Complicity or ignorance which?
Oh, sure⌠yesterday they were wishing people dead who wouldnât bend to sadistic tyranny and coercion; today, we must all forgive and forget, because âwe were all in the dark.â Nice try at damage control. Forgiving everyday human frailties is one thing, but ignoring crimes against humanity is quite another.
How many lives destroyed, how much suffering caused, by lockdowns and injections â when those consequences were completely predictable? But now letâs all sing âKumbayaâ?
Whom you forgive in your own heart is your own business, as far as Iâm concerned. But as for how society should react, how about instead of declaring amnesty, we respect and apply the law? And how about expecting an apology from those who were telling the unmasked they should die?
Or as they say, let by-gones be by-gones. That was then, this is nowâŚI donât think so. Itâs not quite that easy, especially when the perpetrators in charge have an above average IQ.
Complicity is a surething, not ignorance, which is why the perps need amnesty. Although plenty of evidence still exists to implicate the perps here is a good âtimelineâ of the events:
Some things missing from the above Timeline is the direct involvement of the Canadian scientists working at their labs, which had the highest security levels, Level 4. They were working on viruses isolated from African apes, and refining them to be horribly infectious.
Most of work I copied and developed is on an off-line computer for the sake of security. Basically this is a story of how that Canadian lab developed deadly viruses with help from the American military labs in Fort Deadrick, and presumably the purpose of the Canadian labs was to developy an antidote, or cure. It is well known to many folks that such stuff is being, or was being developed in order to âweaponize stuffâ for the purpose of âgerm warfareâ.
The 2 most curious events involved [1] the newly appointed Director of the Canadian Labs, who at the time was the foremost knowlegeble scientist regarding COVID viruses went to Nigeria to give the opening address to a group of scientists about his work at the lab, but before he could get to the event and give his talk he mysteriously disappeared after leaving his hotel, only to later be found dead at a Nigerian hospital.
More couriously though was the fact that before an autopspy could be made to discover the cause of his death his body was cremated.
The next most curious event invloved a Chinese student who on his last day of working at the Canadian lab mentioned above, and who was to make his flight back to China the Royal Mounted Police arrested him before he could board the flight, and they discovered in his suitcase several vials from the lab that were hidden in a pair of his gloves.
Americans basically delivered that to Germany after the war in exchange for all the Nazi black tech projects.
So none of you will be voting for politicians who were vaccinated, and who advocated for vaccination?
Itâs amazingly convenient how all these monsters and demons are always from the OTHER party, isnât it?
Doesnât matter, if they die while in office, we can vote for a different bum.
CAF was trying to figure out a way for them to make a sort of ârestitutionâ if they come forward & tell us all they know, etc. Itâs certainly not amnesty & they donât go free. She hasnât figured it out yet, but I hope she does. I think most, if not all would jump at the chance.
When reading something, one must always try to figure out who the intended audience is. I doubt this is actually targeted at anyone on the Right.
One thing to notice is they arenât saying they were completely wrong, and knowingly engaged in a genocide. Obviously this isnât going to fly with us, so who is this article aimed at? I donât think itâs aimed at suburban females thinking of voting (R) either, as it wonât work on them. I think the target of the article are those like the author, ride-left-or-die Leftists. The problem that needs to be solved is that even they can see some errors that were made, and which they went along with. That might even make them⌠bad people.
âEmily⌠are we the baddies? But there is a whole generation of children that canât recognize facial expressions. And we openly threatened to gulag 1/2 the nation over the flu⌠are you sure we arenât the baddies?â
So to turn this around, they offer up amnesty, an agreement to go back to status quo ante. When we refuse with hysterical laughter, they can say they made the offer, but we turned it down. Only BAD people turn down peace treaties, so obviously the Left is back to being the good guys! Everything would be peaches and cream if the Right accepted that very generous offer of everyone forgetting about ruining childrenâs lives to the point of suicide over a slightly bad flu season.
Where is the evidence for this, please?
Literally almost everyone I know has has had at least one covid jab. I have had three, and will be lining up a 4th before the end of the year.I have also had covid, and did fine, despite having many of the most popular âco-morbiditiesâ.
I donât know anyone personally who has died from covid, jab, or weird other things that could potentially be the jab.
@Zorost
It is nothing but a pendulum swing to keep the same sickness active and going. One of those is âcancel cultureâ and sadly I see cancellation proposals of whole populations of countries being very popular on this forum!
@ebmason
If you think CAF is figuring out how to be a ânutcrackerâ and as a guru going to protect her followers, you are serious in need of waking up to reality!
I donât pretend to know her, but she is all about taking responsability and becoming adults so we all can live free and inspired lives!
As a Christian she knows and honors ârepentanceâ, but she knows what a sword is for too.
Consider yourself fortunate your bubble has not been pricked. I know and have known others not quite so fortunate.
I donât think any such thing. I am well aware of reality.
@Zorost You bring up a point I thought of mentioning myself. The audience is, obviously, readers of The Atlantic â in other words, primarily, middle-class and upper-middle-class committed âliberalsâ living in major urban centers and on the East and West Coasts. So yes, the diehard Democratic voters who think of themselves as the enlightened, as opposed to the âDeplorablesâ et al.
Some of those readers must be smart enough to suspect they supported something that is now harming people. However, a common characteristic of those readers is that they firmly believe they are always on the side of the good and just, and defenders of the weak and vulnerable. They are psychologically incapable of admitting to themselves or anyone else that they may have participated in something harmful or evil. Therefore, they are incapable of admitting they were wrong or of apologizing. PART of the purpose of that article is to assuage their conscience. BUT I donât believe that is the only purpose of the article. Another purpose is to spread the idea that they acted badly because âeverybodyâ was ignorant back then â which, in my view, is utter nonsense.
@FiatLux
Yes, it is always the peper and salt Star Wars model. There is no existential evil. Angels nor Fallen Angels exists for these people and it sometimes drives me up the wall!
It also comes with that other model of Maya. Nothing is real, no material world exists ect. I donât know how it is outside of the Western thinking countries but that new age twatter is so pervasive and ingrained it is harmfull and making people go for nihilism, which is done on purpose I believe.