JFK Files? Paul Craig Roberts Digs Deep Into Darkness Of Deep State Coup

Basically as the CIA’s Director of Counterintelligence, Angleton said,
“As times passes, not even the CIA knows what really happened.”.
So, the JFK files are an approved fable.

5 Likes

I love Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
I have always been on the same page with him when it came to his take on economics, politics, and American history.
Regarding his most recent revelations about JFK, he gets most of it but falls short of the brass ring.
Yes, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were culpable along with Dulles’s CIA. But he doesn’t run it up the ladder. Both the Joint Chiefs and Dulles would not have acted alone without approval from “beware of the military industrial complex” Eisenhower.
Dulles and Eisenhower needed to run it up to the ladder to the oligarchs. Most obvious being Brown Brothers Harriman and the fascist oligarchs that financed Hitler through Bush’s Union Bank prior to the war; namely, Rothschild agent Morgan, Rockefeller, DuPont, and Harriman. These were in the ‘“big club” and you ain’t in it,’ crowd. The other oligarchs lined up behind them like brigades of terracotta warriors.
Still, the cabal needed the coverup. Enter Israel and the Zionist’s monopoly in media, education, and law. They did the coverup for nukes, AIPAC’s non registration as a foreign lobby, and free arms forever.
The third phone call from LBJ after the assassination went to the skullcap Dean of Law at Yale worried about things ‘unraveling?” “Don’t worry. They won’t.” Said the Dean.
Dr. Roberts is correct, Israel although had the motive they didn’t have the ability to control so many parts of the operation; and therefore, weren’t the intellectual authors of the assassination. The autopsy is just one example Dr. Roberts uses, but there are many others.
The biggest tell is the failed FDR coup. These oligarchs fingered by General Smedley Butler didn’t go away peacefully into the night. They came back, new and improved, 11/22/1963.

6 Likes

Chart compliments to Daniel P. Sheehan

Years ago during one of Giza vidchats one of the members made a post regarding JFK membership in S&B and was reading if I am not mistaken, somebody’s memoires regarding the issue of JFK trying to reveal some of the shenanigans of that secret society and paying ultimate price for it. My memory is fuzzy on details. All I remember that it made a chilling impression on me.

2 Likes

S&B is Yale.
JFK is Harvard.
Perhaps it was Bush?

1 Like

The most important files that can bust JFK wide open are LBJ’s psychiatric session notes locked away in Texas somewhere.

Yes.
In fact, I just posted on today’s blog, a reference to the Nazi International in the assassination. If truth be knowmn; there may have been some off-world reviews/influences of said assassination.
Sometimes, the answers are like Shakespear’s Horatio - beyond our imaginations.
AS far as FDR?
Webster Tarpley has him assassintated by none other than Winston Churchill!
Poisoned, I believe.

Yes I know, Like I said my memory is fuzzy on details. My general impression of that particular post was about JFK not keeping secrets of some kind of secret society he was part of it.

Talk about fuzzy memory. I remember an expose on LBJ corruption I saw on TV about Johnson’s depression, heavy drinking, and sessions, with a psychiatrist sometime between 1969-1973 and I recall he mentioned where the records are locked up. But darn it, I can’t find the place where the psychiatrist records are locked up. Grok, search can’t find it, and alludes to if it exists, it’s secret.
I’m starting to lose patience with Grok. It has the flavor of a deep state, selective search, propaganda machine.
JFK was member of the Spee Club, open to women and first black admitted in 1965.

1 Like

Daniel P. Sheehan

1 Like

Even goes into the Majestic 12 UFO files.[33:00 plus clicks in]
Thanks for the link!

1 Like

It’s awesome!
Daniel P. Sheehan is invited to the White House!
Disclosure!

Yes, FDR was poisoned by the KGB painter that paid him a visit!

For any who haven’t seen it…Phil Godlewski put out a film called “JFK 104” which is an interesting addition to the mix of theories!! Also, just rereading a bio of IKE & was surprised to read that JFK called him to Camp David after the Bay of Pigs failure to discuss what went wrong!!! It seems IKE used the CIA as one of his “tools” & seemed to control them, but things got way out of hand, didn’t they?! :scream:

1 Like

Recent discovery.
James Jesus Angelton had a mole in Russia that reported the daily CIA Presidential Briefing report was surfacing in the Kremlin. Angelton, marked the next briefing that went to only 7 and discovered the leak was JFK. TREASON
The coup d’tat was born. Dulles informed Eisenhower, and the players were assembled, J. Edgar Hoover, LBJ, Secretary Service, FBI, CIA, mafia, and the zionist monopoly of the press, finance, education, for the coverup. The checkmate being “shut up, stand down, or if the truth be told it’s nuclear war with Russia.”

1 Like

Well.
I REALLY enjoy that speculation!
Why?
Because, I Never thought of it!
Always, love high-octane speculations!
That give me “pause”.
Meaning; I’ve got to find my thinking cap - it’s somewhere around here.
When I find it; I’ll get back.

It’s not my speculation.
The story comes from Jim Manning, 50 year plus JFK researcher.
His work is known as “Patriotism Unhinged.”
It sure fits all the pieces to the puzzle quite nicely.
Angelton to Dulles, to Eisenhower, to Rockefeller, and the military industrial oligarchs, to Hoover, to LBJ, to Secret Service, to CIA, to mafia, to those disgruntled Cubans, to Zionist cover in main stream media, education, finance, Hollywood, to the “magic bullet,” to “we saw his head move violently forward” silliness.
Everything fits.
I remember talking to Robert Trump about JFK when I was tagging along with Jim Dolan in 1970. Robert said flat out “Eisenhower” did it.

1 Like

I understand.
I consider it an interpretation.
Facts are facts; it’s the interpretation of them, where many go wrong.
He may be right; however, I consider his viewpoint - an interpretation.

Come on…that Presidential briefing story should be easy to confirm.
Check it out and see what you find.
Thanks in advance.

Sure it is.
But, it then gets down to:
He said/She said.
Do you believe ALL that they tell us.
And again, they may believe it to be true. But, that’s the way they interpreted what actually happened. One could see the exact crime scene, and come up with different clues; all pointing to Colonel Musturd in the Lobby.
Anyhoo, appreciate your views, as they are not mine. Remember, that’s what I truly enjoy;
different viewpoints! Vive la difference! [with a qualifier: man/woman] - no wokeus-pocus, please!