As one who watches geostationary satellite data daily on both NOAA and NASA websites (each has pros and cons), I long ago became convinced that weather across the world was not occurring naturally. Signs of airborne aerosol dispersal and electromagnetic radiation are obvious along with resulting effects on cloud and water vapor formation and storm duration, direction and intensity. Add to that decades of first-hand observation of skies above and decades of reading incessant climate change propaganda pieces. It is likely being done by multiple world powers; whether individually or by collaboration is speculative. No matter, as the end result has been disastrous for the environment and deadly for humanity.
Prediction alone of natural weather would require a great deal of computing power as the earth is quite large and there are innumerable variables. It seems logical that AI would be employed to better learn all the nuances and interactions from let’s say, coastal Vancouver Island and the Seychelles to Gibraltar and South Korea. That would include measurements of coronal mass ejections, volcanic eruptions and jet streams positions, etc. AI seems very well suited to observe and then predict weather worldwide.
Several years ago I watched a video in which a computer-controlled car on closed looped track taught itself to drive. Each time it ran off the pavement, it learned from the “mistake” and resumed driving. After a series of failures, it finally learned how to navigate the entire track flawlessly and at a higher speed. That now-simple demonstration was my first observation of “AI.” Now we see articles about AI becoming so powerful that it could soon control mankind.
Despite what geoengineering-deniers say about this all being just normal cycles of bad weather, I believe storms and droughts have become increasingly more frequent, more severe and more unusual in their behaviors and patterns.
My question: Is geoengineered weather now controlled by AI?