1 Like
Their 9/11 edition was all behind the official story.
Occasionally - Science & narratives, manufactured to specs?
Another CIA publication bites the dust[at least in print]?
Too analogue for CIA interests?
2 Likes
If Popular Science is anything like Nature, the Lancet, the BMJ and other “leading,” “prestigious,” “scientific” publications in their current incarnation, well . . . let’s just say, I won’t shed a tear.
2 Likes
how convenient … cant have any inconvenient hard copies floating around in years to come spoiling their narrative
After chucking out science and replacing it with fantasy & propaganda, it must be irritating to constantly get caught on their fraud. Better pull the plug!
1 Like