President agreed to pay Hunter Biden’s legal bills in 2019, email leak:
1 Like
Fausti declares pandemic is over:
1 Like
this guy ‘proved’ legit in the last 2 years, and made a great job, i believe. we really forgot - were made to - what these jabs do to people.
1 Like
That’ll give the voters six months to forget the whole thing happened…
1 Like
Fausti, a pattern of unclear calls from a leader, particularly in the name of public health, leads to confused people. Confused people are easily controlled.
Be muzzled, Fausti! And… for your homework as an appointed beacon of health, advisor to the White House… I order you to cure America of one sick, mendacious president. (signed) Dr. Alicia Hill
2 Likes
Yep, that’s part of the operation, IMO.
Three FOIA lawsuits: Tom Fitton/Judicial Watch pushes back against government targeting of Project Veritas/journalists who exposed Pfizer:
Backstory here:
2 Likes
Yeah well I am over the Fauci stage. Go find another theater to practice your lines.
1 Like
Thanks for the coffee, Bill – Alicia xo
1 Like
Floridians push back on discrimination against the unvaccinated:
2 Likes
Friends (we early on “did our own research”and formed a support group to withstand the pressure and propaganda) live in a 55+ retirement subdivision that were hassled by their neighbors to get the jab when the jabs were first offered.
Two years later no one any longer bugs them, especially since they are kind Christians who now attend and assist the many who suffered from the side effects. Several of their neighbors have died, suffered mental decline, strokes and loss of hearing.
7 Likes
that father from Rome said as well, that we will have to carry the bodies and attend the injured… and the real wave is just coming. keep up the spirits!
1 Like
A summary article of the Health Freedom Defense Fund’s pushback against mask insanity:
4 Likes
Dinesh D’Souza pushes back with his new film. In brief: 4 million minutes of video captured 2000+ ballot trafficking mules stuffing 400,000 illegal ballots:
2 Likes
My Morning Muse: The States Rights to Choose
5/2/22
Nightmare, USA
More legal insanity . . . is Solomon cutting the baby in half?
A. This leak was not a good thing, but Supremes authenticate it:
B. Alito opines: “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
C. If B then: individual US States will choose.
D. If C, then: half the US States will ban; Abortion Apartheid begins. See new map of the USA.
E. If D, then: Travel from an Abortion-free state to an Abortion sanctuary state/aiding and abetting such travel for an abortion could be criminalized.
F. Ergo: Will the Bride of Bantustan be coming soon to a State near you? Me?? Nightmare!
P.S. Did Roe v. Wade just meet Brown v. Board of E?
P.P.S. “Solution” to E: Segregate . . . the trains between States? . . . other conveyances??
I’m putting on the coffee, Gizas.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
This is the way it was before abortion was federally legalized by mandate. I remember California being one of the first to legalize and women traveling there from other States when I was in high school. There was no fighting about it among States, although, times have changed, so, who knows.
I disagree that it’s a “nightmare”, although I agree it’s not good; I’d rather have it ruled completely unconstitutional, (because murder IS unconstitutional) and 100% illegal in USA. It’s ghoulish, evil crap that needs to leave Our Country. Hoping adoption agencies will become more active; so many want children who can’t have them.
God does NOT Bless nor even save a nation that practices child sacrifice. Maybe parts of us can be saved, IDK.
How they pushed back on ballot fraud through pattern research: Cellphone pings aggregated around dropboxes! The geospatial analysis behind D’Souza’s new film, Mule 2000:
To me, the leaking is worse than the possibility that there might be differences in law between states. The leak is either a type of “doxxing” or a social-engineering experiment / testing of public reaction, neither of which has a place in a sane society. (I don’t believe the U.S. is a sane society…)
As I see it, there are issues on which there’s never going to be a consensus in the U.S. If different states have different laws on these issues, then at least people have a chance of escaping laws they deem unconscionable, by moving to another state. I think that’s a better situation than one where the federal government has the ability to pass a law that half the population hates but everybody is stuck with. It’s true that’s a sort of balkanization, but at least it leaves a little room for freedom, gives a little to both sides, and, in my opinion, makes it easier for states that disagree to remain in some kind of federation.
I think the proposition that states could ban people from traveling for abortions is a scare tactic. How could they know someone was traveling for that purpose? If they could, would it really be practical to implement that kind of verification? Balderdash, I think.
1 Like
Good to see you today, FiatLux. Thanks for weighing in. Here is more on the leaks issue. Alicia
Investigative reporter Natalie Winters pushes back through her intense research. Galveston National Laboratory’s memorandum of understanding with the Wuhan Institute of Virology brought to light. Premiere’s tonight: