I beg to differ, I’ve come across the real thing more than once…
4 Likes
Me too used to think exactly like that. Literally word for word as you say about psychics. The fact that they are not advertised, or that they are rare or their poor social and economic status or because “people don’t understand true psychic ability”, are no excuses, that they really exist as such.I can only say that I was in an illusion. In a delusion.
“the real thing”?
Is there unreal thing as such?
Yes there is “The real thing”- Both my maternal Grandfather and his brother had it…and they were far from perfect as human beings. As with much in life, you have to experience it first hand…You cannot be “Gifted” the belief in it in rational or intellectual terms…and for many of those with “Clear Sight”- it’s something of a lifelong torment. and does not provide much, if any, comfort…
2 Likes
@neru
I post ALL the DJ broadcasts when I’m aware of them, whether I agree with it or not. Everyone has a right to their opinion. It’s still a semi-free country. Yes, I saw the interview.
@noname000 Everyone entitled to their opinion. Been there, done that.
For my part, I saw one interview with her on DJ years ago, and that was the last for me. There was a check within my discernment and I simply closed the door for myself, no rancor. This discernment is one I do not explain or rationalize, it has saved my attention, time, sanity and my life at various times, it is not for sale.
In a world fraught with deception, high speed ads, and paranoia, “ops and dark strongholds,” for what purpose(s) do you, yourself, disseminate material, that you have admittedly vetted, and yet do not believe in? Or, if you do have a purpose, why not state your motivation, initially, at the thread’s introduction, allow others to well consider it,(entitled to their own opinions, as you do state)? Perhaps, include any elements of the material with which you largely disagree, owning a nuanced position at the outset, as one who is responsible for starting a thread, and kind enough to us to provide the reasons why you disagree/partly disagree with the material you are now posting? Thanks for listening to my concerns about this matter. Alicia xo
2 Likes
Sorry, wrong thread for DJ tonight.
One time I watched a full show with her and didn’t find her unusually deep or perceptive, rather too woo-woo and something about how her eyes floated dreamily around made me feel uncomfortable. She’s very attractive and her biggest fans seem to be males 
1 Like
Yes, that emptiness behind her eyes, is palpable and worrisome at the same time.
2 Likes
I do listen to her on occasion. I find it is easier to listen to her rather than watch her because her beauty is distracting.
It’s a shame that it is hard to take her seriously because of wondering and beautiful big eyes and perfect face.
All I can say is I thank God it wasn’t an interview with Millie Weaver again. Sheesh…
1 Like
These are some good questions, hope we can read some answers soon from The Beaver.
Umm, perhaps she is some kind of “Alien sex robot”-(like Ingo’s LA experience)…and DJ does dress like the “Men in Black”…I catch most, if not all Dark Journalist’s work, and I think it’s great on the whole. But I can’t help but chuckle when he says “Tonight we’re going to be going Deep”- I have to wonder if there’s not just a little bit of salacious humour in there…could be just me I suppose… 
But as for Gigi…Nah. I’m not buying it 
1 Like
Not me…She’s too away with the Fairies…
Yes, they call the “Unreal Things”- “Gigi’s”
1 Like