Gloves are coming off. Looks like a slander piece on Kennedys but

even if 1 percent of the info in this show or book are true, then it portrays Kennedy boys in totally different light. Dare I say scumbags.

I have no problem that families that provided “presidential rulers of the US” are tainted in some way, shape or form, the Kennedy’s included. The decline of the empire has been going on for decades after all.

What I do find comical, that all this digging for dirt seems to serve nothing than to strenghen the most vile in power and to solidify that power! It has nothing to do with truth nor virue! Sadest part, it seems to be working too.

Ultimately, the commoner will catch up to the truth, but I don’t think they will like the brutal dictatorship that followed the stench of misplaced glee.

2 Likes

This sounds like a couple of hens cackling over and ex-wife’s bitterness to me. When pressed about the sordid tale that Jackie O kissed JFK’s penis as a corpse, she says, “oh it’s in another book!” That is her sourcing? what a sleazeball. The hawkster selling this trash gives me the skeevies, and has a gossipy air that degrades her entire presentation. MKelly wins zero awards in my book after her cover up interview of Alefantis.

Lets wait for the book, and see how many footnotes it has😉

The entire JFKjr hit piece is the weakest weak sauce ever. The entire argument was - OOoohhh he was reckless and other women got endangered what a CAD!!

Ok the guy was a handsome playboy - that is not a crime, it is a character trait but to slant it as something evil is ridiculous. Live fast die young is a motto for some people, and the people that run with them male and female choose to do it. The women around JRKjr reveled in sharing his fast lifestyle and saying things like that she “realized she got a dud” is just opinion and totally unsupported - it is just smear. Tabloid style. To sell copies. The mother-in-law did what stunt at their wedding? well FOUR years later yes there was an accident, oh the dramatic MIL was right! Ridiculous.

Chappaquidich was disgusting yes, and JFK was a sybaritic woman chaser - the smears trying to pin Marylin’s death have been debunked elsewhere and formed a massive lie in the movie Blonde which I found repulsive in the manner that JFK was portrayed and totally fallacious in some respects. Too bad, otherwise an interesting movie.

But to say that some rich powerful men in the 60s were bad boys is to describe almost every legend in politics and Hollywood that you can find - all with massive lies supporting a sparling public persona. The Kennedys were no worse than many and much better in some ways than many as well, But don’t stick that on the next generation.

Not buying the sleaze thrown at RFKjr, his fitness for office is quite apparent, just as the sleaze of the attacks on him are as well. Look up Chidren’s Health Defense and see what it actually does, and his record on the environment as well. If the author wishes to attack him find problems with his charity work - bet she can’t which is why she reverted to the complaints of an angry ex-wife , What lazy work.

1 Like

Being a great litigation attorney as RFK-J is, we should expect a defamation court case.

I think the “authoress” would love that but for him, it would just be a distraction. My bet is no, he’d take a pass.