…between Tucker Carlson and Mike Benz:
9 Likes
Hybrid warfare model used on America.
1 Like
Yup… they’ve turned the whole covert warfare apparatus against us.
2 Likes
I did an experiment with internet search engines. Google and Yandex which is a Russian equivalent. Typed Russian soldier on the Google search bar. Very bad pictures, boring photos, they looked like third world soldiers. Sometimes showing Russian soldiers on the floor with Ukrainians pointing guns at them.
In Yandex did the same, typed Russian soldiers and the pictures showed Russians with all types of gear, winter, jungle, desert, special commando, etc. I went further and wrote American soldier and the variety of pictures was of the same quality.
The search engines are used to herd people to think a certain way.
5 Likes
Loved it!
Great subject matter on censorship and geopolitics.
Goes deep and covers quite a bit of territory.
A Must watch.
3 Likes
Lots of good analysis in this interview, which covers a whole lot of events. Very worthwhile to listen to the entire interview because the guest speaker has very worthwhile opinions. While Dr. Farrell’s analysis is the ‘best’ the fact is the speaker does go into some of the background that is also very important.
As with Dr. Farrell’s analysis, and blogs it will be very worthwhile to ‘listen’ to this different analysis that defines ‘what’s gong on’ from a different Person. The reason is because there is so much ‘going-on’ that it takes a long, long, long Time to hear it said in a different way, or rather to ‘hear-it-said’ from a different viewpoint.
4 Likes
You GOT IT in spades, and in so many important ways!
2 Likes
I think search engines with their algorithms make perception and censorship child’s play to maintain perception control, along with the “news” we are exposed to and allowed to see/ hear. I remember hearing a podcast where the speaker in a matter of fact way mentioned how reporting of this or that event of course was filtered out of a country’s news feed as it was not contributing or countering a narrative.
2 Likes
Cowinkidink? [coincidence]
In June of 2016 shared reality in social media changed.
Twitter, Instagram , Facebook, and others introduced what “they” termed - the algorithmic feed.
Instead of the tried & try chronological order being displayed; social media platforms suddenly went to this proprietary algorithmic feed - that started to mold our experience - by pushing some things; while, at the same time, suppressing other things.
In other word, a new sophistication in censoring by algorithmic feed.
Which ties in with the above video timeline of around June 2016.
Cowinkidnik?
2 Likes
Musk is already caving in with his announcement that from now on algos at X will be preferential towards small and medium accounts instead of big ones.
1 Like
Is Brazil using lawfare to mess with X?
1 Like
Are using Telegram as a test case to get at X?
1 Like
Looks like they’re trying different batches of lawfare[Brazil, France, and more to come] ;
taking notes to see what works, and doesn’t work.[Like they’re doing with covid1984]
Pretty soon; if you find any real truths - that will be where the globalists revolutions are taking place.
3 Likes
A must see primer into the way the world works “behind the curtains.” I believe that Renz’ stated motive in revealing this hidden mechanism (i.e. “if you could only see how the sausage is made you would never eat another sausage”) is too naive and simplistic to be true. Renz would have us believe that his sole objective in pulling back the curtain is to reveal the unseen hand (i.e. the “Blob”) controlling our actions on a macro scale by micro-managing all aspects of our daily lives. Renz is very naive if he believes that, by letting the citizens of Oz see that the Great and Magnificent Wizard is merely a humbug who is a fellow involuntary traveler, we will all suddenly be able to free ourselves from this unseen hand of tyranny. Renz assumes that by revealing the “Blobs” control mechanisms to the world’s population, they will either rise up and overthrow it, or at least ignore it, thereby diminishing its power over us. Renz is obviously too intelligent to believe this will ever happen.
That leaves one to wonder about what Renz’ true objective might be in giving this interview to Tucker (whose father was the first director of Voice of America). My speculation is that the real purpose of the interview was to get everyone to question whether the information they are receiving online (and from mainstream media), is misinformation, disinformation or, even more insidious, malinformation. I propose that the real objective of this interview was to provide malinformation (i.e. information based on fact, but removed from its original context in order to mislead, harm, or manipulate).
