Many did it out of love for others. One young woman I know cares for a disabled man; she took the jabs in spite of the risks so she could continue caring for him. Too easy for people to judge those who got jabbed as stupid.
Problem is that for average Joe, these things are quite complicated. Even MDs donât read all the studies, simply because of sheer volume of them. The gold standard of double-blind randomized studies was high jacked long time ago by Big Pharma. So even doctors donât know what is really going on with new meds.
I highly recommend book in a link. Written by Marcia Angell M.D. in 2005 after she resigned from premier post of chief editor of NEJM.
The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It: Angell, Marcia: 9780375760945: Amazon.com: Books
Also, I highly recommend following dr. P. McCullough on X. He has volume of accessible info on covid and covid jabs.
I agree with you. A few of my neighbors, who were dependent upon medical treatment for their very lives were threatened with that treatment withdrawal unless they got jabbed. Another instance is a woman who was a nurse for 35 years who refused to be jabbed and lost her job. All these cases are in Texas, no less, so it can happen to anyone. When you have few or no health problems, itâs easy to label others if your life isnât directly threatened.
The concern is that next time, as Emeril would say, they will âbump it up a notchâ, threaten taking property, bank funds, etc. We all know this.
Just speculation on my part but I think these sorts are now the ones we see succumbing to illness?
Again, strictly my opinion, I donât believe anything is âpurgedâ but only that various people take longer to react than others. From what little I can tell, this process can take years and much depends upon, as you said, âsensitivityâ and how much (many) jabbings someone received. I think thereâs research out there but not readily available to the public, else, it would have been removed from view. Iâm suspicious of those who are public and make the claim. Maybe, maybe not. We just donât know.
Perhaps itâs the royal familyâs sacrifice to Moloch⌠like Diana.
I think there is variation in immune systems and some systems can identify foreign substances and reject them. I think the theory is that there is variation in protein pathways based on prior infections and genetic expression. For those succumbing to illness, the differences in the detectable symptoms is how a pathogen finds an âopportunisticâ vulnerability.
I also think that is a very large part of it. Pre-existing conditions, whether one knows they have them or not, via whatever mechanisms, are playing a large part in this. Virtually all the people I know whose conditions are worse post jab had very evident illnesses, esp. Diabetes (80%+) and immune disorders. Iâm now beginning to meet others who appear healthy and have not had serious problems, who are developing maladies.
It has little to do with intelligence and everything to do with the ability to question authorities, especially the medical authorities. After all âDoctor knows bestâ LOL.
The part that I didnât trust was the concept of having your body create the disease instead of the old way of Exposing the body to a weak variant of a virus. The transfection activity was not fully understood. Pharma outsourced the actual vaccine to the human immune system without knowing how to turn off manufacturing and what else would be affected during the âprotected periodâ â it seems intrinsically wrong as well as too high risk. It seems like absurd and dangerous corporate outsourcing. More profits if the Guinea pigs are the test labs.