I’m utterly sick of them all, esp. this one after USMCA. Just disgusting…
Next on Trump’s 2024 list: An out-of-the-box running mate (msn.com)
I’m utterly sick of them all, esp. this one after USMCA. Just disgusting…
Next on Trump’s 2024 list: An out-of-the-box running mate (msn.com)
Give me a break. Trump is 78 now. He is in his 80’s in 2024 and will run for something? Not happening. They will correct the 2020 treason and then work from there. He surely isn’t going to run in. 2024 but he may be pointing to people who might.
USMCA is more complicated than simply pointing to New World Order “stuff”. Buffering the US from South America and Russia is not all that bad of an idea. Surely getting rid of the Communist to the North and working with the mineral rich country to our south is not the worst idea. You keep bringing it up so I guess you will disagree.
I agree that it’s idiotic that Trump would go for it at his age, but then, there was Reagan. I did not post the article in support of Trump; he and all the rest (all sides) should be in jail.
As for USMCA, you didn’t read it like we did, so your opinion is not a truly informed one. You make assumptions based on what you’ve heard and your own speculation and are free to do so…for now.
Hey, guys, Never say Never!!! Sure, Trump is part of the Elite, but in every group there are ‘factions’. Not every person can be ‘pigeon-holed’ into being the same as the ‘whole’. So, start thinking…who was vilified at virtually every turn? Who was mocked by virtually every pundit regardless of their political leaning? And, who was given a 95% to 99% chance to be the next POTUS in the last [s]election?
Who do most folks trust now days, and would vote for ‘AGAIN’?
In every cycle there is a winnowing process, and the person who comes out on top in the primaries will go through the nomination phase. The person who gets the most votes in that phase will represent the ‘party’, and their name will appear on the ballot. Just consider what Trump did after he was shunned by the ‘party’, and then had to pay for, and held his own convention, remember it now?
Now forgetabout ‘age’, and think a different, smarter way… Would the guy who upset, and shunned every conventionally held opinion about the political process, make the same mistakes again?
The really ‘key’ question to be considered is who would be selected to be on the ‘ticket’ as the 2nd person? I will promise folks this, it will not be some weak-kneed, person of little interest. That is where the primary concern should be. ‘WHO’ will that be, that is the real question. Now, that could very well be a person not even of any concern in the NEWZZZZ at this time. 'Could be a total surprise. So, expect the unexpected to happen. 'jus sayin