My thesis rests solely on the fact that Renz does not attempt to identify the source of this invisible hand that he asserts is controlling the world. Indeed, he merely refers to it as “the Blob”, with any further followup as to who the Blob may be. Without this information, how would anyone desiring to change the status quo ante proceed? It is obvious that Benz has a source of inside knowledge that he has not revealed. I can only deduce two reasons for his reticence (i.e. self-preservation; or, it could be that he is now, or hopes to be, employed by the Blob). Perhaps, he is aspiring for a position in the next administration (regardless of who wins). Only time will tell.
2 Likes
That is certainly The “Image” he wants everyone to take away:
“Renz is just behind free speech on the internet”.
He is simply stating it the way he sees it[or, at least, wants “us” to see it].
Of course, Renz has skin in the game - and as such - will tilt the board’s viewpoints, in his favor.
The Blob is not a bad catch all - as there are many players in this “news” game.
Even, the off-world players.
Of course, he has inside knowledge.
Everyone getting ink; has some inside cards being dealt to them.
The question: Is the information good, bad, or just plain ugly?
For truths can be damn ugly.
I enjoyed his perspective.
It made sense/cents -politically/economically.
But still, there are purposed missing pieces[information].
Information, that requires - a quid pro quo.
That’s the hidden message - that is now being broadcast.
2 Likes
No one person has all the pieces to the “puzzle”. Once the lid is off the puzzle and there’s a thousand pieces in the box, each piece contributes to the image on the cover.
2 Likes
The issue is trust. How much trust do I put into anything I read online (or in the mainstream media or from college professors or government paid scientists)? Renz main message is to alert up to the fact that everything is manipulated to affect ouir behavior.
So, specificly, how does Renz stand to proifit from his website promoting free speech on the internet? The gist of what he is proposing it is to somehow end censorship on the internet and, by so doing, preserve last bastion of free speech — the internet. He provides no remedies as to how he proposes to do this (unless his advocacy is to pressure France to “free Pavel” so that Telegram can still be the bastion of free speech). Somehow, I do not believe Telegram is (or ever was) so securely encrypted that no intellegence service on earth could read its messages. The fact is that most internet encrytion was invented by intelligence services who always keep a back door.
So, the reason that Pavel is being incarcerated is probably the same as Assange was detained ---- to keep him incommunicado until he agrees to have Telegram censored or until he is no longer a threat. The French and their NATO masters want to control Telegram for propaganda and disinformation purposes. That control is what is being euphemisticly called “censorship”. I am always suspicious when people advocating free speech are doing so from the very platforms being used to enslave us.
Regardless, I have always asked cui bono when evaluating motives for peoples actions ---- especially when they are making recommendations for action at no charge.
3 Likes
What you say is true. My question is: Who made the puzzle?
1 Like
There is much more to Telegram, than meets the eye.
Perhaps the most damning is: telegram’s NFT’s[non transferable tokens].
With over a billion subscribers and the ability to pay in these tokens - outside Telegram.
Makes it - a considerable threat.
Then there’s the two brothers, being nothing more than - tokens themselves.
An elaborate front for Russia[or, maybe a group?]?
No.
There is more more here.
Many levels of hidden agendas.
4 Likes
That’s my thinking too, Robert.
America had its Promise Inslaw debacle in the 80ties. Perfect trojan horse that was sold to many foreign countries including allies.
Now it is Russia’s turn. Let’s not forget that Russians are one of the best if not the best programmers in the world. Durov might be just a figure head and entire team of coders and cryptologists on the Kremlin payroll could be behind Telegram software.
It is probably a multifaced weapon, providing intel, money laundering opportunities and proto CDBC capabilities in one, and its used worldwide. Scale that Maxwells could only dream of, when they were selling Promise software to US intel communities.
By the way, I for one don’t have any doubt that Windows program is nothing else than surveillance program. US intel doesn’t like competition especially when their interests are being interrupted by it, hence they most likely made a move on Durov and Telegram.
3 Likes