Kievrus, vikings and the khazars

Geopolitics
#1

More facts/theories about how Swedes/vikings are the hidden hand and used proxy cultures to stay hidden for a long time.

To avoid sharing to many links i will copy paste alot of text from different articles.
The first is about old history books telling that vikings (Swedish)founded Kiev and Russia as a nation.

" For four centuries, Vikings held sway over parts of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, with the greatest expansion happening under Prince Oleg the Prophet.

The historical people known as Vikings, who hailed from Scandinavia in Northern Europe, are well-known today for their exploits in the west. But the merchant-warriors also made their way into Eastern Europe, where they helped found a medieval federation in territory now known as Belarus, Ukraine and part of Russia. Their loose federation of principalities called Kievan Rus survived for nearly 400 years, finally collapsing during the 13th-century Mongol invasion.

Early Scandinavian settlements in the East

Vikings founded Kievan Rus in the mid-9th century, but Scandanavian settlements in Eastern Europe actually date back to at least A.D. 750. This is when pre-Viking-Age Scandanavians likely settled the northwestern Russian town of Staraya Ladoga (or “Old Ladoga”), across Lake Ladoga from what is now Finland. One of the artifacts archaeologists have unearthed from the city is a talisman with the face of Odin, the Norse god of war.

(from history dot com)

Then i want to cross reference this to a text about the khazars from Wikipedia.

" The vast empire of the Khazars included peoples of very diverse origins and their heads and chiefs held the ruling title of [khagan] .

The Khazars were a religiously tolerant people. In particular, they kindly received the Jews expelled from [Constantinople]who contributed to improved trade and induced the leading dynasty of the seventh century to adopt [Judaism]. The Khazar Empire became a buffer state between Christian [Byzantium]and the expanding [Muslims]and played a significant role in trade between the [Orient] and [Europe]. The Vikings also came into contact with the Khazar Empire.

In the 9th century, however, the Khazar Empire declined and [the Kievan Empire] under [Sviatoslav inflicted a severe defeat on the Khazars in 965. A last remnant of the empire that remained in the Crimea was destroyed in by the Kievan Empire and the Byzantines in conjunction."

So the khazars ran into the Vikings and then became this super powerful entity that rules the world?
While at the same time the Vikings who never really lost their military dominance just disappeared and became good Christians?

If you know anything about proxy warfare then something stinks about the history of the Vikings and their relevance in the globe power structure.
Esp since Sweden became one of the most powerful empires after and then a few houndred years later is neutral and can just benefit on all sides in all conflicts.

3 Likes
#2

its not secrete what happened to Russia, predominantly as earthly genetics is melting pot among Vikings and Slavs plus later mixed by expansion with Turko-Mongolean Cultures, still as spiritual genetics russians became Orthodox Christians and stayed such what actually is the prime mark of some society that keeps the cohesion coz every other cultural cant bring imperial stature nor secure devoted defense, the problem appear tho when Russia started to open up for western influence when various neopagan trends started to pour in what culminated with khazarian causality i.e. the earlier pushing out of khazars from black sea (an persian-turkich meltingpot) in europe [1][1] came back through bolsheviks as teuton’zionist plot against Russia [2] successful most probably coz the infiltration of freemasons and jesuits as recidives from the wide westernization trends in romanticism ~ which actually started economically with godunov and reached its zenith in romanticism along the intermixing with teuton royalty [3][3] what would be probably another way in to/fot eventual presence of kaisers troops at the winter palace in 1917 [3][3] anyway after that the later inertia became globalist experiment that luckily first got independent (think solely coz been atheistic) which eventually after one century got dismantled ~ what yet again is leading Russia to Monotheist causality …

