FBI Raid Of Scott Ritter's Home, His 'Convictions'. Was Ritter Set-up From The Beginning? / How Do Others Play Into The Whistleblower Group?

#1

There’s something else at work here with Scott Ritter. I don’t like the guy, but recognize that something could be wrong with the entire set-up to which Ritter has been subjected.

I’m not sure his criminal convictions are bonafide. Here’s someone allegedly caught twice on-line with underaged girls, and you have Judge Napolitano still welcoming him to his program? Not that Napolitano is the guiding light, but remembering this is the man who pushed Trump to reveal the JFK documents. Trump replying that if Napolitano had seen what’s in them, he wouldn’t reveal them either. I think Napolitano is a pretty ‘clean’ guy, and partially because of his association with Trump, it tells me that there’s something amiss with what’s happening with and to Scott Ritter.

Ritter’s convictions, which have been publicly broadcasted to no end, is free and on the streets; no jail time at all that I know of. His passport in hand, until it was confiscated on a flight about to depart for Moscow. His home now raided by FBI; shades of Trump/Mar-a-lago on this one! Ritter still a welcome guest on Judge Napolitano’s program? Ritter knows something that TPTB don’t want revealed.

In peeling this onion, I’m finding Ritter, a man with a family. A big mouth, like Trump. Ritter criminally convicted, FBI raid, and still running his mouth (just like Trump). It would not surprise me if Ritter did not actually commit any crimes, and is now a target for assassination, just as Trump was, and still is targeted. The Trump/Ritter comparison is different, for obvious reasons, but have similarities that shouldn’t be ignored. I think people have made this too complicated with regard to both men and with Ritter, have swallowed the narrative bait in one gulp.

The classic tactics used by powers in such cases is #1 Threaten the lives of family members, #2 Create legal stumbling blocks that are difficult, sometimes impossible to overcome, #3 A final warning (varies) before assassination (FBI raids on both mens’ homes). It doesn’t get any more classic ‘gangland’ than this! Just as fire, floods, inflation, and over-taxing works, so do tried-and-true gang tactics. TPTB do not change what works! Why would they?

I’m not saying Ritter is a nice guy, with no history; neither is Trump, but they’re after both, IMO. Ritter knows something. His wife & daughter are the big leverage, so if they’re killed, Ritter’s a loose cannon. In Trumps’ case, he has more extended family to work with; direct family is treated differently.

Will Ritter be killed in some way? How about a sudden heart attack (like Robert Trump), an accident (like Ivana Trump), or street attack (Seth Rich), or shot outright. Ritter knows something. Why a trip to Russia? Was he delivering some kind of message? IDK. Will just have to watch and see what unfolds.

2 Likes
#2

GUeO3MgXoAAOB79
GUeO3MgXoAAOB79654×680 47.2 KB

1 Like
#3

There’s some interesting comments by Ritter in this interview. Ignore the title, as it’s not just about Israel, but also comments on DJT and if CIA is monitoring him.

I still maintain the patterns of threats of Trump and Ritter are very similar, and that Ritter might be ‘running errands’ for someone the globalists don’t want completed.

#4

There is quite a lot of important information in this video! About halfway through, McGovern mentions William (Bill) Binney, NSA Chief, cryptographer, and creator of a lot of NSA programs and I’ll let you read about his ouster, etc. Binney is now married to Dr. Katherine Horton, PhD from CERN. Both claim to have been implanted with electronics and whatnot, and under daily torture.

I think it’s highly likely that Ritter’s been threatened and no child solicitation actually took place.

Here’s conversation about Ritter.
https://www.youtube.com/live/S7qyOE1AZqQ?si=Sfm9zEXkcKp0lg-X

#5

The fact that Ritter explained that there were no nuclear threats out of Bagdad and called the whole Iraqi War a farce when he was a weapons inspector has kept him in the hot seat. There is only one side when you are talking MIC fraud.

4 Likes
#6

It’s rumored that, as a US nuclear inspector, Ritter clashed with Israeli officials over his reports on their actual nuclear capabilities and Iran’s. This may have led to his conviction for child sex blackmail, which has always seemed suspicious. In other words, Ritter may have been targeted by Mossad due to his refusal to cooperate with the Israelis, and given the ol’ Mossad special. Currently, Ritter appears to be an obvious agent of the Russian government. I’m curious to know his genealogical background and if he’s a descendant of a major bloodline. I think the danger to his life is very real and I expect that he will not escape his current situation unscathed.

1 Like
#7

In this interview he talks a bit of what happened.

#8

I thought Ritter explicitly said “did not have weapons of mass destruction…”

I remember Ritter was a former US Marine Corps major who served as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq during the 1990s. He opposed the 2003 US invasion, insisting that Saddam Hussein’s government did not have weapons of mass destruction, as Washington claimed at the time. Was it not some sort of poison gas he was using against the Kurds?

I know I am quibbling over a tiny detail here, but was there was some mention the weapons were ‘nuclear’?

2 Likes
#9

You make my point perfectly, nidster.

2 Likes
#10

Paul Craig Roberts had a video on Scott Ridder, showing why “they” were after him.
YouTube cancelled it.
Truth is an unacceptable revolutionary act, in the USSA of today.

3 Likes
#11

What isn’t a weapon of mass destruction from an American industrial complex view. If I “burb” in Europe it is considered a weapon of mass destruction!

I can’t help but think some faction wants a West angainst East powwow, you know the saying when two dogs fight over a bone the third is off with the bone. It pretty much feels like that.

2 Likes
#12

Anyone brave enough to voice the truth becomes the focus of darkness. Few have the light to radiate back.

5 Likes
#13

Even the light of the smallest candle is still, nevertheless, a Light.

2 Likes