BELGOROD 🔥
— Jason Jay Smart (@officejjsmart) May 22, 2023
Allegedly the Free Russia Legion, which fights on the side of 🇺🇦 but is composed of Russians, is invading southern Belgorod, Russia. pic.twitter.com/1O3nZHsMyi
and getting their aS/Sez handed to them. non-‘allegedly’?
ukrop(r)op. that’s what is left for them. perception management. read some real pro-stuff man:
I see. But perhaps one should try to think in historical terms. Namely, why and how the Soviet Union collapsed, not the USA and NATO. How Yugoslavia collapsed, not NATO and the USA. All of them were or still are federations. Like for example Russian Federation. Or like for example the North American Federation Which we call the USA. I suggest this as a way of thinking. Nothing more or less. No bias towards any of the parties. Simply Logical.These questions may require a multifactorial analysis. But maybe not. Maybe there is one simple thing that is still a factor that does not allow the collapse of the federation, like the USA, or the Russian Federation, or like the federations of I don’t know, Germany, Britain i.e. UK, Spain, Italy, France, etc. All of them are federations basically. Except maybe Switzerland which is in fact still a confederation. Sweden, Norway and Finland I would not discuss them here because they are slightly different social conditions and national mentalities.
if i were u, i would accept ur own advice and try to think in REAL historical not terms, but measures, not in 30some years, but in 50-100-500-5000 years.
though then one has to learn history too, which is the tricky part, since the winners write the books. u know, the difference between fake news and reality. that is something one has to grow up to. search and research, worh tirelessly and the whole will be turned upside down. betcha.
so do a little digging, diverge into it. 
one thing: one has to be honest for that. if that part is okay, the rest will follow
Thanks for the recommendations. Very kind of you. I appreciate it. But I’ve been digging for a long time on all the topics that are discussed here on this forum using exactly the ways and methods that you suggest and some other plus. I came here prepared. What I have to I say and post it will be seen. Everything in its time. I’m not in a hurry. There’s no need. I use the wisdom and philosophy and experimental findings in this scientific approach mostly by N.A. Kozyrev and N. Tesla.And plus I am very, very careful about the tact and timing of posting. I keep in mind that some minds are not yet ready for some findings ,inventions be they of a mental, psychic, physical, biological, soulbounded or spiritual nature etc , some of which are already known and or applied in everyday live and practice. That is all for now.But here is an example and for the beginning I allow myself to say that this definition is incomplete and therefore partially correct, that is, partially incorrect.
Soulbound is the property of an item that prevents it from being transferred to another character .
oh, my. just as i thought.
then just 1 question, since it was a long day and have book myself for tomorrow=today (its AM 0:30 here, Central Europe):
which one is the on verge of imploding and collapse: the USSA or the Russian Federation?
see u today. good time!
Both of them. In my opinion. But both will survive to a lesser extent, i.e.narrowed or reduced territorially and also in number and type of population. And yes it’s late, it’s time to rest. See you. All the best until next time.
Thank you for protecting my fragile and undeveloped mind…repression has its advantages.
From what I have read so far, what you have written in your comments and posts, I think that you don’t have the undeveloped mind at all maybe different, but not undeveloped. As for the fragility, the mind cannot be that. It is simply too soft to be brittle or breakable, that is, it is not stone or glass, and it is fluent, constantly. Something similar to constant plasmaflux. In my opinion anyway. In other words there is no such thing as an undeveloped mind, or a fragile one. It is just a long-standing misconception about the mind as a thing. A persistent misconception though.
I don’t quite agree with this. Repression has no advantages, and every time it collapses due to external factors and influences or collapses from the inside or due to its own weight or pressure. That is, it implodes or explodes, or simply rots beyond recognition, and disappears.
on mind:
well it seems that yours is an untrained one, as it won’t even accept the ability and possibility of being trained, or developed.
u may have read and absorbed a wide variety of teachings on many things, but it surely seems u do not practice ur mind.
and u r not able to feel the irony of Bill… thats untrained Bro, in other words ‘undeveloped’. rich in theories, poor in implementation.
i know this well, fell into it several times.
one of the fundamental distinctions, is the distinction between ‘pure mind’ (which surely does not develop or change) and ‘ordinary mind’ (which HAS to be trained and developed by practice, and may even be broken, as we see the psychotics).
u take one for the other, and do not make the needed distinction. which shows ur understanding and implementation of the teachings u learned. its like mistaking a human for God. big mistake. in writing at least for sure.
so u get into arguing, and elaborating what u read/heard on ‘mind’. since u do not understand Bill’s talking about his ‘mind’, the ordinary one.
in other words, one has to untrain his mind to do so, which is training as well.

p.s.: and yes, repression has no advantages. Nay! so i let my mind on this topic to do the job.
