Originally published at: JUST ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL: THE SAD END OF JASON ARDAY
On Monday, August 10, I blogged about the story of Cambridge don Jason Arday, who appeared to have concocted an academic career out of thin air, and a heck of a lot of plagiarism: CAMBRIDGE: THE EDUROT HAS REACHED STAGE FOUR TERMINAL LUNACY There has been a development - a sad one, it turns out…
5 Likes
No doubt Jason Ardey was a victim, but how many victims did he made within his privileged status? This is the evil of implementing uterly nihilistic agenda’s at large on societal fabric and institutions. It is sadly very effective.
2 Likes
and ‘this’ (Doc’s citing him on his family and private life) is why I think, that it was no suicide.
and: the story about the young athlete in the mediaeval history class shows a real teacher and pupil connection, where both sides know the circumstances and act accordingly. academia is not the institution, but the people. fake people consist fake academia, and when the mask falls, it rapidly ages and disintegrates when hits the ground, so you won’t see the enablers signature openly, only on the dusty papers of the college, since it’s quite hard to follow an undercurrent of invisible helping hand(s) on the digital format. that type of investigation will(?) be done by the academia and not the police and won’t be openly discussed at all. so the grift can go on…
1 Like
…and currently the murder is under narrative control.
At least he could read a write.
So no American ties.
The “SYSTEM” is guilty on so many affronts…
It’s difficult to find even one that’s escaped extraterrestrial capture.
The point being, it is so NOT human, so out of this world.
This digital totalitarian “system of control” may as well be an alien invasion.
So against Human nature.
That some are labling it an extinction event
Jason symbolizes an extinction narrative - “in progress”.
No surprise that Jason was caught-up in a system - BASED UPON FRAUD!
Too bad his [kn]no[w]-dissertation; wasn’t based-upon: the fraud he relied upon.
The system is good at removing & pruning away eyesores.
DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.
The mere presence of Jason - did just that!
There is a mafia that monopolizes trash removal.
Another symbol of the system - monopolies galore!
Murder maybe a sin. BUT, COMPET1TION is surely one.
AND, REGULATION is another one.
Meanwhile - Narrative control is in charge.
With no compet1tion and/or regulation, to set the story straight.
The SYSTEM IS FRAUD…
Afterall…
Is said and done.
I don’t know why but this article, post, blog of yours Doctor JPF produced the following equation of words in my mind:
Useless eater + temporal retrocausality = P (poof = non-existence)
I really don’t know why, this is how I thought about this blog of yours…
So I’m just saying…yes that is sad, but anyway 
Imagine the infamy of being the person who maims and destroys untold billions… they wold actually be a hero to many.
2 Likes
Yees, yees, and imagine being a songwriter and singer of song that promote exactly that…murder and maime…
… Sorry, not going along with allowing “victim” status. He knew exactly what he was doing the ENTIRE time.
3 Likes
I agree he knew what he was doing. A victim of childhood trauma that keeps the system of abuse going and or indeed a full blown psychopath. I am not a believer in today’s version of victimhood, I leave that to the lefties and hollywood stars.
1 Like
Thank you for sharing your own “Arday” experience, and how you dealt with that. Hopefully that intervension was able to steer the young man into exploring his interests and land him in something more in tune with his talents.
This sad consequence of living a lie (in order to grasp at an illusive “power”) reminds me a little of some insights from C.S. Lewis’ 1944 book: The Abolition of Man (undoubtedly inspired by Marlowe’s Faustus, when he wrote his insights):
… It is like the famous Irishman who found that a certain kind of stove reduced his fuel bill by half and thence concluded that two stoves of the same kind would enable him to warm his house with no fuel at all. It is the magician’s bargain: give up our soul, get power in return. But once our souls, that is, ourselves, have been given up, the power thus conferred will not belong to us. We shall in fact be the slaves and puppets of that to which we have given our souls. … The real objection is that if man chooses to treat himself as raw material, raw material he will be: not raw material to be manipulated, as he fondly imagined, by himself, but by mere appetite, that is, mere Nature, in the person of his de-humanized Conditioners. (p.72)
…
…The process which, if not checked, will abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats no less than among Fascists. The methods may (at first) differ in brutality. But many a mild-eyed scientist in pince-nez, many a popular dramatist, many an amateur philosopher in our midst, means in the long run just the same as the Nazi rulers of Germany. Traditional values are to be ‘debunked’ and mankind to be cut out into some fresh shape at the will (which must, by hypothesis, be an arbitrary will) of some few lucky people in one lucky generation which has learned how to do it. The belief that we can invent ‘ideologies’ at pleasure, and the consequent treatment of mankind as mere υλη, specimens, preparations, begins to affect our very language. Once we killed bad men: now we liquidate unsocial elements. Virtue has become integration and diligence dynamism, and boys likely to be worthy of a commission are ‘potential officer material’. Most wonderful of all, the virtues of thrift and temperance, and even of ordinary intelligence, are sales-resistance. (p. 73-74)
…
…Man’s conquest of himself means simply the rule of the Conditioners over the conditioned human material, the world of post-humanity which, some knowingly and some unknowingly, nearly all men in all nations are at present labouring to produce. (p. 75)
I concur…I don’t think he was a victim either. I merely think the greater culpability lies with the enablers.
5 Likes
And the enablers conducted their experiment outside of laboratory conditions, unless one considers educational institutions laboratories.
1 Like
ironically these institutions will scream the loudest about ‘safeguarding’ yet where was the safeguarding in this instance? if you were a conspiracy theorist type of person and prone to crawling to the very tiny tips of the speculation twigs, you might be forgiven for thinking that there was some sort of extreme discretely well managed ‘anti-safeguarding’ going on behind the scenes