And Then They Came For "The": Associated Press Warns Use Of The Article Can Be "Dehumanizing"

The war on “The” has begun. Link to full article below.

And Then They Came For “The”: Associated Press Warns Use Of The Article Can Be "Dehumanizing"

The Associated Press has announced that the article “the” should be avoided in many circumstances because it is “dehumanizing.”

It warns writers to avoid saying things like “the French” as offensive. It does not seem that we can even just add an[ x like Latinx.

It is not a gender thing so “thx” will not suffice. It is now an article of faith to stop using the article “the” in referencing groups.

It is reminiscent of Winston Churchill who was chastised for ending a sentence with a preposition. He responded by showing the artificiality of avoiding an ending preposition: “This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put.”

The AP declared that:

“We recommend avoiding general and often dehumanizing ‘the’ labels such as the poor, the mentally ill, the French, the disabled, the college-educated. Instead, use wording such as people with mental illnesses. And use these descriptions only when clearly relevant.”

Even the French Embassy responded with “Le” scorn.

By the way, if you are thinking of objecting to “the grammar police,” think again. It will just establish that you are a dehumanizing monster.

What concerns me most is that this dehumanizing article has lingered in the English language for so long without being noticed until now. Even The editors of The Associated Press are shadowed with this vile, dehumanizing word. It is literally lurking on every computer and in every dictionary.

The only option is decisive action. AP must take its ox cart through the streets and call on people to bring out their “thes” for proper disposal.

As for any French people encountered along the way, simply refer to them as “people associated with the nation of France.”

3 Likes

… What will the punk band the THE do? … can we also not say “those French”, “those poor”, “those people” and so on? It seems as if there is a “war” on demonstrative pronouns (e.g. this, that, these, and those), Maybe “they” don’t want any language that point some object(s) out as being distinct from other object(s) … To use demonstrative pronouns it seems one must observe the properties and characteristics of objects. Maybe this is really a “war” on the skill of observation.
STOP observing! If one is not careful one might observe some unexpected event. And after all if one “observes” an unexpected event one might even acquire a new belief or two in response to observing that unexpected event. Hmmmmm … maybe this is an attempted linguistic short circuiting of belief acquisition. To paraphrase Paul Virilio … we must avoid allowing others to see for us.

2 Likes
2 Likes

My speculations. Somebody or some thing is whittling away at humanity via language again. Corporations already get away with murder in many locales literally so now ‘they’ can lump the rest us of into the great corporate collective as we will be corporate property once everyone gets the right jab and/or whatever other concoction they give us to make ‘us’ their property. Mrna etc. If we can kill an animal and eat it, why can’t they? The real sporting ones will probably want to hunt us down first. Am I making a leap off the "end of the twig? You tell me. It’s already been included in the Canadian and American version of the narrative.

Here’s a full episode.

@ddrogos
Welcome! Buckle up!

2 Likes

I can’t stop laughing.
The best comedy of insanity going.
This will be hard to top!

2 Likes

Are you sure? I’ll bet the term nation would get you in trouble with the/those/these wannabe grammar police!

4 Likes

It looks to me like epistemological warfare – a sort of Weltanshauungskrieg. On another level, it’s yet more bending over backwards to signal one’s adherence to the camp of “the good,” whose self-image and social status depend on believing, and striving to make others believe, that they wouldn’t dream of dehumanizing anyone. It’s a lot cheaper to avoid saying “the poor” than to take money out of your pocket or time out of your schedule to help . . . uh . . . how would the grammar Gestapo phrase it? … people adjacent to systemic poverty.

1 Like

@FiatLux “people adjacent to systemic poverty.”
Love it! :rofl:

2 Likes

BINGO! Fiat (so that the post meets the minimal criteria of 20 characters. Ooops, apologies I said “the post”, and “the minimal”)

3 Likes