The study along with the NDD/ASD studies are hot off the press. We will hear no complaints about inadequate sample sizes.
1 Like
They’ll lie about it like always. The 2+ mil sample size is great but so was the 10+ mil for the V-Safe study and they ignored it.
18.30 (95% CI, 17.66-18.93) vs 14.24 (95% CI, 12.91–15.57) for depression
28.41 (95% CI, 27.62–29.21) vs 20.27 (95% CI, 18.68–21.86) for anxiety
28.85 (95% CI, 28.05–29.96) vs 12.19 (95% CI, 10.96–13.43) for sleep disorders
Meanwhile, depression (p < 0.001), anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders (p < 0.001), sleep disorders (p < 0.001), and sexual disorders (p = 0.007) showed significantly higher cumulative incidence in the vaccinated group than in the non-vaccinated group.
Let’s now get a follow up of these people, in nonNative EMF enviro i.e. EMF polluted vs Relative EMF clear areas?
This is a great idea, but at this point, outside of a facility buried deep beneath the Earth’s surface, I’m not sure where one could effectively control for non-native radiation. Soviet studies from the 1960s demonstrated that isolating a biological system from the native electromagnetic field (EMF)—generated by the natural interactions between the planet and its star—can be just as harmful as exposure to high-density, non-native radiation. Thus, the challenge isn’t simply about blocking radiation; it’s about designing a system capable of filtering out the “noise” signals while preserving the essential native EMF. This requires a nuanced approach, akin to creating a high-precision bandpass filter that selectively attenuates disruptive frequencies while allowing beneficial ones to pass through.
1 Like
Oh if only i had access to the money to properly do just this.
I would be happy to live there forever!