Originally published at: GMOS, FRANKENFOODS, AND LAB-GROWN MEAT, BUT NOT IN FLORIDA
There’s some interesting news out of Florida regarding the most recent version of frankenfoods that “the elite” want all of us to eat while they continue to dine on typical human things. In the “rules for thee but not for me” universe of Baal Gates and der Hochklaus Freiherr von Blohschwab und Bloviation, while we’re…
9 Likes
This is how they trying to push it to us, with science, here below, M.D. and astrophysicist raving about tasty lab grown chicken.
Key phrase in entire video, stem cells of animal and “nutrients” compose a new kind of meat. I wonder how much of mRNA tech and lipid nanobots are in this piece of chicken.
I bet you the so-called nutrients are proprietary blend, that is patented and armed with legislative fence, so no one can litigate makers for any harm done to consumers. Question is, is it 70 years like in case of Pfizer or longer.
Oh, I almost forgot this is not lab grown meat, it is cultivated meat. This beautiful an historically important word “cultivated” for all agriculture throughout all civilizations, now is bastardized and has a new meaning. Gnosticism at its finest.
3 Likes
the implications of this are so far reaching, but haven’t been spoken about openly yet.
What are they really “cultivating”, the “food” or the consumer; the phrase “you are what you eat”, gets a whole new meaning. Will this make us all equal?
the possibilities are mind boggling, lab grown or regrown limbs, entire bodies.
The inevitable conclusion is horrifying.
Could this technology have been commissioned by noncorporeal beings, who seek to inhabit a host, without a spiritual fight. Wasn’t there a reference in Dr. Farrells book, “The demon in the ekur” and how two spirits can’t inhabit the same space/body?
I sense a none human agencies, is at work behind all of this.
And what if, this is not new technology, but a revival, Adam and Eve comes to mind,
Could this imply, that humans alive today are the result of that technology, but on a much more sophisticated level. then is admitted in the article.
Are our bodies just a refuge for fallen souls?
Humanity may have to face a serious, spiritual crisis.
2 Likes
These are serious and sensible questions, and we’ve been wondering on similar lines: Could non-human entities be steering these inhumane global agendas? And if so, how do we, as individuals address this? How are you dealing with this? (One thing we’re not doing is eating any processed stuff that the globalists are trying to push!)
Dr. Farrell’s book: Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men left us wondering about some things. I am especially fascinated with learning more about: Who was this lady “Nintu”, of ancient times, who seemed to be involved with genetic engineering? How might any of that be connected with what’s going on now? Might that even be connected with the very concept of slavery, the same way that many animals have been engineered and appropriated as slaves? Did human slavery begin at the same time as animal slavery?
What do we do with the question: Does a slave who was specifically engineered to be a slave have rights? As we’re maybe looking at this question with this inhumane agenda, where some entity thinks it has the right to do what it’s doing.
(I personally can’t buy the narratives that we’ve been given to justify exploiting animals: “animals are put here for our use”, as there is also a possible corollary: what if we were put here for some entity’s use? Does that entity have a right to do to us what we have been repeatedly been told we a right to do to animals? Most importantly: Can a strict adherence to “The Golden Rule” break slavery systems down, regardless who was put here for whatever entity’s slavery purposes? It is interesting that since ancient times, the concept of The Golden Rule pops up in many of the ancient wisdom traditions across cultures. There must be a very solid reason for this.)
4 Likes
It is hard to find the purpose behind all of the anti-human activities, if we only look at other humans and their motivations, for a cause.
For some time I thought about the relationship between yeast and the baker, and if we are as removed from our “Baker” as the yeast is from his, I think we will never learn the truth.
If the difference is less, we may have a chance at a glimpse, but for that to happen, we have to know our selves, what is our purpose, what is our station, amongst all life.
at the beginning of our existence, we resemble a fruit on a tree, not quite in the food chain and only feeding of our mother, slowly climbing up on the food chain, until death throws us to the very bottom of it, to be consumed by microorganisms.
So far, It seems clear that somebody/thing is objectifying us in the same way, we do to cattle.
Nobody ever says, I am eating cow, its steak, beef or burgers.
We have to find out the right analogue, as from cow to steak, is human to ???.
I don’t rule out ending up as a burger on some higher beings barbecue, but even by our own standards, we are sophisticated creatures and may have a purpose, beyond being food.
3 Likes
I had replied to this but see my reply was deleted (because I accidentally duplicated it?), or because someone didn’t like what I said. Too bad. My comments based on personal experience working in a regulatory office were that when the govt sets up so-called user fees, so that the industries being regulated (CDC, FDA, state level equivalents) pay the salaries of the regulators, you get captured agencies. And that my worry about genetically modified ag products is that they will be carcinogenic or even faster on goals of eugenics, not that they will make us taller. But no one listened to me 25 years ago, so why would they now?
I do agree there seems to be some entity or egregore that is governing all this desire to dehumanize humans and make them tools of the technocracy.
4 Likes
Nah, it’s the speeding up of our next level in transcendent evolution by passing the slower natural process…death.
Your thinking is deep, and it seems that you’ve been thinking about this a long time. I hope that more people explore this question like you are doing, as that kind of exploration lifts a person into a higher state of mind. I like reading your post, also how you ponder the relationship between the yeast and the baker. And then, if one removes the baker from the equation – and the yeast simply makes its own way in nature. Does the yeast even need the baker?
