Is Mr. Armstrong being used as a messenger or a disinformation pawn. They called him?
Just what i was musing about.
Tough to stay focused in a world that is awash in poisoned data streams.
Still, I like his surface analyses.
Some of the basics remain true.
Haven’t run into anyone better than Dr. Farrell.
However; it doesn’t stop me from throwing in a line, to see whose biting…
AND, being baited…
… Bill, Bill, Bill … there is a reason why you and I do not have a podcast. Listen to a “show” (and we have to keep in mind they are following in the footsteps of Rush Limbaugh’s Infotainment - these are all Infotainment and we must think of them and consider them as such - nothing more) Alex Jones, Nicholas Fuentes, even Daniel Liszt what phrase do you hear at least once every hour (if not much more frequently) … “My sources tell me …” Bill, you and I have NO sources … except for what we read and reason through.
Second we must always remember the Richard Doty Intelligence “Dissemination” Formula. 80% true but meaningless crap and 20% hardcore dis / misinformation / deception (the totally lying part).
The 80% true (but useless) is used to get the recipient of the information to bite down hard on the 20%.
Each of these podcasters make the claim that they “rely” on sources that have provided a high degree of accuracy. This “high degree accuracy” claim is nothing if that is based on the true but trivial 80%.
