[USSA War with Mexico starts ate 9:47 clicks in - Video in form of questions & answers]
The video below starts ate 5:22 in - offers different perspective with proven track record.
Again, questions and answer format as above video.
1 Like
call it prejudice, bias, or call it a hunch, as it comes from my guts: I do not believe a word from this guy.
what proven track record?
just one snippet from the video is that when a ‘question’ for him says, that ‘the Saudis would fall for the Houthies’, he says ‘I wouldn’t doubt that’ … how idiot you have to be to believe that?!
you can not sell snakeoil, if the oil is not true…
payed or unpaid, but a shill fore sure.
2 Likes
He’s hit a significant number of predictions.
What was it Jesus said, Let he who is without… ?
Of course, He’s not right some times…
In comparison to others?
He’s above the fray…
Althgough when attacked, he stikes back.
Of course he’s pejudice…
Zionists certaintly don’t like him.
as I can grasp he’s trying to project escalation scenario regards nafta agenda [1] which think its steaming up [2] and if anyhow someone south oppose it, eventually cartels as armies in ties with mexican oligarchs [3][3] that could lead to usaf intervention where collaterals will be those that are hostages to the cartels!, actually “someone” is boosting such cartel militarization, so in the end when needed for the sake of nafta and the peace of all northamericans fastforward special operation could emerge in Mexico, hm, wonder canadians will stay calm, or will raise up with their spoons in hand!?
- hm, practically from such scenario also military industrial complex could pull bluff for new turn of investing, eventually somehow to be thrown in the mexican gulf, coz now cant be used in the iranian nor ukrainian front, while for sure need upgrade coz proved obsolete in Ukraine, thus eventual spin can help as the m’i’c so as the fed, and in essence once economy stall, wars are liquidity pump mids the current scarcity system [4][5][6][6][6] and some interesting speculation in this context would be that proper theatrical spin is thrown already few years ago in context of prepping cartels to act controlled opposition [4]
now, dont know nothing about MichaelY, but it would be interesting someone to mail him this post and see what will be his response … i.e. how I’ve made attempt to smooth out his logic with mine wild speculating, tho the jungle here in balkans is good whole one century playbook for easier big picture chase stamina … maybe, various variables can be added or extracted to this mosaic reasoning, but one thing is for sure, nafta is in full swing under DonaldT what gives bit sigh around eventual total hot ww3 escalation, or on contrary maybe not, i.e. mexicans imediatelly need to be pacified and swallowed by usA in given confederation and fast legislation ironing, ttip spin for americas which in his first mandate actually Doncho stopped in eU [7]
1 Like
Zionists do not like many people…
but a war with Mexico is pure horsemanure with a pressurized pistol. maybe somebody would like to have war between, and he is ‘told things’. many times ‘good’ info, sometimes not. or he with his given wisdom ‘sees these’. but forecast a war between USA and Mexico is just plainly utter stupidity or propaganda lie/programming/wishful thinking. It’s like when every day they say that Russia wants to conquer Europe. For what, for Christ’s sake?! to deal with their 'eau-de-latte shyte’™ too?!
@Ati it sounds like You are after the messenger!, I’ll say combinations million, so, debate them without bad language, how eventual agitprop would be evaded if You go by agitprop means, blackpropaganda comes to mind, or maybe You are “deir” bot, i.e. if such info is leaked one, now more than ever needs to be buried quickly 
dont take this like rant, but call to get back on track for juggling probable combinations …
- … eg. consider pride when DonaldT is in question, when unlike other “weak” presidents, he sees himself like absolute authority of modern western empire, i.e. he said earlier cartels need to be resolved, and probably still they are not, or maybe “someone” is playing him like that to secure continual war economy, coz helicopter money alone cant save it!?, plus in case he chill out on the iranian card, special operation in Mexico would be exit wild card … or maybe he thinks its more efficient to exist two walls for southamerican migrants, i.e. the second one in Mexico down south, in case nafta is implemented in fullness and investors need assurance safety to be guaranteed … saying stupidity and wishful thinking nowadays dont loom in geopolitics is very shallow understanding of the current power dynamics … try chase big picture stamina, and always with various variables, even wild guessing one, i.e. seeing out of the box, eg. when and how such info could become possible, So, going from start hyper’realistic in times when realism almost evaporated from the heads of euroatlantic determinists [1][1] think that is super wrong, not that I prefer fearporn, I tend also till the last breath to lean my hope on peace, but how when “someone” seeks only escalation!?
in case of Russia example thousand times spoken lie can become reality, solely coz constantly eU is making statement friction, and once the russians will have enough, especially regards their red lines, surely will storm europe like fast train!, how they play now in Ukraine is war of attrition, and tactic stalling, coz risk hot ww-3 if push harder, eg. if use tactical nukes on Kiev, yet “someone” constantly pokes and provokes for, and lets hope russians will stay calm, but as we can see direct treats are issued by ea-determinists regards Kaliningrad, so what, You think Russia will not attack eU if something happens there, actually they already said dont cross that super red line, and let see maybe european neocons listened!?
You just have to aske the question in his comments area - it’s free.
He doesn’t charge.
He ask for money - but does no require it to participate.
If you go to his site in the AM, you can be one of the first to ask.
He reads them in order.[questions/answering same; and/or comments].
He’ll answer your questions, on air!
Other will hear it, and also may resond…
1 Like
Time will tell.
Yon says, he doesn’t want to be right.
Neither do I want him to be right.
Dr. Farrell makes many predictions, that he doesn’t want to occur.
Yet, he has a stellar track record!
I will not be kind when some have the time, the money and the audacity to lying into my face and spreading bs propaganda from Japan/US(?) about Russia, when I’ve been living next to the Ukrainians and Russians for almost 50 years, and being totally aware of all the Central and Eastern Europe’s histories and political currents. If you are inclined to believe it, there is a bridge in Brooklyn for you. Its for sale!
I won’t even comment on your Trump Train in the Frame. I’ll let you keep your own thoughts about him, and keep mines to myself. As I read your (many) thoughts on (many) things, I am (not) afraid, our analyses do not match on cca anything. The truth is I do not even think that I understand your several times partly/utterly incomprehensible ameboid texts and sentences, and decided not to engage them long ago, just for the sake of my time. Sorry. I’ll let you ‘combinate’ on. Otherwise: Good luck!
Sorry Robert, but that makes it even worse. Because he has no real explanation to back it up. Doc makes his points with logic, facts and quite the geopolitical expertise and experience. But this is wishful thinking at most.
Or he does not even ‘know’ if its true, and cannot even support it, but says nothing to the contrary then…
…okay, perfect, make a podcast from it and do some private consultations too!!
sure! go on!
and one thing to ponder upon. if he calls (and many others) the jabs ‘Zionist WMD’, then why was Israel the most jabbed country in the world, Netanjahoo said that he made Israel a laboratory for Pfizer. and everybody bashes the Jews. I am not a Zionist friend for sure, but Israel has been the creation and the hand of the British Empire since its birth. Just as the current regime of Iran (in cahoots with the French), washing the billions of narcodollar cash into oil money.
1 Like
wonder what people do on GDS if I am heavy for deciphering, just go on the footnotes and You’ll grasp the gist of, tho when someone has will to spin the topic, eg. throwing rants from start, then it looks indeed like agitprop gaslighting, or maybe its just regular trend in usA debate to be skewed to bickering, so yeah would not evolve in useful manner, trend that is almost regular norm in usA on every eforum actually … what yeah smells on gatekeeping hype …
regards russians, as macedonian who have deeper insight how they thrive and reasoning, surely use that argument with big lightbulb on the head …
while whether MikeY received spin, or correct info, that cant be known, unless we dont calculate whatever possibilities in context, so I’ve thrown my logicism, which btw dont need to be utmost correct one, but throwing angry empty shells, whats the point, maybe want to say usA dont have paxamericana or paxuniversalis gangs in swampington, who knows maybe native americans can finally say we were liberated, yeah from the wilderness, simply the causality is such, that it rises till it became in this case empire, that will eventually need to chill out, and that “someone” cant accept it obviously, guess “who”!?
He makes them in other videos.
Not a Dr. Farrell, but he’s also got a track record.
He goes off on a tangent too many times.
But, I’ve watched him on other shows, where they continue to aske him questions - to get a deeper a clearer picture of his analysis. After many of those, I find myself more in his paradigm of analysis.
BUT, I’ve changed my viewpoint; so many times over the decades,
I know the smoke & mirrors game is not an easy one, to smoke out…
In fact, that’s getting me to spend less time on this.
I’d rather read my sci-fi novels.
1 Like
also, this is logical in case of global economic meltdown, i.e. to be secured the mexican realm so in such circumstances not generate instability in usA, plus second actually first wall would be on the southern mexican border, so as info is possible, but probable not like war but some special operation, where in this case mexican government will also participate so would be completely eradicated cartels probably by the salvadorian blueprint, dont forget cia rolled that hype there, would usaf carpeting will be enough or will be needed ground invasion, cant say, most probably mexiacans themselves will roll the inertia and ask day after usaf to join, at least this is most logical …