Mullins deals with the “Jews” and their corporate machinations in detail across multiple books. I get the distinct feeling you’ve not dealt seriously with his work.
Pardon me, but is this an extension of you comment in which you attempted rebuke of Bill and my conversation?
Conflict is within human nature. While we all attempt to be civil we are also charged with specificity. Without categorical accuracy we are left with post-modern categories of the mind; in effect what you propose is quite literally the weapon of the ‘wealthiest’ to whom you ascribe cause.
If ambiguities are of interest then may I suggest The New York Times. Please do not imply we should limit our lexicon to fit your preferences – we’ve come here specifically to avoid such a scenario.
Best wishes.