https://www.rokfin.com/post/80978/Panel-Russia-the-Great-Teset-Resistance-or-Complicity
2 Likes
In the end I suppose it depends how “tainted with evil” citizens of a country are and choose leaders accordingly. One can “classify” groups all one want and quibble which one has the most clout and the resulting discussion will be interesting but it never leads to solutions.
In the end the whole world ended up in this world situation because individuals are not prepared to look at their own responsability to being a person in relation to their own evil. For me, a more relevant question is, am I born a human and or born to devellop my humaness and what is that?
In that, I see the Western-world being the EU + USA + Commonwealth are in the advanced proces of erasing “individualism” and swapping it with a borg-style civilization. That group want it world-wide and their current adversaries less so.
Simply look at history, do you see much “diversity” in asian societies like Japan and China? The only leader with Chistian inclinations is Mr. Putin. How Christian serious and inclined he is and wants keeping Russia diving of a cliff into total darkness like most word leaders are, is anybodies quess.
In the end “evil” has to be recognized one person a time and one has to learn to deal with “evil” accordingly. Can a world leader influence that, maybe, but why depend on that as a deternining factor and do nothing in the mean time?
Evil is a personal problem that severely disrupts group function and therefore intrinsically related. Current societies have problems recognizing the problem let alone providing a resolution!
3 Likes
The “Borg” is coming; although not in an easily identifiable TV presentation;
in fact, all the news is “good” - when it comes to “their” Re-Set TV $pecial presentation$.
Your analyses of an individual being swapped out for a “borg-style’” civilization is an apt one.
2 Likes
I enjoyed the debate but good discussion aside I tend to jump direct @ the problem in todays climate due to time constraint.
1 Like
New Head of Russia’s Central Bank
"Above all, she is considered to be Putin’s protégé…’
Who’s side is she on? Putin must know…or is he setting her up?
1 Like
This is a key factor from my perspective as well:
Either Putin’s keeping his enemies close; or “they’re keeping a close watch on Putin.”
1 Like
Hey, Robert,
I rather think Prez.Putin is using this opportunity to root out his own Deep State.
Should be interesting.
4 Likes
Yes indeed.
I’m just about finished w/a political thriller I’m reading,
This Is the Night They Come For You by Robert Goddard.
Your analyses reminds me of what I read, late last night.
Basically it concerns two words that were defined in the novel’s glossary:
Le Pouvoir: The description applied by Algerians to the secret power structure believed to dictate political events in the country; Hirak Frausa: Literally “The Party of France”, a malign secret network dedicated to undermining Algeria, believed by some Algerians to have been seeded within their society by de Gaulle at independence to ensure their country would never prosper.
There is somewhat a parallel to Russia, when looking at the CIA Yeltsin stooge and
the Rape of Russia. Whoever was pulling the strings, was also planting seeds.
In a dialogue a character says, Oh blackmail, bribery, coercion - the usual ploys. By the summer of sixty-one our agents were threaded through your ranks like veins of blue in a Roquefort cheese. That had always been the Chief’s final line of defense: fight the enemy from within.
The later the novel comes to present day, Our agents still take our francs and our favours. They still do our bidding. And your government has no idea who they are, because there are so many of them inside your government[USSA and communists?] making sure they have no idea. If one of you was one of ours - for the sake of argument - the other wouldn’t know, wouldn’t suspect, wouldn’t see the traitor standing beside him. Under the guise of independence[Federalists Paper’s subject matter], we’ve imprisoned you in a hall of mirrors.
The above, maybe writ large across the “nations” of globalization.
Traitors[not human] by the score; countless, as you can’t see him standing next to you.
[But, I wager; it wouldn’t take long for a bona fide student of Dr. Farrell to sniff them out.
Even, if they themselves, had no idea(brainwashed/mind-controlled)].
2 Likes
Like a CD( compact disc), where if you break it into pieces that you discard most of them, they can still reconstitute the entire disc, without flaws, or, as you say, veins of blue, where the mycelium or penicillium can still grow back. But he who sees the compact disc may hold it and decide if it plays or not.
Think KriĹźna with the blue skin carrying the CD on/at his fingertip, at his command, beck and call.
My guess (and it’s no more than a guess) is that it’s not as black-and-white as being for or against the Great Reset.
It may be a mistake to assume that because Russia or China participates in Davos, or because they put out official statements supporting the Great Reset agenda, that they’re planning to take orders from Herr Schwab and his handlers. How many countries are signed on to this or that international organization or treaty, and how many of them respect all the terms of those organizations and treaties? In my opinion, it would be a mistake to assume a country’s official statements represent its actual policy.
For example, if there’s going to be a United Nations Security Council, no major power wants to be left out of the club – whether they agree with the official goals of the organization or not. Ditto for the WEF. We’re dealing with a bunch of mafia bosses who all want a seat at the big boys’ table. From time to time, this or that mafia family with cooperate with a rival one when it’s to their advantage. But that won’t stop them from competing for a bigger piece of the world’s technological or commercial pie. Nor will it stop them from taking each other out in “mafia wars,” which will often get played out on a grand scale as wars between countries.
As for getting on board with all the creepy, liberty-squashing tracking technology that’s so dear to our would-be technocratic overlords, and the totalitarian systems promoted by the WEF, I’d be surprised if there’s a major government in the world that will forgo the chance to have more control over its people, if it can.
6 Likes