what if the three jabs found him? so many possibilities.
few things. I do not know the protocol, but when emergency is called, then there is a cause. what was the cause and why does a Hazardous Area Response Team enter a scene, when are they called for?
p.s.: I just realized that my life won’t change a bit if I knew the answers 
… according to Google Brain …
The British Hazardous Area Response Team (HART) is called to enter the “hot zone” or inner cordon of dangerous, complex, or major incidents where standard ambulance crews cannot safely go, providing triage and lifesaving medical care alongside police and fire services.
When HART is Called
Hazardous Materials: Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive (CBRNE) threats and dangerous spills.
Extreme Environments: Incidents involving water rescue, deep mud, unstable terrain, working at height, or in confined spaces.
Major Disasters: Structural collapses, major building failures, train crashes, or massive motorway pile-ups.
Violent Threats: Marauding terrorist attacks (MTFA) or active hostile scenes secured jointly with police.
Staff Safety: Rescuing or treating injured emergency service personnel trapped within the hazard zone.
There’s a scene in the film “Michael Clayton”…
Rockefeller said, Give me workers.
Looks like the 20th-Worst Century says…
Give me Cannon-Fodder.
it does not look suspicious to me at all, that after an emergency call from a hazardous area (it was his family home, somehow it got dangerous), he was found ‘unresponsive’.
the narrative quietly leads to suicide. while he got his ‘academic career’ broken (which is a blessing), and was very distressed as some ppl say, but he got 2 children, and lived with them and with his wife, which is a big no-go. and as I watched a few minutes of him… he did not have the guts to kill himself, so he got cleaned out most likely. became too much of an embarrassment to the establishment. R.I.P.
It’ll all blow over and end up in the memory hole. Rather doubt any PhD candidate for an academic position in higher education will include the episode in a future dissertation on Wokeness.
i used to like zerohedge … until they used a cookie control which doesnt immediately give a ‘reject all’ option
It is now unacceptable to critique others work. So much for peer review … Am I right?
Academia, or rather, the whole educational system everywhere is read. Everywhere.
The educational system is RED everywhere
They know no peers; as there are none.
Academia is now an agreed-upon ideology.
With us all the while; while against the facts.
… straight up Realism v. Nominalism. Nominalism says there are no “facts”.
Sorry! I meant “dead” - but red is also apllicable lol
Nathan Cofnas discusses the intellectual history and scientific challenges surrounding the concept of human group differences. The lecture explores the origins of the equality thesis, its influence on modern political thought, and the ongoing academic debates regarding genetics and social policy.
Thanks, good to hear from the horse’s mouth. How intelligent is not allowing a discussion about intelligence? The “science” is settled, where have we heard that before?
I don’t know when I was tested, but I requested my high school records after I graduated and found out I went through the “system” based on an IQ test result of 102, no advanced placement classes for me. I can relate to the general intelligence he mentions.
Here’s the myth paper about intelligence he mentioned in his talk.
… also see Arthur Jensen’s work on IQ … this was the seminal article
I’m about half way through this book published in 2020. The author has taken the position intelligence is hereditary and plays a pivotal role in the transfer of knowledge. His contention is the educational system is downplaying the role of “g”, his symbol for cognition abilities, to promote equal outcomes for all learners. The “No child left behind” law in 1994 was a pie in the sky unrealistic program and was an utter failure and Obama’s administration had to issue exemptions to avoid cutbacks in federal school funding for failing schools. Eugenics is a nasty idea, thanks to the Nazi usage, anyone claiming intelligence is hereditary and immutable is in for trouble like the professor Confas.
well whaddayaknow
the investigation has altered course
The whole thing stinks to high heaven.