… interesting what one finds reading around in the Medical Literature … I find that the more I look at recent publications (and some from awhile ago) the less I am surprised.
No doubt in my mind that congenital transmissibility is 100%. Horrible…
… I’m glad that I do see some inquiry into questions that should and would have been asked in the 20 - 30 years that it should have taken for the vaccine to be approved and come to market. The claim that a “safe and effective” vaccine could be developed in 12-18 months should have been a HUGE RED FLAG to EVERYONE.
Given the obvious attempts during distribution of the vaccine to create large N control groups for comparison is an indication that absolutely 0 (zero) thought was given toward human safety in this process. I just don’t see how ANY meaningful inquiry into such vitally important questions could have been made during vaccine development given the “speed” of the process.
A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub