In anticipation of the JFK document release please Mr. Trump a few more details about YOUR JFK document readings ... Trump and Napolitano possibly in a bind (see below)

#1

Who, What, When, Where, and How …
Mr Trump on exactly what day (or days) and time (or times) did you see the unreleased JFK documents? How long did it take you to read through the roughly 5000 (NYT figure of 4684 docs - still unclear whether doc = page) pages? What is/are the name/names of the person/persons who handed you the documents? What agency/agencies were/are they from? In what physical location/locations did you see and read the documents? Did you read 5000 pages of ORIGINAL / PRIMARY DOCUMENTS? Did you actually read ALL of the 5000 pages? Given your previous claims concerning your IQ (you seem to be a fan of psychometrics) what are your reading speed and comprehension / content retention / recall measures? Were ALL 5000 pages completely un-redacted? If the documents are released and they contain nothing of relevance what are we to make of your comments to Napolitano? (paraphrase) “If you saw what was in those documents Andrew you couldn’t release them either” (as reported by Daniel Liszt) If nothing is to be found in the remaining documents then either you lied to Napolitano about what you claim to have read and understood or he lied about the fact that you told him such. If you did in fact speak to him about what you had read then he either lied about what you said to him or grossly misunderstood and misinterpreted what you told him.

From a previous post … I’ll brave another prediction … there will be NO-thing of any consequence if we are actually able to see them … OR … we will see Stanton F. what Stan used to show at his talks … sheet after sheet with a readable Date at the top followed by lines and lines and lines of black redactions.

This situation does put Trump in a slight bind. If the documents are released and there is nothing of consequence there, then he has to answer for what he “allegedly” said to Andrew Napolitano. Trump has to either deny saying anything along those lines to Napolitano or he has to say that Napolitano “misunderstood” him.

but … Hope springs eternal.- from an Essay on Man, a poem by Alexander Pope

or if you prefer Latin … Dum spiro spero.

3 Likes
#2

Don’t be surprised it Trump simply unveils another movie script.

1 Like
#3

The release of the JFK files could be done carefully, and incrementally so that it creates an atmosphere of suspense in order to allow the ‘story’ to unfold slowly and methodically. Releasing them in small incremental batches could be designed to a create anticipation for the next release. Kash Patel’s confirmation hearing in the U.S. Senate was very interesting, and much of it was focused on the FBI’s deep involvement in orchestrating the January 6th demonstrations to be framed as a riot. That would provide good reasons for overhauling the FBI, other intel agencies, and to perhaps cause some early retirements, and even some indictments.

2 Likes
#4

For any discussion on what happened Nov. 22, 1963 I would suggest a viewing of Phil Godlewski’s recent film, “JFK 104” to add to the list of films already made about it! Those of us alive during that happening is becoming less & less!! Are we dismantling the very system that allowed all those k*llings to happen??? Or has another group of the 1%ers just taken over the governing of the world?! Do we even know who The Controllers of this planet are? Who owns us?! :thinking: