Why is Forbes pushing the laughable narrative that Joseph Farrell and Ken Wheeler are somehow “in denial” about the technology involved in the MH370 incident? Forbes has become a caricature of itself, an outlet that blindly parrots electromagnetic and plasma theory as if it’s cutting-edge, while never escaping the stale, limited framework of glorified Maxwellian transverse wave mechanics. He pretends to explore the frontier, but never leaves the sandbox. Meanwhile, his go-to sources, Pais, Puthoff, Elizondo, Levi, and the rest of that Pentagon-approved vaudeville act, are either open military disinformation agents or clueless mouthpieces regurgitating digestible myths of quantum mysticism for public consumption. It’s not skepticism, it’s controlled narrative management masquerading as science. Forbes does not possess the intellectual horsepower to understand the basis of the technology. Full stop.
There’s a little bit of science here, for anyone who needs to hear/learn how an echo chamber works.
At this point, I will not believe he is a well meaning Zoomer who got overly excited after watching a bunch of Tesla documentaries. He is deployed to steer the narrative into CIA approved sources.
Trouble in paradise?? Joseph P. Farrell dodge a bullit in hindsight with that DeLonge figure!
Thanks for sharing. I can’t stand the automated voiceover, but I get why it’s used. As for LE, he was always the easiest to peg as a total fraud. Just listen to him talk. That is not the voice or mind of a highly intelligent man, he radiates mediocrity dressed up in jargon which he has memorized.
Castro Cuban?
I think he means formerly of a line which goes back to Mesopotamia, Castro is Iranian by birth and blood.
I don’t understand why there is such a controversy. At the time I did that interview with George Ann Hughes, and suggested that “it just went ‘poof’”, I did so on the basis of an argument-by-elimination, as none of the theories being advanced at that time (about three weeks after the incident) made any sense to me. At that time, there were no videos available publicly such as the one reviewed by Mr. Forbes, who is advancing a very different type of argument than I did. At the time I made my comments, the stories about military exercises in that area of the seas was just beginning to percolate, and that is what suggested to my mind an exotic technology in play. But without any further stories or data, I did not argue for any particular version of “it just went ‘poof’”. I merely suggested it as a possibility. I remain open to that idea, and have since I first made the statement, though I have gone back and forth on how strong a possibility I think it to be. I have seen Mr. Forbes’ video, but I am not competent enough to evaluate the claims he makes for its authenticity nor for what he maintains it is showing. I remain skeptical of any government-sourced material, especially that coming from so-called UFO whistleblowers, but as far as I understand the story, Mr. Forbes has not revealed who the source is or was (not do I recall if he is personally familiar with that source). So my attitude is that I remain :“open but skeptical” about the video and the claims, simply waiting for some sort of independent corroboration of it, which, as far as I know, has not yet appeared.
@omnimatter … Well … i (for one) dont find Ashton any more bizaar than say Kerry Cassidy … Whitley Streiber … Alex Jones … Archaix … Courtney Brown … David Wilcock and thousands of others claiming wide notions … I find him VERY interesting … Everyone has a piece of the puzzle … Just move on … It’s your opinion and this is mine … The End!
“The Event” TV series.
Dr. Farrell, Mr. Forbes is clearly unfamiliar with your body of work. He, or someone in his orbit, isolated a clip from your interview with George Ann and used it out of context to misrepresent your speculation on the matter. He didn’t even realize the clip was from 2014; he mistakenly assumed it was recent. Forbes is an amateur, and the speed of his rise on social media, along with his immediate access to establishment-approved figures in the so-called alternative physics space—is, to put it mildly, highly suspicious.
Excellent news, thank you.
From memory I believe Mr. Lin plead guilty and did 7 years or so in federal prison. Mr. Forbes being pushed by the algorithm for the past year and a half extremely hard by twitter, tells me everything I need to know. I am thankful for his theories (even though I don’t necessarily believe anything about them except its most likely tremendous disinfo and meme implanting in the culture) in that it helped me discover Giza Death Star and become a member, after previously enjoying CAF and your speeches at the secret space conference.
The footage Forbes is pushing as his major ‘disclosure’ video was recreated using open access AI footage from public programming. Forbes is either willful participant or a woeful ignoramus.
Honestly, I just joined Giza Death Star very recently, but…this post is sort of disappointing. I can see OP has seen a couple of Forbes’s videos, but not nearly enough for the critiques being leveled. Why is this happening? Why do you feel the need to put down Forbes? Why are other people jumping on the bandwagon? Seriously, what is the point of this?
Just the fact that OP calls Elizondo one of Forbes’s “go-to sources” disqualifies him/her from commenting on the subject. Anyone vaguely familiar with Forbes’s content knows that Elizondo is one of Ashton’s most frequent targets of mockery and derision.
Here is a typical example from just a few weeks ago, wherein the first 30 minutes of Forbes’s video is completely dedicated to a rant against Elizondo (along with Corbell, Knapp, Grusch, et al.) just after the twenty year veteran of US Intelligence produced that “flying saucer” photograph that was proven to be a drainage system within 12 hours. Forbes’s video is literally called “Disclosure Trainwreck Reactions - Puthoff, Davis, Loeb, & Elizondo,” making OP’s assertion absurd. In Forbes’s Hard Truths podcast that dropped today, he calls Puthoff ‘part of that whole government crowd pushing for partial disclosure.’ (This is a paraphrase.) I’m just saying OP’s critique is divorced from the actual content. Here’s a two hour video dedicated to publicly exposing/disgracing Elizondo https://www.youtube.com/live/AixitHpDaJg?si=U3xhZYewlWxDg4U9.
My bigger point is that OP fundamentally doesn’t understand Ashton Forbes and what he’s doing. Saying “Forbes does not possess the intellectual horsepower to understand the basis of the technology. Full stop” is like saying Robert Temple or Joseph P. Farrell aren’t astrophysicists. Did either claim to be? You’re missing what these people are doing. Ashton Forbes is a healthcare IT worker-cum-YouTuber who has dedicated his life to proving the leaked MH370 videos to be legit. Along the way, he’s learned quite an impressive amount of science to make his case. If that’s not cutting edge enough for folks, fine, I guess, but it’s a non sequitur as far as a critique of what Forbes is doing.
What Forbes is doing is making the case that the US government (Air Force) in conjunction with CIA and Lockheed Martin, along with private company Sierra Nevada, used four plasma orbs to teleport flight MH370 through a wormhole to Daniel Garcia Air Force Base and filmed the whole thing with high-def 3-D infrared cameras. Ashton Forbes has amassed an extraordinary amount of evidence to back up these extraordinary claims.
I will be the first to admit that Forbes’s personality can frequently be off-putting and obnoxious. But I also happen to think he’s pretty darn smart. The point is, who cares? The reason I watch his videos is because his evidence is extremely compelling. Maybe it’s all hopelessly outdated government propaganda, and I’m a moron, but it strikes me as extremely convincing. I think more people should be checking it out instead of dismissing it for made-up reasons.
I’ve been critiquing Forbes and his insufferable grift for 6 months. Do some forum research before whining. Forbes is physics illiterate.
And … for those STILL interested … This is a fabulous interview …
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDxlzneVrDGL
