'Disclosure Day' and the Myth of the E.T. Saviour

Howdy,

I just watched Spielberg’s new work at the cinema on Sunday. It was a nice excuse to go out, since we usually don’t on Sunday nights, because my Mom got us some gift cards.
I always enjoy seeing movies on the big screen, but I was shocked at the pricing for 2 non-matinee tickets ($42 and change).

The film is an enjoyable, typical Spielbergian romp, complete with ‘evil shadow government,’ a bumbling male character (emasculation), female empowerment, action scenes, chase scenes, and a very nice soundtrack by John Williams. I had to look it up, but it does sound like him, he still ‘got it.’
There is a lot of suspension of disbelief in the scene with the car and the train, as far as real life physics, but overall it is a solid film, for this day and age.
I give it an 8 out of 10.

That said, there is a huge push in the narrative of this film to conform with the US GOV official narrative that the UAP/UFO/ET is ‘god-like’ and very physically advanced, with technology, and can use us like puppets. There is the demonic angle not shown, but it could be hinted at, due to their use of human subjects.

The film shows that these Visitors to our dimension or Solar System (it is not really explained their origin) are mostly physical in nature, and only rely on advanced technology to affect their reality, with nothing of intellect or even more importantly, of spirit. It is only through being abducted by these ET’s as children, that characters like Margaret are able to have (latent) psychic abilities.
It is not clear if Spielberg thinks humanity has spiritual power or not, but the film over and over focusses on the helplessness, and greed of humanity, in the face of the advanced technology of the ET, and their (intuited) superior society of empathy which (ostensibly) allows them to travel among the stars.

Scanlon, the shadow GOV/corporate antagonist, and the protagonist Margaret are only able to communicate with each other due to a physical device, recovered from the Roswell Crash in 1947.

The film seems to be showing that humanity can only awaken it’s spiritual power with the intermediary of physical nonhuman beings in physical craft, using physical technology.

In the film I feel that there is the typical 80/20% mix of soft truth, largely useless info, and hardcore disinformation and lies,. so used and beloved of GOV stooges like Richard Doty, and presumably Lou Elizondo .
The 80% truth is the fact that humanity is powerful, and does have latent spiritual ability to affect physical reality, such as psychic communication, telekinesis, faster than light travel, time travel etc. That our empathy and (intuited) soul are what is important.
The lies are that we must rely on the ET as an external saviour.
The lie is that they are more powerful than us.
Another lie is that they are just purely physical beings in physical craft, instead of innately nonphysical and spiritual beings.

The greater lie is that we cannot access the spiritual power without the (fake) god, Technology.

So that is my reading of the film.
Enjoyable, but so much propaganda.

9 Likes

appreciate the critical rebuttal of the Spielblurg’s latest propaganda flick.
your last few paragraphs were a great summary and deserve two thumb’s up.

2 Likes

Thanks for reading.
I enjoyed the film, but I also got irked at the very transparent propaganda pushing.
I think Close Encounters was a lot better in regards to keeping the Question Open.

2 Likes

Artists are our story tellers. They have artistic license to tell any story any way they see fit or are paid to create. The recipient’s understanding is limited in reference to other “stories” they’ve encountered and allowed access and do so if they possess a curious mind.
Thanks for the review since I doubt I’ll ever view the movie. During high school I worked after school running a movie projector at our local “show house” called the Isis Theater of all names. I was amazed how people paid money to see images moving on a screen. It reminded me of Plato’s cave since the room was dark showing flickering images. After Saturday matinees the movie goers walked out in to the blinding bright afternoon sun…

2 Likes

I have been a cinephile since I was a kid. I love storytelling, and story-listening :smiley:
But I think, like any artform, it can be taken too far as a passive background noise , brainwashing thing.
I like to see the different time periods, other people’s lives, stories, struggles, and pure fantasy, action, for fun, but also to learn more about human nature and to dream on my own.
To use it as a stepping stone for my own thoughts and imagination.
I do see the danger in the passive side of it.

2 Likes

I liked Spielberg’s Indiana Jones movies, but IMHO this movie did not impress. Admittedly missed the very beginning of the movie. But, brief … really! … An FBI squat team claiming chase without air surveillance drones, or even helicopters? Typical scene on the run guy goes to a motel with his girlfriend. Girlfriend escapes through the window without the men in black covering the obvious bathroom back window escape route. However, what there does seem to be is a diluted reference to MKUltra. The setting up of the ‘staged’ home scene was weird. For what’s really going on I personally preferred ‘The Adjustment Bureau’. :wink:

1 Like

I Just Watched Spielberg’s Disclosure Day | David Icke Interview

0:00 Introduction: Spielberg’s Disclosure Day Movie Clip
0:51 Host Intro & Welcome to David Icke
2:29 David Icke’s First Impressions – The Movie Is Misdirection
5:01 Why Authority Lies & Controls Perception
7:05 Movie’s Two Paths: Fear vs. Empathetic Alien Portrayal
10:24 Non-Human Force Behind Hollywood, Governments & the Cult
13:34 What Regular Viewers Will Take Away from the Film
16:06 The Big Inversion – Feds as the “Bad Guys”
19:42 “The Alien Card” – Van Braun Quote & Planned Rollout
21:57 Problem-Reaction-Solution: Aliens as the Ultimate Scam
24:31 How the Global Cult Controls Knowledge, Media & Education
28:37 Movie Plot Breakdown & Why It’s Fantasy
31:45 Why the “Hack & Release” Disclosure Could Never Happen
35:13 Spielberg’s Connections & Hidden Influences
37:17 Belief Systems as Mind Prisons – Divide & Rule
43:21 Simplistic Alien Narratives vs. True Awakening
46:08 Two Fields of Consciousness: Infinite vs. Matrix Simulation
48:30 The Human Body as a Programmable Biological Computer
51:57 Mavericks, Awakening & the Takeover of Alternative Media
55:29 Left-Brain Prison: The Addiction to Certainty
58:49 The Pathological Non-Human Force (Demiurge Consciousness)
1:06:48 Practical Advice: Redefine Self-Identity Before the Next Scam
1:11:06 Question Everything Authority Tells You
1:13:16 Outro – David Icke’s Events, Books & Links
1:17:01 Final Thanks & Sponsor Message

5 Likes

I don’t watch TV, but had access to one at the weekend. Apart from seeing a repetition of “Two Paths: Fear vs. Empathetic Alien Portrayal” I got a full dose of AI MSM narrative.

Just in One night:

  1. Blade Runner
  2. I-Robot
    and this one I hadn’t seen 3. “The Creator” – The CGI affects were incredible. An emotionally sympathetic movie about a showdown between ‘military’ Humans vs AI or even Transhumanism.

Gotta have an AI and Human kiss coz it wouldn’t be Woke would it :wink:

Plus:

Icke took a beating for his saying out loud his thoughts, say what you will about him, his tenacity is that of an English Bulldog. Where are the rest of them? What doghouse are they hiding in when the Brits so badly need them?

1 Like

Sounds like he addresses both what I said , and also the deeper implications, which are not just loss of sovereignty/tech will solve all your problems, and cultural ‘replacement’/ontological shock, but also the ridiculousness of the ‘hack and release’ narrative and also the ‘alien card’ but we all know about that here, don’t we? :slight_smile:
I will have to check that out, thanks for posting.

2 Likes

Disclosure seems like a public relations movie for acceptance of AI to run things disguised in the Alien story.

5 Likes

… I prefer the word “Hoaxclosure” or “Fauxclosure” or “Dishoaxure”. One telling thing is that those who claim belief in such a thing do not live as if it were true. If true wouldn’t we see a great deviation in behaviors of believers v non-believers. Sorry, just do not see it.

2 Likes

3 Likes

Thank you, I will look to find that video

So it wasn’t Prometheus that gave us fire?

2 Likes