"He ended his message with a call for peace."

3 Likes

WAR IS PEACE.

https://rt.com/news/620165-us-joins-iran-bombing/

The USSA is inherently virtuous, especially in its wars.
They’re not for oil, or territory, or treasure.
NO!
The USSA undertakes WAR in the service of Virtues!
Democracy! Equal Rights! Women Votes! Fighting Fascism! Fighting Wrongs!
If “they” don’t progress or agree to what the USSA considers righteousness?
They’re bombed ALL To HELL!
It’s All Good!
WAR IS PEACE!

4 Likes

Apparently Iran planned for this months ahead.

5 Likes

Jeremiah 8: 11 … talking about different things of course. But it comes to mind every time I hear above message.

2 Likes

Interesting - someone was quoting Jeremiah yesterday in response to Dispensationalists saying that Israel is God’s favored people no matter what they do.

Will have to read Jeremiah again - one of my father’s favorite sources to cite from memory, which didn’t make him a welcome guest to some parties.

2 Likes

We’re praying for the safety and wellbeing of residents who are living in and near those areas (Iran, Israel, Palestine, etc., etc.,); their precious living spaces will surely be contaminated by the fallout of the bombs.

One doesn’t hear much discourse about the question of fallout for the people who live in the areas that get bombed. One brave nun who used to speak to that issue is no longer in this life.

2 Likes

It is my understanding the first three sites hit by US did not produce contamination; however, Israel hit I think it was Isfahan, and radiation contamination was reported. Different sources sometimes contradict (fog of war).

It was my honor so far in life to have known a family member of an American doctor who went with his family, to study genetic damage effects in Japanese people 2 generations after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I have known a few others involved in taking professional stands against the use of nuclear weapons, and such people sure know a great deal more on the subject than casual laypeople who think they know how “relatively harmless” such weapons are.

2 Likes

And the one; maybe from the bomb/missile, and not the site

1 Like

It was not Isfahan, but Bushehr that may have shown contamination.

1 Like
2 Likes

In this day and age more damage can be done with bombs that don’t include fallout. ‘Nuclear’ is just the type of reaction needed to trigger the bomb. It doesn’t necessarily include fallout (dirty bombs). JFK allowed this testing in 1963. It was completed and confirmed 10 years later. Dark Journalist and Dr Farrell discussed this a few months ago.

Contamination of the land doesn’t allow the victor(s) to extract the spoils of war from the ground and that’s a major reason ( but certainly not the only one) why wars exist not just today, but in the past as well. That’s not to say another event such as Hiroshima or Nagasaki will never happen again, and that’s the scary part. One just has to look around the world at the freaks jostling one another to get control of the nuclear button in various nations.

4 Likes

The Uranium shells in Iraq?
Contaminated the land; affecting ALL who lived there, and are living there.
And, what aren’t “they” telling us about other “contaminations”,
In the service of: “The better good”?

3 Likes
2 Likes

excellent! It now makes more sense the (obviously wrong) narrative put out in the US pressers ‘we completely destroyed IR nuclear program’. We did a cosmetic attack with enough kaboom to be somewhat plausible to MSM watching normies and claim success. Now IS can say ‘ahhhhh, not a threat anymore’ and come to the table (stop their nightly pummeling).

2 Likes

Thank you. I knew several doctors who were appalled at the US using depleted uranium munitions in Iraq - as anyone but a soulless incredibly wicked neocon could grasp - not only for the harm done to Iraqi civilians but inevitably also to US soldiers who served there.

Oh, but uranium doesn’t really hurt people - I forgot.

5 Likes

That notion of “clean bombs” put out by the technocrats, seems a little like the “safe and effective” injection campaign to me. It gives people a false sense of comfort in bombing campaigns.

While the media often tends to focus on technical and strategic aspects of war mongering and war theatrics, many people do feel for people and animals who are affected by bombs flying near their living spaces. I don’t believe in “clean” bombs – there will be pollution of water and soil, also from residues of the bomb clouds. And, there will be permanent psychological harm.

Our Iranian taxi driver (who escaped Iran many years ago) used to share tragic stories about his family and friends who were not fortunate to escape. He was deeply traumatised.

Recently, we viewed two short documentaries of an Ethiopian refugee living in New York, and an Iraqi photographer who survived the last round of bombs/warring, and neither man looked as if he was fabricating his personal tragic story. You can always tell from someone’s eyes, whether that person is telling truth or not. We felt their pain, acutely, just like we felt the pain of our taxi driver, and also of our family members who were in Europe during WWII, all of whom never, ever got over the bombings.

There is something about a Bomb – that leaves a residue even far more lingering than a cancer-causing chemical residue, and that is lifelong psychological trauma.

For me, personally: I’d love to see our world evolve to a point where all the bombs (of all countries) are dismantled, and whoever wants to order others to bomb/kill/harm one another, just get into a boxing ring oneself, and then box it out with the opponent, and don’t drag anyone else into it, and leave everyone else’s living spaces alone.

1 Like

I would join your crew, Sunnyboy, if only I could!

Years ago when Netflix was still a film DVD subscription service & my husband was alive, we watched Waltz with Bashir (2008), a film made by Ari Folman, who had been in the IDF when they attacked Lebanon, I have forgotten all the details of why. He was haunted by what he & his fellow soldiers had done to civilians, and yes, he’d call it PTSD.

After I read the book Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi (Iranian), we both went to see the film. We also ordered West Beirut and other films on Palestine. We were both strongly opposed to the wars on Iraq & Afghanistan - we knew they did not do 9/11. Without getting into the 9/11 conspiracy ideas (many of which contain truths), it was Wahhabi fanatics to all appearances, developed by the Saudis, who carried that out, but we didn’t dare offend our friends the Saudis.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing insights into the film and book you read. Both my husband and I are tired of hearing people salute the bombing campaigns (via media, and then people who parrot the media) without so much as making any effort to connect with people who have been affected by bombs, whether in person via conversations, or whether through books and films as you have shared.

And, I’m sorry about the passing of your husband, and hope that you are still able to connect with his spirit.

2 Likes