Human Body Communication Networks. A tangled TI web?

#1

I’ve recently been looking into the area of HBC, (Human Body Communication) protocols.

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) have produced a whitepaper on standard 802.15.6 which quote “aims to provide an international standard for low power, short range, and extremely reliable wireless communication within the surrounding area of the human body”.

I’m interested in what if any scholarly work has been done to identify how this network protocol and its testing could be related to the so called Havana Syndrome phenomenon that we heard about first reported in 2016.

The subject matter seems to be intentionally padded with scorn in most mainstream media outlets, for example the Vice video documentary that got some mainstream traction a few years back when there was more focus on the cases.

I thought I would open up a thread and post back as I discover more.

Be great to get input from any other Giza’s that are also interested in this.

5 Likes
#2

This is interesting. I am eager to read about what whatever you find.

1 Like
#3

Thank you Spacespeare, I am out on a limb in terms of understanding the fundamentals of what I am looking at. I start from the knowledge that systems can be modelled given a resting state or initial condition. Interesting to think that we might have a suspended state of mind in which an accurate impulse response could be measured. This is very much out of my field of study and so I am just spitballing ideas but I suspect that there may be some work going on to model the human brain. Given how keen the transhumanist cult seem to be in dragging us all into some non physical domain I cant help thinking it could be connected to this weird phenomenon.

1 Like
#5

If we are being realists then the internet of things will inevitably become the internet of beings. But I can see the use case of that, even though it will most likely be a goldmine for advertising and marketing purposes. The TI (Targeted Individual) cases that have merit suggest something more like a beta test of an interface or API with the brain. That being said the bulk of cases seem on the surface to look like schizophrenia with classic markers, but I kind of think of it like early UFO sightings. There is a ring of truth to the reports despite them being quite alien and easily dismissed.

#7

The internet of human beings would just be a hive mind. They want to model the human brain into the mold of one acceptable and controllable thought process.

1 Like
#8

This is on point, and when we get down to the hardware level, or wetware level in terms of the brain then how do we identify our MAC address? I guess the most simplistic view is that our DNA may have some kind of resonant marker that could be an identifier. I will keep looking for more information on this.

1 Like
#10

I think that is what makes us human, or at least what made us human before these monsters figured out a way to brand us with a unique identifier. Without wanting to get biblical you could almost call it the mark of the beast.

#11

Someone on this site originally posted this, but can’t remember who it was. If you can accept the computer generated voice, it has some really good information. MAC address is the subject.

2 Likes
#12

The thing is bluetooth is such a rubbish protocol that I can’t see the powers that be betting the farm on this. I get the idea though, but I think its going to be another technology.

1 Like
#15

My personal view is that whatever protocol or technology being used for brain interface would not be in the pubic domain. At this stage I am already out in la la land speculation territory so maybe time to call it a night.

2 Likes
#16

I understand not liking sign in, but I watched anyway & gained a bit o knowledge I wouldn’t have otherwise. Had to watch a couple of times.

#17

Bluetooth frequencies would be relatively easy to attenuate, targeted individuals have gone to great lengths to block these frequencies. So just saying, I think this is a dead end.

#18

It doesn’t have to be bluetooth, but the other info in workable within another interface.

#19

Could be, to be fair at this stage once you’ve had your head baked with frequencies unknown any suggestions are most welcome.

1 Like
#20

This paper has some info on RNA as a networking and storage medium.

This caught my eye relating to the biological MAC address idea.

“It is well known that genetic information is encoded at the nanoscale into deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA).”

“The extremely high density and stability of
DNA/RNA-based data storage makes it a potential solution for data storage and data transmission applications.”

2 Likes