It all really is just COG getting much more regional and local. People go on and on about the CIA and the FBI on the vanilla right. They see them everywhere. I tell them you got to be really concerned with, the department of homeland security, HHS, NSA and the Capitol police who aren’t even subject to FOIA are the ones who are really going to implement this thing. The TPP is the last phase of the UNs regional development agenda.
At the least you folks are thinking…All of what you assert ‘could happen’. But, that will not very likely be effective, because there are far higher dimensions above the 5th, or 6th, or even HIGHER dimensional levels that very few have considered.
So, as have I written and linked about, i.e. how China Believes in ‘Three ‘Magic Weapons’ and the ‘Seven Perils’ of Unconventional War’ there is one, or more than one points your MASTERS do not know about. So, I will give you a clue, i.e. hypersonic missiles, for which there is NO known defense. I do mean there is NO KNOWN defense against hypersonic missles. I could elaborate here, but just start thinking on your own.
SURE EVERYTHING , and I mean EVERYTHING that you assert could happen, BUT, it can be ‘wiped-out’ in a moment of “TIME”, or the least within a couple of hours…
You have NO understanding of what COULD, or at the very least, MAY happen. As written above, you have No UNDERSTANDING.
ABSOLUTLEY None… Bring on your best, but you guys have NO clue to what is going on. NO CLUE!!!
1 Like
By all means, enlighten us.
1 Like
Who will they use these missiles on? Surely not earth. The club house is too small for all its DUMB members. I’m thinking more like space if they use them.
Fear controls the masses. It’s really getting old all this talk about nuclear missiles, etc…use them already! They won’t.
Thanks for the reference. Interesting video at Epoch Times.
Japanese Prime Minister was first foreign guest to the White House…
As far as 2024, we have not finished 2020 regarding POTUS…
Russia said it was doing hypersonic missile drills. The sound of the last trumpet, and we are out of here. Honestly, at this point, I don’t know what’s worse, I think I might take the missile before the transhuman MOJO stuff. Geese, what a smorgasbord of doom.
2 Likes
I’ll take the missile any day before the transhumance accompanied by mass genocide. I asked my spouse yesterday “so how does it feel walking around, trying to live in harmony, doing your thing when you know there’s people out there that are trying to kill you?” It hurts like birth pains with each day more intense. I think “they” truly prefer the slow agonizing death over one Big Bang and it’s done. I think “they” get off on it.
2 Likes
Right. I don’t care what anyone says. This isn’t political, this is purely satanic and it’s target is Christianity. In fact Lauren Boebert just did a segment where she read a department of homeland security memo that actually said that to avoid misinformation, do not go to churches. It might have said synagogues and mosques to, but it urged good law abiding citizens to avoid church. I’ve yet to see a pastor around me whose even discussed the vax in the pulpit. It’s simply wrong. Sadly most churches so lukewarm, they won’t even allude to the covid measures and its parallels to the end times, yet that’s still not good enough for the state department!
2 Likes
The “hypersonic” missile is DISINFO. Being reviewed right now live. See the thread I just posted!
1 Like
Good to know. So much info/mis/dis and that flying around about the Russia psyop it’s not surprising. I’m curious how you would even test that, I mean Siberia is huge but doing something in the bare wild is nothing like dropping it on a major city.
Real religion encourages finding God personally and directly, not through clergy acting as middle-men.
Most modern churches have signed onto 501c3, which has contaminated them.
1 Like
True, and yet there’s the state department urging people to stay away from the fluffy churches they contaminated. So disgusting. Even fluffy bunny christianity too godly for them. If anyone dares has faith outside themselves, how will they ever trust the government?
1 Like
This!
The myth about radiation and the total destruction from nuclear war is just a very old fear tactic.
Of course nuclear energy is a very potent tool that can bring alot of destruction.
However there is alot of propaganda around how long radiotion sticks around etc.
Also there is alot of difference in the bombs used in japan compared to modern tactical nukes.
Imo they use smaller versions of the atomic bomb all the time.
Cant prove it but dig around and see for yourself.
Its just that the people controling the energy market wants to minimise the use of nuclear energy.
It keeps the price of oil,gas and other alternatives viable.
But its slowly changing with the rollout of more mini reactors.
Even though the tech has been around for over 50years.
It just didnt make sense for the powers that be.
2 Likes
I agree. Do you know how much radiation we’re exposed to on a daily basis. Our microwaves, cell phones, etc. I’m sure it’s not good for us, but I do think it’s been vastly overstated in terms of the longterm effects on a fall out. There’s certain breeds of mushroom that can rapidly eat nuclear waste and convert it into harmless carbohydrate. Look up 7 ways mushrooms can save the planet. The fact we aren’t innovating our ways to better health and dealing with nuclear waste and radiation in particular is deliberate.
1 Like
@Soupcommie I admit I know nothing about modern nuclear missiles but with that being said, I’m so tired of articles and news reports talking about Nuclear Missiles as fear porn. My thought was with all this media exposure about wars and rumor of wars using their hypersonic supersonic nuclear (in)fusion AI subatomic subterranean stratospheric bombs then just use them already. It’s all fear porn IMO.
@Vincek33 I do know a little about ionizing radiation and only a little because I was taught about it in my medical field. Yes radiation is everywhere but “the benefits do outweigh the risk” wink wink.
