Best explanation I have heard yet. I must restrain myself from saying too much but surely there is a simple way for humanity to rid itself of parasitic infections like this?
The âkilling of innocentsâ argument has long lost any relevance. These folks obviously donât care who or how many people are killed.
Indeed understood but these folks still need to win the PR battle, and they are quickly losing conventional media as an ally.
Maybe need to pay off the PR folks to continue their projects. Rather doubt they give one iota about buy in from anyone.
⊠absolutely ⊠Logic (conventional or otherwise) would say stop all of this nonsense, spend your time attempting to make life in your country the best it could be for all of its people. Reliable power, clean water, decent housing, healthy food ⊠quite easy to add to this list ⊠what is so hard about this? I have never and probably never will understand. Oh yeah now I remember ⊠getting rid of the human debris that does not want the absurd ride of life to be a least mildly pleasant.
I suspect that this reveals the antihuman agenda. Turkeys donât vote for xmas trope. Whatever dark forces these earthly ânodesâ like whoever Netanyahu represents are actually planning they must bring many âpowerful useful idiotsâ along with them. Cue endless speculation about control files etc⊠but I suspect a more lockstep approach and have done ever since the planscamdemic.
Something changed, possible a time sensitive agenda.
I donât know why, but I think they (TPTB) are in a rush, some of the chess moves are self destructive, which means maybe they are less concerned about the state of the bank account after the party is over.
Bingo - thatâs what I heard this morning - was it Jeffrey Sachs on Judge Napolitano maybe? Someone like that. Or else Alexander Mercouris on The Duran⊠Judge Nap was going to have John Mearsheimer this afternoonâŠ
Seems human history is pretty much the story of an abusive relationship and like one, the victims think itâs normal, but stay in it for the children, only to find out later it isnât normal. Unfortunately the physical and mental damage is already done which in many cases gets passed on to their protĂ©gĂ©s.
I had not seen anything recently on the Duran about a time sensitive pressure on these moves but I do watch Alexander Mercouris on a daily basis. I must say I find it difficult to find neutral analysis here because I think the Duran is very Russia biased, I donât blame them but I want objective propaganda free analysis which I can only find from multiple sources.
They tend to be, Shadow, imho, but yes, we do need to check multiple sources, because in such times, some comments made are speculative even from experts, not fact, so you have to weed out the truth.
I watched them 'coz attorney Robert Barnes recommended them & I used to follow him - and I know he is no simp for Russia. But heâs not stuck in my generationâs âtheyâre still the USSRâ crazy either.
I come from the 1980âs generation (What is that? X, Boomer, Zoomer?) I have no idea how I am pidgeon holed but anywayâŠ
I kind of operate on the zero trust rule, so I listen, I cross reference and then I cross reference again.
What I do and this is by no means the right way, is to use heuristics to reduce the problem solving load, in laymanâs terms if it quacks like a duck its probably a duck.
I have no âevidenceâ to present here, but I think there is a time sensitive aspect to these geopolitical chess moves. I have no other way to describe a good reason to make dumbass geopolitical short term military actions like the attack on Iran we are seeing now.
⊠speaking of Napolitano ⊠He still needs to have Trump do some explaining. - FROM a previous post âŠ
Who, What, When, Where, and How âŠ
Mr. Trump on exactly what day (or days) and time (or times) did you see the unreleased JFK documents? How long did it take you to read through the roughly 5000 (NYT figure of 4684 docs - still unclear whether doc = page) pages? What is/are the name/names of the person/persons who handed you the documents? What agency/agencies were/are they from? In what physical location/locations did you see and read the documents? Did you read 5000 pages of ORIGINAL / PRIMARY DOCUMENTS? Did you actually read ALL of the 5000 pages? Given your previous claims concerning your IQ (you seem to be a fan of psychometrics) what are your reading speed and comprehension / content retention / recall measures? Were ALL 5000 pages completely un-redacted? If the documents are released and they contain nothing of relevance what are we to make of your comments to Napolitano? (paraphrase) âIf you saw what was in those documents Andrew you couldnât release them eitherâ (as reported by Daniel Liszt). If nothing is to be found in the remaining documents then either Trump lied to Napolitano about what he claimed to have read and understood or Napolitano lied about what Trump supposedly told him.
âŠ
Now that we know there was nothing in the remaining documents ⊠those plus many additional questions still remain.
Also, I donât think we have heard any more about the 2400 heretofore âunknownâ JFK docs the FBI found in February. When will Trump be reading those? ⊠and might we have a witness to his reading them?
For me this is the critical question:
What is/are the name/names of the person/persons who handed you the documents?
Ouch. Thatâs one way to put it âŠ
Ok so putting my neck on the line, CAF talks about a possible incoming cataclysm which would be a basis for extracting the 21 trillion to build DUMBâs.
Should we be entertaining the idea of a world power conspiracy between assumed world power âfoesâ who all know we are about to undergo a possible extinction event?
I donât want to be Mr. negative but its a compelling theory.
Well, none us get out of here alive. Everyone has to die. Nowhere does it say one at a time or a whole bunch at time or everyone at once.
I have yet to locate my specific expiration date though I have a rough idea, any time.
Haha I love this, yes indeed.
Matthew 24:36
âBut concerning that day and hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.â
Just a thought, imagine if Iran had a nuclear bomb for many years but never revealed it? I donât know just like letâs say Israel?
How would that change the dynamic of the strategic situation?
How inconvenient would that reality be for the collective west?
Just spitballing.
Take it with a pinch of salt, but I read on twitter from a Saudi media outlet that there was an earthquake in the Persian Gulf sometime today.
Registered a 3.7. I count that thereâs been at least half a dozen this year in Iran alone.
According to the Telegraph Iran officialy declares war.