Can't Get This Question on Skinwalker Ranch posted LIVE on Dark Journalist

Hmmmmmm … trying to post the following:

DOES DJ THINK THE CIA NEST AT SKINWALKER RANCH (AND THE UAP FOLKS THERE ALSO) NEED TO BE CALLED / POINTED OUT IN THE SAME WAY HE HAS THE TTSA ET AL.?

… as G. Carlin said – I must not be in THE CLUB. :slight_smile:

3 Likes

I had trouble posting comments too… I honestly don’t know what he thinks of the Skinwalker ranch (or of the series for that matter)

Maybe Ms Olivia assumed the question was from a BOT and blocked it? She does control and filter them.

Maybe allcaps is screened out?

1 Like

I believe everyone struggled through the stream last night,as it crashed repeatedly and questions were not going through on neither first nor second attempt,so Olivia probably had a hard time screening them and keep track

ScrewYouTube does have its own brand of censorship, and will not involve persons such as Olivia at all:

,in that:
U-tube actively stops any messaging that “violates” rules, and that may entail complete rubbing out of posts that to-day’s programmer deems illegitimate.
“Crashing” might be the algo’s attempt to rectify, as an example, censorship situations.
Pretty sure that using “CIA” and “Skinwalker” in a sentence is a deep algorithm no-no, anyway you look at it…

1 Like

I didnt say "Olivia is involved in censoring AT ALL either, I said it could have been difficult for her to keep of track of it all if messages were constantly in and out of her system, as it crashed all the time…
Seemed like everyone had problems and my stream crashed 5-6 times without writing in anything at all.,so if the problems was because YT was in censor-mode,it would probably be DJ’s stream they had a problem with and not the question about “Skinwalker ranch”

1 Like

Olivia seemed very stressed and the questions/comments which did get airtime seemed belligerent and caustic, and as others here have said, their questions were not showing up.

… one odd thing was that my comments would show up in the chat stream on my computer but would not show up on the live stream next to the video. As an experiment I copied the same text 5 times and attempted to post with the same result each time. It would show up on my computer screen but not on the live stream next to the video. The next experiment was to chop the post in half … posting the first part as a separate post with the second part post following immediately. The first time I tried the “chopping” the two posts appeared with one following the other. The second time I tried the same tactic it did not work.

it also appears that there are several other moderators besides Olivia.

WuWu … it strikes me as odd that YT would have such a “rule” given that the show itself regularly makes references to and mention of the connection(s) between Bigelow, Fugal, Taylor, the UAP committee and report, DARPA and so on. That kind of rule would seem such an after the fact “finger in the dike” attempt. But … who knows … :slight_smile:

DJ , I think, is/was able to dodge the algos at YouTube by mixing frequently pop esoterica and occult with current political events quite evenly, but lately politics dominate in his shows so algos are catching it up .

1 Like

All of mine showed up.
If a question, I always use: @Olivia Wingsgirl before the question.

2 Likes

Scarm & ScarmCo., even considering that there may be no such Rule from “You Tube, you!” or even the allegedly lovely Ms.Olivia, the programmer-of-the-day, who is at least temporarily on YouDupe’s payroll, will attempt to prove the worth of his existence, which is to say to keep his/her/its job, by toadying up to his bosses in whatever way pertinent, even if they have not been asked to so do . If that means writing an enormous piece of programming code, that just might have the unfortunate side effect of booting almost everyone from their account, then that is what happens on that day, with that programmer. If it means writing a genius self-referential bit of code that might root out extremist talk, that can be slotted into any other program neatly, then that is what happens that day, even if that code kills every existing and future comment on the platform. And that programmer/programesse keeps getting paid.
It does seem though that DJ is at least moderately “hands-off” material.