 
It has always been Chlamydia vs. Gonorrhea. It’s multiple choice with no “none of the above” option - unless you don’t participate (vote, pay, register, etc.). Ahhhh, unwitting consent.
Why no one should vote….
Thanks for posting his Substack! I’ve known of him for years but forget to follow his Substack, partly because I can’t afford to subscribe to all the writers I like.
1 Like
If the forced errors of jfk, 911, led to trump, one would imagine the unforced error of the epstein list is opening the door to the front boss nazi elon party and the rest of the technocRats transhuman shuckster cult .
All according to plan, just like the miracle shot the angels saved trump from
Also the addictiveness to twitter (cia and friends favorite psyop tool they own), and psychological loyalty must be out of this world . From trump was almost taken out from dems, to elon is bringing up the list, to trump denies it, makes elon the front boss for the dark side the beacon of truth.
Also I’m thinking the ridiculous plastic surgery is to hide whatever is underneath, time it has to do with a front boss. Finding out bezos grandpa founded Darpa really through me for a loop
3 Likes
He’s very good!
His “Zika” probe was spot on.
Too many pay wallsl too may writers.
He does has public access.
So I just read, that which requires no credit cards.
[except herein]
1 Like
Just heard a good one about that…
“Jeff Bezos spent all that time building up Amazon but then decided to buy his wife from Temu”
5 Likes
I’ve probably read every book ever written on the Sunken Continent. From Plato to Frank Joseph (Destruction of Atlantis) to Richard Wingates “Atlantis in the Amazon” where he does an amazing job at reconstructing the events that led to it’s destruction and the existing evidence hidden by the establishment.
I think it’s the latter book that hypothesizes that a true disclosure would destroy our faith in both religious, social and political institutions. Religions who interpret their scriptures to hide the true age of the earth, the technology that once existed, historic institutions like the Smithsonian which might possess ancient relics in places we can’t visit. The acknowledgement of weapons so powerful, which were taken away by the Ecuadorian Army, Crispy Artifacts, that every nation on earth would go to the ends of the earth to get their hands on such technology? We’ve been taught that Columbus was the first discover America. What if that entire lie was dismantled and the world realized that Columbus wasn’t the first, but the last and what we are told in history class that the America’s were just a bunch of native American’s roaming around was a lie? That a culture so advanced, a melting pot from all around the world, global trade, mining etc, etc… took place. Could civilization handle these truths without some kind of epic institutional and religious collapse?
Do I need government to tell me what is true? I think I know the truth about ancient continents, visitors from other star systems. I think my model of the world is pretty rigorous from all my study and from my own experience. That’s another story altogether.
I don’t need government to validate my objective and subjective insights into the unknown.
Here Scott Adams is suggesting something very similar. We all know we’re being lied to. What if the secrets are so harmful that it would cause the collapse of corporate and political structures and confidence by the American public?
Could the average Joe handle that the people who hold the highest seats in our nation, Past Presidents, and the men in charge of the US GNP and employ millions of people are members of a sick cult that worships the occult to maintain their power and engages in immoral activities so debaucherous that releasing this information would put our national security at risk?
Not only would it create chaos among the citizenry and distrust in all our institutions but it would also signal to all leaders around the world, that our national security was comprised by the most depraved form of black mail.
What would be our standing in the world then? Would we see a total collapse of our international standing as well as such internal strife, maybe even religious leaders, that society wouldn’t be able to absorb the impact?
What I hear Scott saying is…YES! Most definitely. We done messed up BIGLY!
I call the suppression of alternative history a form of “informational martial law” The government controls the information to prevent a total institutional fall out. They ain’t never gonna tell us nor do I expect them to.
The question becomes is it just? As a country, we’ve never really had to grapple with these questions and Socrates and the Founders are long gone to ask them what natural law would say to do under these circumstances.
You’ll have to decide for yourself.
6 Likes
Not a red-button Fitts, kind of guy.
Checks in the mail!
No problemo!
While I do appreciate the perspective and agree with the possible outcome of such major disclosure/revelations…
And I may be speaking for myself here but were I told that if that thread were pulled it would ultimately unwind society itself…I’d most certainly “fly her apart”
Wasn’t that more-or-less in the plot to the Matrix anyway? Most people would rather live the lie?
Incidentally and tangentially…those two brothers that allegedly created the Matrix then BOTH decided to go trans? Yeah, I don’t buy that line either.
Give me liberty and give them death. That’s how it goes right?
2 Likes
Ahh, Patrick Henry. One of my favorite’s in the study of rhetorical language and persuasion. Although, Franklin was no slacker in that area.
Persuasion Techniques: Emotional Appeal (Pathos)
Some weapons grade persuasion by Henry by stirring deep emotions, invoking fear of British oppression and hope for liberty. In his 1775 speech, he warned, “The war is inevitable—and let it come!” to heighten urgency and get the poor citizen involved. It was a recruitment slogan for the time. A call to martyrdom. If this was really our choice, then most of us would have shot ourselves numerous times under the last administration.
“I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”—a dramatic pledge that inspired sacrifice. The average person had no interest in a war and they had to pay soldiers, the poorest, to fight. Ya gonna need some good slogans.
'Tis better to be honest than wealthy," is one of
Benjamjn Franklin’s axioms. He was a wealthy man who made
his way upward from poverty to wealth. But when he became
rich, he didn’t want to have anything to do with the poor, so he
started inventing postulates for the American poor. These postulates
are only to salve the mind of the poor so they can think
well of themselves.
Remember, one thing the rich have is dignity- so the poor
want it. The middle class strives for the respect that goes with
power. It is dignified for the rich to help the poor, and there is
always an undercurrent in motion which hardly anybody under~
stands-a swapping between the rich and poor. The poor ex~
pect to use the dignity of the rich and be cared for, and the rich
expect the poor to want their dignity so the rich can gain more
benefits.
The entire history of the world is based on lies and controlling the unruly masses. Every school teacher, every military commander knows he must control the group which he leads. Even as a libertarian minded person (not a member of any party) and the non-encroachment principle, there are times elements in the population need to be controlled. Most of us don’t feel we belong in that group.
India used moral laws which were first conceived by priests, and later it
was also used by politicians for the purpose of managing the
unruly and rebellious in their groups. They managed it through
postulates until their assumptions became law. This was based
upon what might be termed the validity of reason.
For example, the postulate made by Manu, the great civil judge in ancient
India, was for the protection of the poor. He proclaimed the cow
sacred in order to hold down thievery, since the cow furnished
most of the staple food products for the family. This postulate
finally became solid and was considered a sacred law, so today
the cow is generally regarded as sacred throughout most of
India. Try telling a Brahman that his cow ain’t no more sacred than a feral pig, or Zebra and have at it. First problem is, they probably won’t believe you. Second problem is they would have killed every cow until there is nothing left. Not all men can handle liberty responsibly.
I’m willing to consider that the truth is so bad that there are large swaths of the population better off not knowing what’s going on.
I know Trump knows apophasis (also known as paralipsis). This technique involves mentioning something by saying it will not be mentioned or it shouldn’t be mentioned, thereby drawing attention to it. For example, Trump says, “Could you all just FOCUS on the very many other more important things to discuss than whether or not I may or MAY NOT be all over the Epstein Files?” by bringing up the Epstein Files while claiming to dismiss them, he effectively highlights the topic. (this is Scotts “wink, wink”). He’s doing anything but sweep it under the table. Essentially he is giving us tacit permission to keep on talking about it while giving the masses some other candy to chew on. I’m sure 90% of the commentary equals, he is lost his mind. I don’t think that’s on the table here.
MEXICANS and FLOODING (capital letters) got me thinking what he might be alluding to other than the obvious. Texas had catastrophic weather event.
Seems like cloud seeding and weather modification is not only acknowledged by the Mexican government but you can find descriptions of it on their government websites as well as MSM articles. They do have English translation you can click.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/23/mexico-cloud-seeding-project-drought-heatwave
Could the tariff war, the cartel war, Trumps claim that Mexico was holding back water from the farmers be what he is presenting here without telling us?
2 Likes
I just had another thought. I think this is the most likely scenario. When Trump came into possession of whatever files exist, he realized that he had the ultimate stick and carrot in his very own hands. Imagine any other president having the week(s) he had prior to this? Every single global initiative going his way (except Ukraine I suppose). EU NATO nerds went from wanting him dead to calling him daddy. Israel was leashed when it wanted to go in for the kill. Stopped wars in Africa and India/Pakistan. All of his bills passing, all of the SCOTUS wins. Actually deporting illegal aliens with no concern for the “optics” as they all love to say. To me, Trump now has the blackmail material and is using it to get his agenda passed and on the move. I don’t think the Epstein material will ever be released as long as it provides a machavellian crow bar for him and his future party insiders.
