Ashton Forbes 45 minute interview with Alex jones. Appears the zero point energy movement will be taken over by the alexjones front

https://x.com/JustXAshton/status/1730739689152184814

2 Likes

Like…WHOAH!!! Thanks for posting this! “…phase stage change…” is that what he said?! Gene Decode has posted on his site a 1972 article from the LA Times about the maglev that goes from NYC to LA in 21 min…10,000 MPH!!! Think what they might have now!!! :dizzy_face:

1 Like

Anything to avoid using the term Aether is the name of the game.

2 Likes

https://x.com/JustXAshton/status/1832256583838875671

https://x.com/JustXAshton/status/1832257262359822604

https://x.com/JustXAshton/status/1831097589803921579

For better or worse it appears Mr Forbes has been chosen by the algorithm to be the journalist who leads to the slow drip to public awareness

1 Like

Thanks for posting these, patriceoneal!! What else can they do that we don’t know about??? :dizzy_face:

Additional video-
Former Lockheed Martin Engineer and Pilot Don Phillips said he witnessed orbs create a circle formation and then “disappear.” This interview was posted in 2013

https://x.com/ACEtvx/status/1832905126316487056

.

1 Like

This video is one of the best attempts at persuasion I have seen. Only someone with advanced skills in video graphics design software could produce.

Assuming that the poster is sincere, he obviously believes that this video is proof that advanced technologies utilizing theoretical physics exist. However, his presumptions about who is behind the advanced technology are wild speculation probably based on personal bias with little or no grounding in fact. I hate to speculate, but it is clear that the poster has an agenda that he is promoting and that he is seeking viewers. I will leave it to the reader to speculate on the poster’s motives.

On the other hand, presuming the video is not a fake, it clearly demonstrates advanced technology being deployed for an unknown purpose by unknown parties. If that is the case, it was not deployed in response to an accidental fire. Such techology would not be used in such a thoughtless manner if detection of the technology was to be avoided. Deployment of such a technology would have had to have a purpose that could not have been achieved in some other manner. Any utilization of such technology would have had to have been authorized, planned and prepared well in advance of the flight. All of which factors work against this event being caused by an accidental fire.

Regardless, no one is going to accept the video as proof that advanced technology was being utilized without a very good reason to do so. Speculation as to possible motives about the origin of the technology is not evidence. The poster must provide more facts to prove his theories as to who, or what, is behind the use of this technology.

1 Like