As a fairly recent widow, I found this rather appalling - sure some people need a bit of medical help dealing with grief and loss of a spouse, parent, child, or another person close to them, by medicalizing these drug companies stand to make vast profits as insurance companies can now be billed for treating the “grief disorder” and patients risk being put on drugs for years instead a few weeks until they can cope with their situation again. Basically, I fear they are making a temporary situation (for most people) permanent and a disease to be treated rather than a great emotional upheaval that may not stop at the one-year mark but that doesn’t mean it is a disease either.
From Zero Hedge
snip (from the article)
he latest edition of the DSM, psychiatry’s “bible” of mental disorders, features an entirely new one: excessive grieving for a deceased loved one.
The NYT reported over the weekend that the inclusion of the new “disorder” marks an end to a prolonged debate within the field of mental health, prompting researchers and clinicians to view intense grief as a target for medical “treatment”, aka the prescribing of psychiatric medication, which would likely lead to a financial windfall for pharmaceutical companies. The disorder’s inclusion in the DSM-5, the latest edition of the manual, means insurers can be billed for the medication.
The new diagnosis, prolonged grief disorder, was designed to apply to a narrow slice of the population who are incapacitated, pining and ruminating a year after a loss, and unable to return to previous activities.
Its inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders means that clinicians can now bill insurance companies for treating people for the condition.
,Snip
