Yeah in well aware what communisn is and who funded it etc.
But i have reason to suspect that stalin was not easy to control and wasnt the puppet that his handlers had hoped for.
Im not saying stalin was a good person or that communist russia was a paradise.
However i think the deepstate had a plan with Ww2 that didnt go as well as they hoped.
They still won and got control over the world in the end.
But i still think they wanted more progress then they essentielly settled for.
i am pretty sure he was poisoned.
and pretty hard to control. few know that he attended a catholic-jesuit seminar in Georgia… not orthodox. some even say that he was ordained as well. i have no confirmation on that, but would fit the picture.
I think that happens to all the dictators in the end.
They come to a point where they know they will be disposed of after they have served their purpose.
My point is that we have been brainwashed into beleiving these puppets somehow are worse then our own puppets.
But i think history will show that alot of the worst dictators at some point tried to break free from the cabal and thats when they became “crazy and evil” in the public eye.
Im still not gloryfying them or anything, i just think we need to be open minded that the truth is very far off from our pov.
Ghaddafi for example may have ruled with some very strict rules.
But libyans had a very high standard of living under his rule.
He was openly challenging the cabal and was made an example of.
Then they tried taking out erdogan and Syria but by then the game has turned against the deepstate.
So 2012 was actually the time alot started going to noodles for the oldguard.
u made me very happy.
our (urs and mine) povs r seemingly convergent mostly on everything what we ‘talk’ about.
Watching foreign press question Kamala Hairyass, is absolutely enlightening !! We see just how surreal ignorant unprepared not ready for prime time, this admin is and how contrived coordinated the domestic press is when they portend to question presidroid biteme. It’s alarming that I’ve accepted the correographed news and learned to block them for mental health reasons. My community of fellow losers here, aside, since mr trustworthy Cronkite convicted Lee Oswald of murder 30 minutes after the assassination of a president on prime time. Ever since my examination of this time period, in retrospect, after living through it, our media was never honest truthful for even accurate and it’s so awful and unbelievable today, it’s counter productive not only as a source of information, but even as a propaganda tool for our leaders, it’s an abject failure. We Americans will go on instinct alone we do not to trust anyone and we don’t believe anything rather we go with what we know, and certainty is not part of the equation…good luck
Supported by this report from Pepe Escobar. The Nazi’s in Ukraine, a group Putiin vowed to eliminate, are most likely responsible for the carnage of Ukrainians.
Russian army by trespassing the Ukrainian border is responsible for carnage of UKR.
Putin created false flag same way as Dubya with WMD in Iraq. No matter how you spin it Russian army doesn’t belong on UKRAINIAN territory, same way as American army doesn’t belong in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Perhaps they are looking for the same kinds of things Oak Ridge National Laboratory is gathering: ear wiggling ability, tongue curling, novelty seeking personality traits…behavioral genetics. Transhumanism p 245-46. Reminds me of searching the internet for dog breeds for just the right combination of characteristics …
So true. Sometimes ignorance is bliss; sometimes just going along with the hype is easier; that is, unless one is right in the middle of the mess and looking at the real facts and repercussions. Thinking of you and others who are living it now in Europe. So sorry.
Thank you for the link. It was interesting with regard to information; but also, it reminded me of the difference between the time when all we knew was on the news, and we believed it. Now when we don’t believe the official story and have the ability to go around the story and find information on alternative media outlets. On one hand, they use media to control our thinking; on the other hand, media allows us to move around the control. Does that make sense?
Makes one wonder about all the bad guys.
Still wonder if Branden is as daft as he portrays because you know the official story, “it is not his fault”; it is “elder abuse.” He and his compardes remind me of @Neru’s “shimmering in the background” visualization.
oh, boy. here is the President of the USA, u surely believe him, don’t u?
… is he lying?
you to well come, surely great guy that gonzo is. - said master yoda
I think that’s called a paradox.
I think he might be even more daft than he looks, if that’s possible… One speculation I’ve entertained is that they purposely chose a blabbering, embarrassing fool – two of them, actually – as a kind of psychological warfare move (among other reasons). The apparent goal would be: (1) to make the U.S. look foolish on the world stage, and (2) to humiliate and demoralize Americans at home. I also think that part of the intent and effect of the CV19 op and the election chicanery was to demoralize a large part of the U.S. population. Assuming my scenario has some validity, I get why somebody would want to do #2, but who is behind #1 and what are they trying to accomplish?
“They” will try to accomplish a Constitutional Convention, now that USMCa is in place. With Dem Pres, VP & Speaker, it will be much easier to open a Convention & with majority House, they will likely destroy The Constitution.
I would go with #2 because that is what is happening IMO. However, your question about #1 is interesting. Why would they chose #1, when “they” have controlled leaders in the past who don’t appear daft? Psychological warfare - hmmm. Both speculations could be psychological - hmmm Maybe they are backing/playing both sides - the usual MO. May be it is like treading water. The whole Brandon thing is worth watching on a psychological level, perhaps.