So…I saw in my email box a title from one of my subscribed feeds, Color of Change PAC called “Anti-CRT = Anti Progress.” CRT, as you may know, is the acronym for “Critical Race Theory” that Conservatives have been ranting about on Fox news. But…as per that article I mentioned above, by Cynthia Chung, the “Critical” in Critical Race Theory stems from the Frankfurt School, who was founded by Max Weber who was involved in that Swiss village of Bohemians into anarchism, destroying culture, so that they could turn humanity into a mass of unthinking ungulates dancing to the tune of Tavistock-derived dissonant music (“Join In the Chant!” by Nitzer Ebb, anyone?)
(See: The Origins of the Counterculture Movement: A Gathering of Anarchists, Occultists and Psychoanalysts for a New Age )
I myself am not a fan of CRT because I’m not a fan of “critical” anything. Does that mean I am anti-progress? Does that mean I’m some kind of stupid, reactionary Conservative who wants to preserve White Supremacy? Because, see, yesterday I praised and promoted a guy on my Facebook feed called Thomas Sankara, who was a marxist and nationalist who, in 4 short years in his country of Burkina Faso: outlawed FGM, promoted women to positions of power, resisted/refused the IMF, made his country self sufficient in grain/cereal/wheat production, raised literacy by more than double, not to mentioned stopped using Mercedes, private chauffers, and private jets and used instead a Pugeot. Quite rare for a head of state in a world where you’re supposed to believe a norm that says: “Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.” In Africa, a continent that has a reputation for APCA long-lived filthy rich Dictators For LIFE, Sankara became exceptional not only in Africa terms but in World terms. He was assassinated, demonized by the world establishment as a human rights denier.
Sankara may have called himself a Marxist, but you can’t argue with: lower infant mortality rates, higher education, self sufficiency in food production, and women being promoted, when everybody else around you is floundering in misery induced by IMF/World Bank exploitation / austerity supporting feudal winner-take-all kleptocrats.
See, there really IS good and bad on both sides! Donald Trump was kind of right. But that means there are good marxists too. Good antiracists. The real question is What is good on both sides and what is bad? That discernment is key, knowing which elements of both sides are controlled by what factions of the Deep State, etc.
Antiracists who build up, rather than tear down, are good. Because, see, if you have railroads, good jobs, industry, in your country, and high literacy, large middle class, then the world looks upon that and can’t say anything. If the average African person is educated, middle class, living a good life of prosperity and freedom, in a safe society where everyone is free to walk and drive about at night because war has been eliminated and a reasonable expectation of having their rights protected is secured, then no White person outside Africa can say anything negative. No one can make stupid wisecracks and jokes about Blacks and Africa. Ha Joon Chiang, Industrial Policy proponent discussed this when he mentioned how more prosperous nations such as England and France looked down on Germany, before Friedrich List transformed his country, as backward. Similarly, Asians were viewed more negatively and perjoratively before Asia’s transformation and the Belt and Road Initiative, New Silk Road, and industrialization enriched their society. Because, as they say, nothing succeeds like success. The proof is in the pudding. Africa has been deliberately sabotaged and made into an arrested state of development by the elite world controllers and it has reflected badly on Blacks. Hence, it has promoted racist beliefs. Now, CRT, because its “critical” and thus is all about tearing down institutions, rather than building up institutions, promises to advance actual racism even more. As neighborhoods with defunded police, defunct institutions, and failing infrastructure plunges society further into a dystopian hellscape, then this give people even MORE ammunition to view Blacks negatively. Which serves the oligarchical, technocrat class. That may have been the intention all along, to further destroy the middle class and destroy any hope of building a Black middle class by destroying small and medium sized business.
Because CRT is connected/advanced by that same DAVOS/Reset/Technocratic Feudalist crowd who advocates a Malthusian agenda of Zero sum game depopulation scarcity, we must reject it. But not reject it in favor of equally stupid knee jerk right wingism. We must take control of language, control language, and invent new language. Because control of language gives you power. We must take back Anti-Racism from its hijacked state and turn it back on a course for good instead of evil.
So with the spirit of “Words Have Power” I’d like to create a new distinction/phraseology/terminology to distinguish a constructive, alternative, antiracism to their destructive, critical anitracism. I now present:
CREATIVE ANTI RACISM,
vs
CRITICAL ANTI RACISM,
Creative Anti Racism can include concepts such as “Antigravity is Antiracist” (because antigravity technology levels the playing field by eliminating the Maritime/Naval monopoly on power and gives landlocked nations equal access to wealth/commerce/trade/economy.
Creative Anti Racism accommodates the idea of inventions destroying racism by enlarging the pie and creating new wealth and new resources.