A disadvantage of communicating via the written word versus communicating in person or a vocal recording is the nuance and tone inflections of the spoken word to convey irony, satire, humor etc, hence I suppose the need to creation symbolic emojis…
Repression is in constant use by a civilized world otherwise there wouldn’t be a civilization and psychotherapists would go bankrupt…,
and as well the receiver’s current state of mind, which may be in an unaccepting mood of being. been there, done that. huhh. even got totally upset. cca 20some years before, when i was a freshman to internet foruming. man, that was disillusioning, but i had to have it.
what u call repression here, i would call self-discipline. which is training the mind-body.

Good.I hope that it will remain so. It is impossible to form, educate, train what is constantly changing and always fluent, and constantly subject to change, as it should be in my opinion.
Оn the contrary, I train it without pausin or taking a break. Continuously.Rigorously.
On the contrary, I felt the irony in Bill’s comment. However, I commented as if I had not felt it. Purely out of an act of kindness, to him and to others who read my comment.
Hmm. Not really. Rich in theory, and rich in everyday implementation.
Hmm. Making such distinctions, that is, categorizing the mind is a catastrophic error, primarily in the manner and method. I emphasize a grave error.
I use the comprehension technique.Very,very rarely the understandig technique.Because it requires submission, obedience, which stops the flow of the mind. And mostly obedience to authorities, and serving them. That is the pure definition of mental slavery.That is standing under something.Lowground mentality.
I have no intention of doing that. Nor do I do that.
I comprhend ‘the ordinary’ as you say Bill’s mind.
In your opinion, it might be some kind of training. But extremely unnecessary, ineffective, and redundant. In other words, useless, in terms of wasting time, resources and energy.
It is not the way, the technique or the method of the way of the mind. That way one never achieves excellence in divergence, convergence or anything else or anything else, or or anything else and so on.
Good.I hope it does the job. 
Been there done that too.About the same time period back as you.Same. 
Ок.I would call it a mental state which in Japan is called Mu, and in China Gong-Fu. That is, release, even if temporarily, or by necessity, from what Z. Freud calls the Ego.
so u decided to make a distinction on feelings, and surely feelings are not the contents of the mind… so u acted to be ‘kind’, which is a distinctive choice. hahaha. gimme some more!
which clearly shows that u r just talking about mind, and know only the ordinary one, which u use all the time to make distinctions, like between what words to use. it’s like diverging just for the sake of it. that’s sad. a theoretical and actual catastrophy.
i won’t bother with weeding out all the contradictions (‘i am untrained, and i hope it stays that way’, but ‘i train rigorously’, no distinctions on manner and methods of mind, while refuting understanding - which is an etymological construct of an existential experience as u point it out-, and calling comprehension a technique and so, and so forth…)
no, dear Bro, pure mind never changes. it’s always the same. ordinary always changes. hoho, distinction! but feel free to entangle urself into self-contradictory styled diverging.
and yes, gong-fu is hard work, on the ordinary mind/body, with chi, which is not shen and u have to make a distinction between them… or not? but you could have said praying or contemplation as well, since there is a distinction on inner and outer gong-fu in the Shin tradition, at least this is what i learnt, studied and practiced with my Chinese master.
do not forget, the soup has one taste, but needs many ingredients and a lot of work to be done.
we shall talk later, who knows when. God bless ya!
It seems that there are other bears in Russia. My mistake.
Yes there were and there are. Some may be waking up right now. I’m just guessing here. Russians are a patient people. Long in terms of time.But they always free themselves from the yoke. Either in the sense of authoritarianism, tsarist, socialist, or the current regime, which in my opinion is a combination of both.
Your Chinese master taught you well. Up to some point. But not all the way.
My Chinese master on the other hand taught me what I can’t put into words here. I can only say that he used the teaching method otherwise known as 100 eyes.
You can ask yourself if you want. Isn’t that what you are doing right now?
I have chosen to remain untrained. And comprhending is a mental technique, just like understanding.Everything else is wording.
There is no such thing.Mind is mind on it’s own.Categorizing the mind as I said is useless. Even the descriptive categorization you use,like pure mind,or ordinary mind etc.What does that mean?. Oh wait it doesn’t mean anything. It doesn’t describe or depict anything.
Not.Same thing.
There is no distinction on inner and outer gong-fu.Goong-fu is one yhe same thing being inner or outer.You just choose way to express it.Externally or internally.That is all.
Oh dear.Here we go again and again.The soup has many tastes since it contains many ingredients.It is only logical an tastefull i.e. again contains many of them tastes.
I thank you.Same to you.
Wow. Just when I was relieved that Houston and checked out.
My my, y’all extrapolated all that verbiage from one statement?
Well yes.Please make another one.
Not to mention we went way out of the post topic. 