Martin Armstrong Hits A Home Run Again

#1

Couldn’t agree more with his article. Get the heck out of UN and use eminent domain on their building!

4 Likes
#2

For these actions[read article];
“The United Nations should be terminated and thrown out of New York!”

2 Likes
#3

If there are still countries that want to belong to this gang, let them go elsewhere to have their meetings and games. Those countries who refuse to join their gang treat them as terrorists. A real gangland war, finally real entertainment!

#4

In reality.
They’re what they’ve always been.
Rockefeller $hill$.

1 Like
#5

So that’s why Rockefeller donated the land to build their clubhouse in New York City?:joy:

1 Like
#6

Ah, so this is the basis of the British claiming extradition for Americans criticizing their destruction of Albion.

1 Like
#7

Brief summary of the article for those not wanting to plow through article, very important information. Thank you, Bill. Good find.

  • The United Nations has approved its first International Cybercrime Treaty, despite objections from tech companies and human rights groups. The author argues this treaty is highly dangerous and aims to establish the UN as a de facto world government.

  • The treaty claims to address cybercrime but is actually about censorship and expanding the UN’s power. It would allow for worldwide electronic surveillance and prosecute crimes committed via computer systems internationally, potentially silencing free speech.

  • The author contends the treaty is vague and open to self-serving interpretations, enabling countries to prosecute whatever they deem a crime. This could lead to the suppression of human rights, with the UN knowing the clauses are subject to wide interpretation.

  • The treaty would abandon principles of global human rights, including freedom of speech and expression. It seeks expansive jurisdiction for crimes, similar to Britain seeking to extradite an American for criticizing the government.

  • Governments feel they’re losing power and may become authoritarian and tyrannical, seeking to punish criticism rather than address its causes. The author cites examples of fines for mocking politicians and warns free speech is dying.

  • China and Russia are likely to refuse to honor this treaty. If accepted by the UN General Assembly, it would move to ratification by individual governments. Any American representative agreeing to it would be violating the Constitution and surrendering sovereignty.

3 Likes