Originally published at: ALLEGED MEMO SAYS GENERAL MCCASLAND TRYING TO ESCAPE SECRET NETWORK
This next weekend will see the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence of the United States from Great Britain. The revolution had already begun prior to the Declaration’s signing, an act which “made it official” and heralded the beginning of seven long years of warfare that ended with the surrender of…
4 Likes
Who makes sure government secrets stay secret, the intelligence agencies. Who’s known to spin yarns, plant false evidence, “unlive” and threaten citizens at will using the latest technology and has media conglomerates by the throat to silence “any noise” about possible disclosure of information deemed secret due to “national security”, intelligence agencies.
2 Likes
… it is when one sees “information” like this that one is reminded that 1) Operation Mockingbird is more than simply alive and well but that it is thriving and 2) that Richard Doty’s 80/20 Disinformation Formula (80% trivially true and 20% mis/dis information with the 80% being what makes one bite down hard on the 20%) is in operation and is being used way more than we think. At this point in time we have NO reason to trust any “government” released information (real or implied or inferred). In fact given your observations …
" I have no doubt that it’s true. But again, we are not told (1) the process of reasoning leading to those requests; and (2) what were the specific requests for? In other words, did Ms. Bondink specifically request this particular piece of information, and if so, how did she know to request it? Or conversely, was the information merely shared - planted? - in whatever materials were released in the FOIA request? The Daily Mail article is unclear.
And that, of course, brings us to the Daily Mail article itself. Notice that the headline reads “Shocking memo reveals missing UFO-linked scientist was trying escape a secret Pentagon network before vanishing.” Yet, in the article which follows, there is no mention whatsoever of a memorandum, nor even if such a memorandum was what was sought in Ms. Bondink’s FOIA request, nor if it was simply included. There’s no mention of a memo at all, and thus not of any of its contents."
… One could make the argument that what is being attempted here is a very subtle attempt to alter the understanding of “how we understand the news” (to paraphrase Neil Postman). First, there is certainly an attempt to “smuggle” in certain premisses as being True (e.g. memo yet no mention or text of proof of the existence of said memo). Second, there is an attempt to use (introduce / infuse / employ?) an alternate semantics (see Henkin Semantics - a strategy for automated reasoning using natural languages). Why do I say this? In this entire discussion there appears to be an attempt to “surpass” the use of the simple informal fallacy of equivocation (in this case I suggest between something being inferred v implied)… Instead of simply shifting the meaning of a word or phrase throughout the “argument” one senses instead the attempt at a “laying over” of a non-explicit ambiguity created by an alternate semantics being used to create a certain kind / type of entailment thus becoming an integral (if not determining in terms of understanding) part of the “argument” itself.
Other things of note … Who exactly is this Sara Bondink? … Who was she before being connected to this “alleged” memo? and Who exactly will she be now? Would she release her financial details before and after the “memo”? … Surely these “missing” scientist incidents must have set off many, many FOIA requests … How many total FOIA requests for information relating to the “missing” scientists were made? … Were there any others who received the same information? … Was she the only one who received this document? Did the many FOIA requests result in any other documents? … Do any of us really believe that these “document” releases aren’t manipulated in some way? … Something is rotten in the state of Denmark and in the world of Hoaxclosure or Dishoaxure (your choice).
3 Likes
Over the years as journalism gradually dropped the “who, what, where, when and how” for reporting, which editors allowed and encouraged to attract more viewers, increase revenues and to appease government and advertisers, the readers and viewers gradually adapted to the new format. It was still called news, but it wasn’t. Dumbing down education wasn’t the only thing dumbed down.
… Yes, interesting stuff. Thanks for posting up your search.
PREDICTION : If the McCasland Case (this “memo” in particular) gains some national traction I predict McCasland’s “suiciding” location (body included) will be the next to be found. It would seem a safe bet that if this one can be “explained away” interest in the others will magically go away.
Remember … “Now … this” idea: the phenomenon whereby the reporting of a horrific event—a rape or a five-alarm fire or global warming—is followed immediately by the anchor’s cheerfully exclaiming “Now … this,” which segues into a story about Janet Jackson’s exposed nipple or a commercial for lite beer, creating a sequencing of information so random, so disparate in scale and value, as to be incoherent, even psychotic.”
― Neil Postman - from Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
2 Likes
If their main objective was to silence those who might counter a disclosure narrative, I’m surprised they let it go on for so long before finding the “suicides”.
Generals (and Senior Executive Service) who have access to highly classified programs for certain have been exposed to deep secrets. They however are only very rarely in possession of personal technical expertise that is of any real value. They are managers only, not experts. I find it hard to believe after his retirement that he would have any significant value as a consultant to continuing classified projects. People who retire / leave positions like this generally just become irrelevant. “trying to get out of special projects” makes no sense. He was out already. The only threat that rises to the level of potential assassination/abduction would be that his mental state made him an uncontrolled disclosure risk because he clearly knew stuff. Whether intentional as a way of clearing conscious, or inadvertant due to declining cognitive ability. I don’t have a theory on why he disappeared. Not sure it really matters, other than possibly spilling the beans he was irrelevant. I’ve heard no evidence he was in contact with any of the mouthpieces in the disclosure community. The other string of disappearances are a curiosity but I don’t see a consistent pattern of work expertise / specialized knowledge from the others (esp a secretary for goodness sake) that makes a good thread out these events.
On the wild speculation side, maybe he was having an affair with Linda Moulton Howe. They both live in ABQ. (bad humor)
1 Like
It’s really beyond me what this is all about.
All i can come up with is a lame…
“They’re” doing this to build a false narrative…
To be developed, in-flux…
Multi-stacked, as needed - through time…
For now…?
It’s just to scare those…
Who think they have to-die-for information.
To seal their Bush-the-Elder lips
1 Like
I agree with the idea of a possible mental condition that this would be a reason for his disappearance.
Daniel Liszt aka Dark Journalist has run several episodes on the General and the other missing persons. In terms of evidence he mentioned the emails between Tom DeLonge and McCasland.
1 Like
And back to the beginning. Who’s to say that a possible mental condition isn’t part of the M.O. of whichever agency that wants him discredited and out of the picture. It’s not like it hasn’t happened before.
3 Likes
He goes for a required check-up.
The paperwork, was done the week before.
The General[problem] is beyond help[Reaction].
A week, before the exam[Solution]
1 Like