I’m thinking a trained sniper vs a “lunatic” narrative is more likely. I also see a possible deep state angle as opposed to someone being paid to do the “left’s” bidding. I didn’t follow him regularly, but from what I heard yesterday he resonated with a sizable portion of the younger generation. Because of this he may have been viewed as a big problem for more than just the “left” per se. RIP and prayers for his family.
I was up late, so in my previous post I wasn’t sure if it should be “left’s” or “lefts” so I decided to Google a mock sentence(s) and these came up!
and
There is no left or right political paradigm except in the heads of the brainwashed. More likely this sad event is to sneak “whatever” thru when everyone’s eyes are fixed on this event. These days live is meaningless and used as tools in every shape and form.
In a world where everything is scripted, sanitised, edited in pro tools or chat gpt, we must listen to the unscripted, those who speak from the heart and are INTERESTED in the welfare of us all.
Perhaps the biggest threat to TPTB was just that image of sitting around a table and discussing our differences.
It does not suit their weapons of choice, digital mediums of dissemination, narrative control, shaping and manufacturing consent.
They will kill to prevent it.
That should remind us all what they are afraid of.
I condem what has happened to Charlie Kirk, but I think a sliver stuck somewhere hot on the planet would vehemently disagree. Lets not get carried away he was some kind of humanitarian saint either! I admired his rhetoric skills, but not all of his political leanings.
I certainly don’t have any illusions about Charlie Kirk, I am emphasising interest in relation to the audience. Gen Z and to a lesser extent Millennials have been weened on digital versions of reality.