Although we venture into the unknown, sometimes it’s interesting to explore “what if” questions. “What if” we were engineered by some entity to be that entity’s object of use. Can we even wonder: Did that entity have a moral right to do that, to commodify another living being for some material use? To strip from that living being its own unique and individual purpose? And that opens the door to other questions. Say that entity broke a moral code (i.e., The Golden Rule), then is that entity’s assigned purpose for us really valid? Do living beings have purposes in their own rights, that transcend beyond any immoral imprint left behind by entities interested in commodifying life and turning everything into material (lifeless, soulless) objects? And, when we look at many problems in our society, can they be also traced back to the theft of the true (and I want to say “divine” here) purposes of living beings?
This book I’ve been reading lately, digs deeply into these kinds of questions. e.g., page 11, Food for Freedom (Will Tuttle):
“If we can successfully meet the epistemological crisis, and begin to trust our inner guarantor of validity—our ability to think critically, discern skillfully, and intuitively make connections— we taste the freedom of self-reliance and begin to be part of the solution to the problems facing society, instead of exacerbating them. This brings us to the next crisis, a teleological crisis. We now find ourselves stepping out of the mainstream consensus trance that gives meaning to the general population, and we are compelled to grapple with the teleology of our society, and of our life itself. What is the purpose of our human species and of our culture and civilization? What is our individual purpose for this
lifetime, if we are no longer in alignment with the official narratives, and no longer believe the official truths? With effort, we can deepen our connection with our purpose, and develop our capacity to shine the light and example of our unique life into our culture, though it may not always be recognized as such.”
2 Likes
This movement? You are what you eat…
1 Like
Bioengineered is the new touch-feely term for GMOs. I heard about this coming to the US about three years ago. The proposed logo featured a farmer on the back of a tractor. My spell checker even agrees it is now “one word.”
1 Like
If you don’t only look at lab grown meat but other things that have
huge effects on us as well, it’s quite horrific the picture that emerges.
From toilet paper and mouth wash, deodorants, toothpaste and such to make up for women ( and some “men”).
Oh my God! That is filthy business if there ever was one.
The bugs are in the food at this point, at least in EU it seems.
Apeel has been in use for years already, and Im sure there’s other poisons as well introduced to the market lately.
Hopefully we will see more businesses like “Mealbetix.com” coming up.
https://mealbetix.com/
1 Like
I read The World Peace Diet, years ago, same author. It was a disturbing book, but at that time I wanted to know more about the food system, and, like I more recently experienced with our so-named “health care system”, I came to experiencing similar shock about the “food” system back then, how much was expertly hidden from us, how much deceit in that industry, and how much ugliness. Ironically, Dr. Tuttle (PhD) wrote about the hormones and genetic engineering in that book as well, although in the book I’m reading now (his sequel to that book), delves into these issues even moreso.
Interesting your suggestion: “The You Are What You Eat” Movement. (I’m smiling, Bill).
One main point that I extract from his books is that we get back what we put out (what he refers to as “boomerang effect”). I suppose one could call it: you are what you eat. Similar idea. In both of his books (TWPD and FFF), he suggests that this modern practice of hormone injection into animals to make them grow faster for market, and the GMOs, is an endstage to an ever-progressing declining morality.
I’m glad to see people talking about the issue. In Canada, there have been Agriculture Gag laws introduced, that would make open discussions of these kinds of issues become difficult in the future.
Yes if we had to actually do the killing ourself of the animals that are the meat we eat, I’d venture to say our carnivore diet consumption would greatly decrease.
1 Like
You’ve hit on something that has perplexed me for a very long time. What seems strange is this: if animals are our intended food, why can’t some of us bring ourselves to kill them? And, why aren’t those of us who don’t eat them not dead from this non-adherence to official food narratives? (A bit like those of us refusing the vaccines or masks aren’t dead from non-adherence to official public health narratives).
Are humans the only “omnivorous” (so we’ve been taught to classify ourselves in school) species not capable of killing our food? This mystery seems to go back to antiquity (and I’m not thinking about hunters or slaughterers who have been conditioned since childhood in killing – just wondering about Martha Average like myself who is repulsed by killing and simply cannot do it). And then the puzzling chapter in Genesis 1:29, which does not suggest that GMO Frankenfoods or animals were the recommended food for humans.
Most animals in the wild know their food instinctively. We, though… there seem to be strange things going on when it comes to our instincts for food… Almost as if we have been given narratives (for 10,000 years?), for some mysterious reason, that we’ve been following, that directly counter our natural instincts. And, I’m not sure that these narratives may ever have been intended to be in our best interests…
This stuff all perplexes and puzzles me, and I’m wondering if there’s some mystery about this that goes way back, that may also be connected with the slavery question.
3 Likes
Killing an animal could be the basis for the sacrifice ritual. We know better but we are hungry and the lamb is right there…
And mass agricultural cultivation of grains was introduced, perhaps as a control mechanism…
I think about this stuff from time to time, sometimes I wonder why we have to endure so much if we are just going to end up on the barbeque. A cow surely endures much but what is it’s purpose? Why educate and enlighten a cow, what purpose would that serve?
Why do we search for meaning when a cow does not as far as we can tell from it’s daily activity.
Anyway today is my birthday, it’s a big one and I guess as I get closer to the barbeque these thoughts become much more interesting.
3 Likes
Yeah! Another year to celebrate! Happy Birthday ShadowNet…Thank you for helping in creating the universe.
3 Likes
Not your life or mine…