1 Like
" The implication is that a single nuclear attack would be sufficient to “wipe Israel off the map” which is absolutely not true in the slightest. The problem is that in common parlance we call both fusion and fission based weapons “nuclear” even though fusion bombs are orders of magnitude more powerful.
The measurement for large explosives is to talk about the equivalent amount of TNT that would be needed to produce the same effect. A 2000 pound bomb is a standard sized bomb dropped by planes to attack targets in war, while nuclear weapons are talked about in terms of tons of TNT.
Fission weapons use either enriched uranium or plutonium to produce the explosion, and most weapons are between 14 and 20 kilotons. Fusion weapons use hydrogen to create the primary explosion (there is actually a fission-based trigger that explodes in order to start the fusion) and those weapons range between 500 kilotons for independently targeted warheads to 20 megatons for large but mostly obsolete bombs.
When talking about the individually targeted warheads, multiple warheads detach from the same missile (the missile is known as
[MIRV]
() with the currently used Trident missile containing 8 warheads for a total of around 4 megatons. This means that one fusion missile is 300-1000x more powerful than a fission bomb.
Hiroshima was attacked by a uranium-based weapon, and an attack by Iran would be similar to this scale, not the hydrogen-based weaponry that we were worried about Russia using during the Cold War. In Hiroshima, around [70,000 people]
died from the direct effects, with another 70,000 dead within a few months. The area of total and massive devastation was around 2 miles in diameter, however, Hiroshima was not a modern city and they were not prepared for an attack. As it’s made clear in the book Hiroshima, many of the deaths were actually due to the firestorm that raged through the city’s wooden buildings and the reason why around 70,000 died in the aftermath was because they had no clean water, food or medical attention. A modern city with properly stocked bomb shelters would see much less devastation.
In order to destroy Israel, Iran would need to build many weapons. To obliterate even 1/100th of Israel’s territory (85 sq mi) would require over 25 bombs, assuming the same destruction patterns as Hiroshima. Even if Iran was competent at producing its uranium, it would still take [over 6 months]
to create enough for one bomb.
This means that Iran is over a decade away from being able to threaten Israel even if they were technically proficient and had the desire. Meanwhile, one US Ohio class submarine has 24 Trident missiles, for a total destructive power of nearly 100 megatons, and while Israel’s full capabilities are not known, they are believed to have dozens of weapons and submarine based missiles with the 4-20 megaton range.
There is no possible way that Iran can threaten Israel on a fundamental level with fission based weaponry, and to even do serious damage would require decades of production. Meanwhile, a single sub from either Israel or the United States could destroy most of Iran. The only purposes for building fission bombs are for a) propaganda and b) to potentially be able to attack forward operating bases during an invasion. It is the latter reason that we are so intent on countries not having Mikes.
When it comes to terrorism it should be noted that each bomb has a unique atomic signature and the source could quickly be determined, so the whole, “What if they give a bomb to a terrorist group that detonates it and then we can’t retaliate because we don’t know where it’s from?” is not a realistic question.
The far greater terrorist threat would be in detonating a dirty bomb that contained ordinary radioactive material, and this material is widespread with thousands of pounds unsecured in the former Soviet states, or even medical and industrial waste. This is why Obama’s mission with Sen. Lugar to coordinate the securing of such material did far more to help deter a massive terrorist attack than trying to stop nations from developing weapons.
If Iran started a fusion program then obviously the calculus would change, and there are real consequences of Iran having The Bomb — namely giving it a freer hand to harass its neighbors more conventionally and thus leading to a weapons race — but any serious discussion needs to take the facts into account. Hyperbole will not serve us well."
3 Likes
Iran, IMO, already has nukes, which does NOT put them on par with others. US, Russia, Israel have more advanced weaponry that Iran is trying to develop.
1 Like
I definitely agree, you can make a nuke in your basement, my gosh a 12 year old made a reactor with stuff he bought off ebay, and it functions well to. The only problem with nukes is the delivery systems. I would disagree with Soupcommie on that cuz it’s much easier to make a nuke that can wipe a small country off the map than it is to deliver one to said country. That being said, I do agree that much of the fallout reaction is not going to play out the way the media says and there are plenty of ways to deal with nuclear waste, fast and efficient. Problem is, if real nuclear waste management was viable the comptrollers of the world and their billion dollar markets would come into conflict. Oil is another lie. It’s super abundant, uses only a fraction of the carbon we consume as a species and is constantly replenishing. The belief it comes from dinosaur blood the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. All carbon turns to oil. Actually in the near term, oil is probably a better bet than nuclear cuz the Powers that be have regulated better safe use and disposal.
1 Like
You bet! Petrol is a renewable resource!
2 Likes
I agree. Iran doesn’t have the sufficiency to deliver a country destroying nuke, especially with the IDFs advanced airforce. I believe that Germany had the bomb, but our airforce and our ability to produce bomber jets and defenses made it incapable of delivering it. That being said, there are tons of weapons, declassified already that could wipe out the whole middle east if they were detonated, nuclear or nor. I think Star wars was a great program, and maybe that’s why starlink and NASA playing catchup in the satellite field. There’d be no reason to militarize Space if there wasn’t the possibility of a war on the horizon, global control aside.