CERN is shutting down today until 2030

CERN bids farewell to the LHC and enters Long Shutdown 3

https://home.cern/cern-bids-farewell-to-the-lhc-and-enters-long-shutdown-3/

5 Likes

Must be bad weather coming: economic, miltary or biological can’t say really, perhaps all three. Last time they closed we had the financial crash which followed. Just sayin’!

2 Likes

Parial shutdown?
Hidden CERN side going dark…?
Without the highly-visible Public nuisance side?

1 Like

I find the first three videos interesting on this substack.

2 Likes

… so they say … :slight_smile:

(additional characters required for comment to post)

1 Like

“So they say” goes without saying…but I was hoping someone would say it :slight_smile:

"First rule in government spending: Why build one when you can have two at twice the price?..only THIS one can be kept secret…

1 Like

I thought China built one.

1 Like

Maybe just a global financial reset this time?

1 Like

https://phys.org/news/2025-12-cern-upbeat-china-halts-particle.html

https://international-relations.web.cern.ch/stakeholder-relations/states/china

3 Likes

China/CERN…
Going to… ?
THE DARKSIDE; Side by Side.

I think what’s most bothersome to me about this is the target date of 2030. The elitist neocon events that I’ve seen always seem to target 2030 as the completion date. The WEF throws this date around all of the time as do so many others. Why? Why 2030? If you follow Armstrong’s Cycle Model (and the elitist neocons do), he maintains that their plans will fail no matter what and that the long cycle bottoms out at 2032. So what is it about their mantra of 2030? Do they think that they can get the agenda moving by 2030 and CERN maybe has something to do with that? Do they think that if they can accomplish their goals by 2030, then somehow they will override the cycle? Is CERN a part of that plan?

3 Likes

Do “THEY” think it’s a Matter of Life and/or Death?
The near 80% Depopulation Deaths for: Their Sorry 1% smelly arses?
[i.e., FAMINE?]

@toddb watch the first three videos. They are all short but the second one I find really interesting. It explains the possibilities of our timeline(s) and why TPTB could be in such a rush knowing they will still lose.

Interesting, but based upon:
Garbage in; Garbage out.
IMO
Loved the sci-fi concept.
The near opposte of Leonard Cohen’s, Everybody Knows

Well one man’s garbage is another man’s treasure.

2 Likes

Or the were successful, maybe, or got themselves in a complete pickle. Something like it. @Sal2lee Yeah, this isn’t the first time they’ve messed with something like this and got us in deep dew.

2 Likes

Thanks @Sal2lee. First video wouldn’t play for some reason, but I think I’ve seen it. I’ve also seen the 2nd video several times before. While I do believe that Looking Glass was/is a real project, I have a lot of issues when videos like that are made with no references. Any time I hear “whistleblower”, the flags go up and the buzzers and bells go off immediately. It’s rarely possible to prove that a “whistleblower” is who they say they are and next to impossible to verify what they’ve worked on. As for the 3rd video, again, this is the kind of info that wouldn’t be known unless you were actually one of the elites who was directly controlling this. Though the stories are great stories that are woven together and seem to make sense intellectually, they’re still stories backed up by nothing. I’m thinking that we’re not going to really know for sure until we actually get to 2030!

2 Likes

@toddb I guess that’s my point, they are stories with out the academia behind it. Sometimes just stories resonate with me more than “proof” by the “experts “. For example, if we all know God wins, why do TPTB still play? I liked the chess board analogy because it made sense to me why my reality gets more and more diluted. My intellect is no where near most Gizers but my intuition has always been beneficial to me. I trust myself more than others.

2 Likes