PART 1 Live Now: Rocket Attack on Israel from Gaza (Ongoing) - LIVE Breaking News Coverage (MAJOR ESCALATION)

This is that tatic of war where you accuse the enemy of doing everything you are doing to him, and you accuse him of being all the worst parts of what you really are.

Project into the enemy all the worst truths about yourself, the worst the image projected, the more truthful it is as mirror of the nature of your real self.

1 Like

Yeah that’s a bad show, worst ever possibly LOL

1 Like

They couldn“t have rode long ago, otherwise the enemy would have already conquered the entire planet, and placed everyone under the control of the beast system of mental technological enslavement.

Why to you think that they have already rode?

Read it again. Better yet, stay away from books…

1 Like

Sharp logic. Quality argument.

Technological enslavement? It has already been done…think of living without electricity? No lights, no computers, no internet, no air conditioning, refrigerators…etc.

1 Like

That’s North Korea for ya. The biggest concentration camp on Earth, not Gaza…

Technological enslavement is real technology, inside your brain, like this one presented in the World Economic Forum: Are You Ready for Brain Transparency?

Those things that you said are far from that, and this is isn“t the worst they have reserved for the masses. It“s about direct control of taughts and feelings.

1 Like

@g3orgeslu1zsegund0
You are not comparing texts and not using provable history. You misread like Evangelicals…
This is as close as it gets to a prophecy fulfillment AFTER the ascension.
It’s literally in our faces. Even flying flags!

1 Like

Pull the electrical power grid and nothing will work, even WEF’s shenanigans. Besides they don’t need any fancy technology, the propaganda of mass media is doing the trick. Look at some of the crap people say and think.

1 Like

In wich shape of form, i“m not comparing texts?
And in wich shape or form iĀ“m not using ā€œprovableā€ history?
What are the criteria that you use to define that the kind of history that you use is provable?

But for them, this level of control is not enough. Do you believe they are sane people, who have things like satiation and moderation?

Control is never enough, and those sick for it don“t stop until they destroy themselves in the process. If it“s possible to control completely a slave, they can“t stop in just indirect control trough propaganda, the only acceptable end is with total physical control like we control an animal in a lab cage.

Think of the rich people who gets 100 Billion in their account. How many of them are you seeing satisfied with they achieved? The more you have, the more you want to have much more. There is only one thing that stop a psychopath seeking power over its prey. Death.

@g3orgeslu1zsegund0
There are dozens, actually hundreds of documents to be used in these studies going back to just a couple of centuries AD. If you want a comparison study of Islam, the very least you will need is Bibles; make sure one is KJV, an English Quran and access to Strong’s Concordance. Enjoy the decades of study you have ahead of you, brother.

You didn“t answer my questions:
In wich shape of form, i“m not comparing texts?
And in wich shape or form iĀ“m not using ā€œprovableā€ history?
What are the criteria that you use to define that the kind of history that you use is provable?

I did answer your question. I don’t have that many years left to list all that I’ve studied. Good Luck in your studies.

Israeli prop. Awaiting some noteworthy Hamas prop.
Dinnertime!

You didn“t answer any of them.

  1. You didn“t say, nor showed, neither in direct, or indirect form, how i“m not comparing texts.
  2. Didn“t explicetly, in clear and direct way, said, nor showed, what specific texts need to be compared to wich other specific ones.
  3. Didn“t also give the argument WHY they need to be compared, what creates the logical necessity of comparing , neither what gives authority to only the method of comparation to say what is valid in what is not in matters of studying prophecy.
  4. You didnĀ“t say, nor showed, neither in direct, or indirect form, how iĀ“m not using ā€œprovableā€ history.
  5. You didn“t say, nor showed, neither in direct, or indirect form, what are the criteria that you use to define that the kind of history that you use is provable, so that it can be refuted openly by anyone who see the phalacies inherent in it.

Putting them again:
In wich shape of form, i“m not comparing texts?
And in wich shape or form iĀ“m not using ā€œprovableā€ history?
What are the criteria that you use to define that the kind of history that you use is provable?

1 Like

@g3orgeslu1zsegund0
Okay, that’s fine. Knock yourself out. It doesn’t belong on this thread anyway and I have no handy dandy bibliography to give you, nor would I.

Intellectual honesty is only for the wise.

1 Like

Looker for those interested.