So in my opinion any elitism as victorious is tied to spiritual genetics per’se than anyhow earthly ethnic or tribal one, which on other hand is used by freemasons since enlightenment era for easier divide&conquer through the concept nation as repackaged divide’et’impera skim i.e. so through manufactured nationalism would be loosen Monotheism, and on other hand later when the same is needed to be deconstructed is pushed tribalism ~ thus we can put eventual viking hype in this context too, but even then if ethnography is consulted think that in the traditional customs of russians will be found more slavic than viking motifs now, and finally the language is last frontier that dont allow alignment to any true viking hype (which actually after romanticism is standardized as teutonic vibe) what dont means cant be found in such minset some new’age’tweaked elites in Russia but even such pop up to what would hold so would prevail - is it protestantism or maybe aryanism hek even runic vibe to be implanted will fall off due to the True Orthodox Christian causality of Imperialism, actually its possible as meddling through freemasonry that is still active there but such elites would hardly get mass support btw it would be very hard for third time to be spinned such momentum as what earlier happened in romanticism when the enlightenment trends consumed the elites in Russian Tsardom or reenter through bolsheviks in other form day after, aside that that was heavily subsidized process for prolonged time, to which eventually nowadays could be compared the globalist kgbt&transgender skim for loosening Grace of some state and like that making it more vulnerable, but as we are seeing Russia is recognizing this spin and luckily recently suspended homosexuality as “freedom” hype, and now it only needs to awaken as Blessed by The Church Tsardom so would become tougher than though …

#3

I know its not a secret, but the history of Vikings and Scandinavian history i general is very downplayed in the general conversation of the world and power structures.

Alot of people know they raided Britain and other parts of Europe for a long time.
But once they had married into most Royal families (children of Rollo and others)
They just choose to become christians and give up their pillaging and plundring?

It makes no sense esp since Sweden became of the big Empires in Europe a few houndred years later.

What im suspect is that they actually infiltrated christianity and became its ruler while still practising their own pagan ideas.

Then the have just used different mascs or fronts to continue with their slave trade and other viking related activities.

For example vikings somewhere became pirates that in time became the various Shipping empires like the East India Companies and similar.

If you ignore the names and fancy outfits there is not much difference between a Viking warlord and the owner of a shipping merchant company.

They both transport various goods (slaves,drugs, gold or whatever) and they both have private armies and their main allegiance is to themselves, not any specific country.

Sadly alot of the research ive done is not in English, and alot of it is hard to translate.
But i will try to add more substance to this thread.

1 Like
#4

I’ve heard rumours about this family, could be something to it…They’re quite the movers & Shakers… Wallenberg family - Wikipedia

#5

Khazarians as well… so it is nice to peddle about the all-knowing Swedens, but maybe they forgot to sweep their courtyard?

#6

now this is something different i.e. the eastern melting pot is one thing while the western completely different, so if eastern joining the slavs became russians the “western” joined with teutons and became part of the german ethnicum as spiritually so as culturally, the difference was that coz the fresher imperial roman lineage teuton might was risen higher thus You can see them now as norse substratum of teutons for what there is one nice theory [1][1] while eastern line altho merged with slavs and like that succeeded the earlier pelasgian causality of slavs as spiritually so as culturally [2] but coz there was imperial gap by greek cultural interference in Byzant as ethnonym russian rise above the slav roots as title … thus theoretically altho we can search for common viking denominator defacto the same cant be infused now even they wanted too ~ eg. take earlier Prophet Noah sons or later Japhets … simply it dont adds to such simplistic math, altho as always coz whatever interests alliance were possible eg. nowadays how would explain russian and chinese cooperation … think that in essence is word for spiritual vibe and once some ethnicum accepts some slowly but surely is glued to the same vibe even when coz whatever interests the elites want to broaden the scope eg. the wide westernization of Russia in romanticism that still even after all effort evaporated by Our Almighty Lord Providence [3] and again bringing back Russia to its Orthodox Christian roots …

the strange thing with teutons tho is that accepted ashkenazi jews (khazars) once they were pushed out by byzantines and russians, even merged with “their” esoteria as neopagan western elites, and solely coz that now “they” are one body altho defacto different ethnicums still coz made syncretization dont chase same eschatology but teutons are after own specific freemasonic one, while zionist messianists after own still rowing in same n’w’o ship, and if this was done solely as cultural political or economic merger but not spiritual one surely would not reach the current euroatlantic determinism altho the same numbered merging circumstances probably led to the joint esoterical remixes!

#7

Yeah the not in English and trying to translate sure made it hard for me when researching the Sw**s.