I am loving the vid chats about homeopathy and Dr Farrell’s feedback. What a wonderful addition to gaining information of this beloved practice. I figured perhaps starting a forum topic on this might bring more much desired information including (Edmontonsockmonkey’s) feedback. If anyone would like to share information about this very interesting healing craft I’m in. Love to watch/listen to Dr Farrell and his genius mind pulling it all together and putting it out there from his angle of perception/perspective.
4 Likes
That sounds like a lot of fun. I
I"m a Hahnemannian - there is no such thing as TOO MUCH HAHNEMANN! That’s like saying to an organist, "Aren’t you tired of Bach already? " OR to an engineer, “Gravity is soooooo 1790s”.
I"m looking forward to what Dr. Farrell is going to say about this week’s submission - I’ll bet he didn’t see this one coming!
WootWoot
5 Likes
Edmontonsockmonkey, what was extremely interesting to me is what Fortune Saint Germain mentioned on the crrow777radio website dealing w disease. I’m piecing together your info with his. He mentioned (when telling the audience about the Reckaweg homeopathic tintures) that much disease is brought upon by Luciferic and or Arimanic forces. He went on to explain that certain remedies in homeopathy are to appease these forces and inturn helps cure the ailment. I am missing some of his explanation but hopefully (I’m sure) you can see where he was going with this idea.
Thanks for keeping the homeopathy questions/comments coming 
2 Likes
Bach was a homeopath.
Then one day, he went into the woods.
He had Gnosis.
He picked various plants and intuitively surmised what each plant would do.
He plucked the leaves and flowers off the plant. Put them in fresh water. Put the water in the Sun for a time. Then bottled the potion.
He skipped the mother tincture part. Pipettes, droppers, graduated cylinders. Put the potion in a bottle along with some booze, Hahnemannian style.
He gave some of his potion to his clients and one after the other, they started to get well. Apparently, he stumbled onto a word known as vibration. And one after the other, people reported their psychological or somatized conditions started to evaporate.
Bach Flower Remedy which is now sold in a pharmacy near you combines 5 flowers that address panic attack, anxiety etc…
Apparantly, according to a Professional flautist who plays in a world class orchestra, people take Alpha blockers. Like Cardura which is for the heart because it controls the shakes when people get nervous. So you’ll find 1/2 the orchestra down at the psyches office getting prescription. It’s the dark secret that nobody talks about because modern science hasn’t figured the cure for stage performance. Bach did.
I used to hand it out to people before a performance and have seen it totally calm people down who were having panic attacks.
His methodology. seems to target deep emotional states rather than physical ailments.
This is where some person still connected to the borg says, it’s all placebo effect. To which I reply, updated your working model of the universe before it’s too late.
Of course, you can skip Hanemann and Bach and go right to Radionics.
There is a big fat Tesla coil at the center for you Tesla-arians.
Look, if you’re gonna tell me that Trump came in a time machine that Tesla invented, I’m gonna tell you that you don’t need no stinkin’ solution or dropper. Lay the plant on the machine, turn the knobs and take your medicine like a good boy.
I’ll let you highly curious and motivated individuals do the research on radionics and scalar waves.
You’ll likely find a description of it’s purported uses on Quack.com. Anything that goes against established medicine will find it’s way to Quack.com. Some consider it a badge of honor.
So Bach wasn’t just an organist. He was a mad medicine professor too.
Ok, it’s Edward Bach, an English Physician and Homeopath.
There has been at least 5 generations of remedies since Bach. That’s a good track record for snake oil.
2 Likes
Vibrational medicine : Gerber, Richard : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Chapter on Hahnemann updated
Don’t all check out the book at the same time. I have hard copy so I’m good.
1 Like
Edward Bach was not a homeopath. His methods are deductive - there is no inductive reasoning (Hahnemann) in his system. Induction is anathema to Bach and the Flower Essences.
So, if you’re saying that the Bach essences paradigm are snake oil, we are in agreement.
The little that I was able to read on the book you suggested has no Hahnemann in it, other than to mention his name.
Where did you get your information?
“Edward Bach was not a homeopath.”