2 Likes
Also, Trump could not have been involved in the dirty stuff with Epstein. If he were, is there any doubt in anyone’s mind that the DNC would have used it to destroy him?
3 Likes
DJT seems to be a different man one on one (second hand info). Perhaps he is genius and the psycho-babble emissions from him are off the cuff craft he uses to confuse/defuse and still (sort of) communicate intent. I wonder is he the first (only) to possess this technique?
The Clintons famously latched onto the control files that FBI had accumulated on politicians and I remember hearing took them with them after leaving office (perhaps why they stayed in influence for so long). Your assertion the info is useful has merit.
I noticed yesterday an older statement from FBI sources about their haul from Epstein’s townhouse that referenced ‘over 300 terabytes of data’. I thought that interesting since IR also mentioned they’ve hacked/taken ‘over 300 terabytes of data’ (ostensibly from IS). Was that a subtle message from them they also have the dirt?
" I wonder is he the first (only) to possess this technique?"
Lincoln was a master persuader. He wanted Ulysses S. Grant as his general but his political enemies labelled him as a drunk. To which Lincoln replied.
“If I knew what brand of whiskey he drinks, I would send a barrel or so to some other generals.”
Abraham Lincoln.
Lincoln won 300 wrestling matches and talked smack while doing it.
Lincoln knew that abolishing slavery would destroy the union. And he used weaponized hypnosis to change people’s minds, reframing slavery not as a legal issue but a moral issue. Lincoln knew that if he moved to quick, the public couldn’t handle it. He was basically using his monster skillsets to lead the people into a new paradigm sans slavery.
Obama and Clinton were professional level hypnotists. Kennedy and Reagan high up on the list.
“That is no longer the case” What a loaded phrase.
“Corrupt leadership often prevented them from doing their job. That is no longer the case.”
Did Trump make a deal with former corrupt leadership that has been running interference getting them to back off?
when Epstein was taken out, all that blackmail material didn’t disappear.
IT CHANGED HANDS.
It’s quite possible that the information is now getting put to use in a different direction.
Some background on Trump’s skillset.
2 Likes
“rhetoric pro”…perhaps accurate. My take on why he developed this style is negotiations on real estate and loan deals often found him wanting things the other party did not intend to give. Using intentionally imprecise (confusing?) language that hints at the deal being offered was a way of dis-arming opposing negotiators and getting them off their ‘go in’ position. When he speaks this way you have to depart from the thought you initially have in your mind and think “what did he just say?” It obviously worked well for him in business. In government, I think the jury is still out. It could backfire.
1 Like
Sarah Westall just did an excellent interview with Bill Binney & Katherine Horton!! For any of you “brains” out there…it seems The Game is all over. We Normies can’t even understand what is really going on!! Bill has the “answers”, but he just keeps being targeted…The Controllers don’t want “answers”…I wonder how many “sides” are involved in this struggle for planet Earth??? 
1 Like
In my view it’s all designed to separate man from God and his natural order, the ultimate truth.
@Scarmoge @neru
If Trump cares more about Nobel Prize than his MAGA, fellows then is is done. His Narcissistic hubris will bring his ultimate defame.
One thing I don’t understand, if he never really wanted to bring to the light Epstein files, why put to prominent positions Bondi and Patel, who talked about that issue in every public appearance, enticing public that justice is coming. Why not chose people in administration who have zero experience on the matter.
Something doesn’t add up?. It looks like we are not done with the story.
1 Like
Yes. I just finished reading some material from Mike Benz on what he thinks was part of the real Epstein story - involving the CIA and that darling of the upper crust NYC social set - well known to DJT - in the 1980’s - Adnan Khashoggi the arms dealer. I didn’t know Trump bought his yacht from Khashoggi, among other minor details. I knew they moved in the same social circles, but didn’t think about closer ties.
Benz says the blackmail operation was a sideshow & never as significant as Epstein’s CIA work. My problem is his interviewer believes in the delusion that there is one political party that are paragons of virtue & righteousness and another where all the evil resides.
Dumb as a post. The post is smarter. What about the pursuit of power & control makes one think those doing it are any kind of paragons of virtue? Smh.
2 Likes