Shared elsewhere on the gds website by @Dooderonomy
1 Like
THis is precisely what i´m studying, the possibility that the so called Intelligence Services are in thenselves private interests, and work for other and diverse private interests, and their actions, choince, plans, projects and operations, also their goals and methods, their agendas having nothing to doo with the public good, but rather, working actively against it because, everything that is made for the greatest good of everything and everyone can be done in public, with nothing to hide or to fear, but anything, even the smallest intention of doing harm need to be hidden, to be kept secret, so that the perpretato doesn´t have to respond for his responsabilities, and the others can´t attest for themselves that it is actively working against them, to cause harm, to do evil, to destroyto deprive, to enslave and to poison.
We only need a single dose of full intelectual honesty and all those secret services will desappear instantly, because, if we make a law making state secrets a crime, since no state can be served by secrets, but, rather the opposinte, by being the the most transparent and open to scrutiny as possible, so that even the most skeptic mind could attest for him/her self all the honesty in the conduct, in the speak, and in the toughts of those in functions of power and influence.
Lets make a law demanding that everything, 200% of what is secret in the intellingece services be made open, and public, for individual scrutiny, analyses, and debate.
Is it serving the good of all manking, in a way so clear that even a child can see, and not a single intellectually honest person can negate?
Or is it working against this greater good of everyone for the lesser good of a small few, and the greater suffering of a great many?
Anything that isn´t 100% for the better of all living beings is a crime, must be punished, and extingueshed, and never allowed again.
Whith this single law, and single principle, and single choice, would end all private control of public future, resources, space, dignity, divinity happyness, beauty and life.
What do you think?
Lets make this together?
1 Like
Balance is needed.
Both in the private and public sector.
Looks like were heading for some version of…
“The Google Archipelago: the Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom” by Michael Rectenwald.
Power rarely gives up any freedoms taken.
It only understands one language.
1 Like
Balance is everything, we need a new kind of social organization where power can neither be captured by the private interests that work against the greatness of the many, and neither by public interests that want to weaken the individual, so that it can´t live without it, and don´t have the power to resist the public machine/state/government.
I´m worring on such a solution. Any contribution brother?
1 Like
Just ordering Michael Hudson’s new book that tells the history of how your question was addressed.
How the bad money won[as in WW1, Rome, Greece, etc.]
His site is chalk-full of current and historical analyses of achieving balance;
or, how the bad money has been continually winning for the Oligarchies.
3 Likes
Thank you so much brother!
Michael Hudson is a name that is in my periphery for some 10 years, but i´ve never gave him a chance. Your words changed that, i´m going to check him now.
2 Likes
1 Like
“Declaring oneself to be the sole purveyor of science is contrary to science itself, because science is a process requiring transparency, humility and a willingness to seek the truth. It should not take a court action to obtain the actual information that governments rely on to justify restrictions on charter freedoms; this information should be available to the public in real time.”
1 Like
COVID outbreak at CDC conference:
3 Likes
COVID protocols left treatable bacterial pneumonia untested and untreated:
3 Likes
Blood pushback: The public demand for pure, unvaccinated blood is rising
2 Likes
Yet another vax?
1 Like
Prayer and fasting? Some evidence to consider:
3 Likes
The following is a twitter post from Vishal says TrudeauMustGo_
“Wonder why majority of vaccinated didn’t support the freedom convoy and the unvaccinated Canadians? Why they didn’t protest against the authority and govt ? Watch the simplest explanation!”
6 Likes
3 Likes
2 Likes
Headlines like that John Carpay one piss me off. There were plenty of people paying the price individually in order to preserve their own freedom - did John Carpay? Can’t see it. And who’s going to make sure it doesn’t happen again - the same people who let it happen in the first place - i.e. John Carpay? Or, wait, is he going to ask the government to protect him from… Yeah, right.
1 Like