Is his biography wrong online?
In 1919 he took a post as pathologist and bacteriologist at the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital.
*There he became strongly influenced by Samuel Hahnemann’s principles. He developed the seven Bach nosodes (homeopathic preparations made from intestinal bacteria), which became well-known in British homeopathic circles.
1930 did he abandon both conventional medicine and homeopathy to create the flower remedy system. You can check the Bach Centre itself, historical accounts of the London Homeopathic Hospital, and homeopathic literature.
even though Bach had previously been a practicing homeopath and the system was loosely inspired by some homeopathic ideas (especially the focus on mental/emotional states).
BTW, those Bach homeopathic preparations, not the flower essences, are still used by homeopaths today. SAme treat like with like. Bach did that before he began experimenting with Flower essences.
“The little that I was able to read on the book you suggested has no Hahnemann in it, other than to mention his name.”
He later moved away from that approach of bacteria nodisodes toward pure flower essences (plants), focusing exclusively on emotional and personality states. Hahnemann flipped it
He frames Hahnemann’s system within a broader Einsteinian (energy-based) model of medicine, contrasting it with the older Newtonian/materialist view of the body as a machine.
Homeopathy is discussed alongside other vibrational therapies such as acupuncture, Bach flower essences. Gerber uses homeopathy as supporting evidence for his overall thesis that health and disease involve dynamic energy fields that can be influenced by specific frequencies.
Hahnemann was raised Protestant but was essentially a deist
He rejected pure materialism. In his writings (especially the Organon), he described disease as a “spirit-like” or dynamic derangement of an immaterial vital force (or Lebenskraft / spirit-like dynamis) that animates the organism. Remedies act on this same immaterial principle.
They both were interested in the field of vibrational medicine although their premises came differently.
Hahnemann framed his experimental findings within a deistic, vitalistic philosophy common among some intellectuals of his time. He presented homeopathy as a rational, observation-based system, yet one that addressed an immaterial life principle and aligned with a purposeful divine order. AKA the law of Similars.
To this day, all the clinical studies of homeopathic medicine suggests it is nothing more than the placebo effect.
Therefore quoting modern science, I’d be fully within my right to say anyone taking homeopathy is a sucker. But I don’t. Because I know better. The model of allopathic vs homepathic requires two different models of understanding how the universe works and applying allopathic thinking to homeopathic thinking is utterly foolish.
Bach had reasons to move beyond like treats like. Bach had success with somatized conditions that he was unable to get with homeopathy. And while I won’t get into the why, that’s 50 more words, Bach had good reasons, solid thinking, not to treat everyone with microscopic even undetectable traces. The modern literature does show adverse reactions.
Anybody that has direct experience using either one of these or knows people that have taken homeopathy for certain conditions knows that the detox process can be painful.
Going to assume we won’t get to the radionics on the board.
The question is: to which degree is Hahnemann “tolerated”. The vast majority of “homeopathy” has kept the name but eliminated the principles and techniques. This debate has been going on literally since 1796.
My objection is practitioners using the name “homeopathy” without practicing according to its principles. These individuals usually cite the spectacular results of the Old Masters of the 19th century, but do not practice as the Old Masters did. It is false advertising and disingenuous.
And, no, Pure Homeopaths do not use Flower Essences. Their use is not inductive.
1 Like
Bach was a practicing homeopathist. He invented 6 remedies that are still used by homeopathic physicians today.
Flower Essences aren’t homeopathy. They are next level.
I no nothing about what practioners call themselves or care not if they are pure. I care if it works.
There is alot of stuff out there that would blow people’s minds.
Homeopathy is but one branch of a bigger tree. People are free to hang on to any branch they like.
1 Like
I had to rewind and play sections continuously with your comments/info on this past vidchat 
!!! Very detailed and interesting information. I can’t image what I will hear next vidchat but look forward to more learning. Thank you for bringing to light this homeopathic healing technique/craft/science / art
1 Like
Intense comments in this weeks vidchat. I’ll be listening again 3-4X to try in order to innerstand yours. Thank you for your vidchat question/comments!
1 Like