Watched it, sped up. Typical DJT…me so good, him sooo bad. Only thing of any substance I saw was the brief conversation near the end about AI. But that was just him remarking how amazing it is and potentially dangerous and ‘we have to get ahead of the Chinese’ … Nothing about how we would control / regulate / do any kind of authentication. I could see mandatory on-line digital ID coming out of it as an acceptable sacrifice of freedom for safety kind of thing.
I can see why he does stay so nebulous as the lamestream media has a field day with anything tangible he says (he want’s to be a dictator type of comment). But it would be so refreshing to hear something other than generic comments coming from his mouth. Maybe they could ‘deepfake’ him saying some actual policy / actions he plans to take and he could deny it’s authenticity 
I didn’t watch the Dr Phil interview. Saw the 2 hr timeline and don’t think I could listen to the repetitive generality-speak for that long. Was there anything remotely tangible in the Phil interview?
1 Like
The Dr. Phil interview was a bit more personal, without the banter that DJT had with IMPAULSIVE. Nothing terribly different. I don’t like longer videos either but really couldn’t determine timestamp marks of interest.