Originally published at: ABOUT THAT TRIFLING LITTLE $300 TRILLION KLEPTO-CURRENCY ERROR...
By now if you have not figured out that I am dead set against crypto-currencies (which I’ve nicknamed klepto-currencies), and central bank “digital ‘currencies’”, and the whole scam that was such an early part of the klepto-currency narrative (that they were “unhackable”, were a way around the central banking monopolies on money creation, that they…
5 Likes
So, my limited brain is tying to analyze the repercussions of this $300T “blunder”
First question is cui bono?
-Bankers tied to Rothschilds who loose control over money once CBDC are implemented?
-Nazi International whose grip over US economy will also possibly diminish with CBDC implementation?
-China or rather CCP providing that they are independent and not a front for Mr. Global or Nazi International?
-Old Royal families (working against Windsors) do they even have enough power?
-Vatican( providing they work independently from Rothschilds)?
-Any fraction of International Deep State that doesn’t want America lead on the global stage, in the new handing out the cards, that is going out right now?
Who did I miss?
1 Like
Who is fulfilling the capacity the “committee of ten ?” Who sits in the Council of the 13 families, and who the 13th member (leader) ?
1 Like
The “mistake” seems like a message to some world players. Which ones and why? Perhaps the one world with “philosopher kings” is being acknowledged or discredited… if a typo can wipe out and destroy the world’s economy, what does that say about the stability of kleptocurreny?
Not knowing anything about the lady and 300 trillion she mentioned, found interesting interview of her.
4 Likes
Hmm . . . I wonder how much $300 trillion borrowed for 20 minutes could make in high-frequency trading on the world’s stock markets.
7 Likes
Yep, general feel of economy is down, but stock market is going up and up. Big divergence. It is unsustainable, and yet it is happening.
1 Like
What was that statement reputedly a JP Morgan quotation who knows. But it’s probably a salutary concept. "When I started getting stock tips from my shoeshine boy I knew the market was topping.” Might be time to bail and consolidate gains?
1 Like
This is most likely an old truth. In the era of algorithms and FASB-56, markets will be propped up until at least war with China in under containment. They can’t let market go down for too long, since that would be the end of the dollar supremacy. They have cornered themself.
2 Likes
ANYTHING fiat is absolutely worthless. This includes baseless cryptos and dollars.
1 Like
Are US coins fiat too?
1 Like
Their value will be based on the percentage of precious metals… which I think was changed in 1965. Silver coins earlier than 1965 are actually silver and can be collected as “junk silver” in today’s silver market, unless they are a rare coin and traded as such.
Dollar bills are worth $.03 which is why all costs are so incredibly inflated. Furthermore, they are IOU’s and not based on an asset. We will be changing to a gold backed system.
3 Likes
Another slow-motion demolition…
Until…
“THEY” pull the pin…
???
Then the “bottom”…
Falls-out from beneath…
???
1 Like
Leaves me out of the equation. Guess I better RSP the lunch invitation I received to sign up with a crematorium while I still have a few dollars for payment.
And vacuum (nearly said hoover) up the foreclosed properties and physical assets having never risked actually money on them in the first place. The true alchemy of the banking system.
2 Likes
As “They” did in the analogue; by-gone days of:1929’s, IHOP Crash!
1 Like
How did the program ‘think’ it could come up with such an astronomical number in the first place, and then finally land on that particular number as well?
Are there safeguards in the “system” that can and did ‘block’ any transactions from happening?
1 Like
“safeguards in the system”. Remember, with all these cryptocurrency products, there is a ‘company’ behind them by one definition or another. And this company if you’re lucky has authority to make big moves distributed among perhaps 10 people (bitcoin for example). Assuming none of the principals of the ‘companies’ is a saint, the only thing keeping them honest is self-interest (they obviously being large holders of the product who need to preserve it’s perceived value by fostering the illusion of security).
For someone to make a move/error of that size sounds almost to me like a message to the other insiders “I found a flaw”…“I (or others) could do this”
1 Like
Thanks for this insight, much appreciated.