Popcorn time?
2 Likes
Yes.Popcorn time.This is getting good indeed.
Putin doesn’t like loose ends. I guess he is not so sure of his elites in upcoming presidential elections.
At a time when Putin is riding a wave of public re-evaluation in the West following the Carlson interview, and with The Ukraine collapsing in key areas, for him to have Navalny killed makes little sense. However, Navalny’s death puts the Putin-is-Evil narrative back on track for the Western public, at least momentarily, and perhaps, importantly, for the US Congress and their blocking of funding for the Ukraine.
Navalny represented little threat in the upcoming elections in Russia, and I suspect his death will have little impact either. As always the question of Que Bono? is central, and in answering this it is hard not to conclude that the West is the principal benefactor, at least as far, rather desperately I would suggest, as keeping their narrative afloat. With this in mind, and if Navalny’s death was not altogether natural, who is more likely to be responsible?
5 Likes
It serves Putin. WATCH GERSHKOVICH.
1 Like
Very plausible scenario. Just when Tucker tried (and missed) to humanize Russia and Putin, Navalny goes puff!
Notice I didn’t say murdered or poisoned, all we know he collapsed during the daily walk and ended up in prison hospital.
If that is factual, then penetration of remote Siberian prison in Russia by British or US intel would be an impressive feat.
If there is meddling with the body of some kind, that would be more impressive, since it requires double dead body and disappearance of real Navalny.
I am feeling odd, must be “the looking glass” effect. Better eat some popcorn for resolve.
2 Likes
How about the old Tried & True of him being a C*A asset as has been happening since WWII. 
1 Like