Please say it isn't so...mandatory euthanasia approved under 9th.Circuit Supreme Court ruling

#1

So it has finally happened, mandatory euthanasia if it is termed a “public health intervention” Slight of hand by Supreme Court to leave the WHO with carnival like hoopla, but then only have the WHO powers under “public health emergency provisions” institutedanyway. Under this, scamdemic jabs that kill/maim/debilitate permanently, may be defined mandatory and may be administered for the “public health” common good.

But that is just the doorkicker. You use imagination to picture what others measures could be defined under this precedence. Here’s one, dissidents in former and Stalin’s USSR, defined as psychiatrically ill, the more dissident, the more insane and the closer to a terminal medical treatment they were prescribed to be situated.

This Public Health emergency powers precedence now “trumps” all other rights.

https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/2056556350507819046?s=20

2 Likes
#2

“Since all these people are suffering, the humane action is to euthanize them.”

#3

I always suspected the Supremem Court Was INHUMAN.
Now there is not a shred of doubt.
If you have a heart; the Supreme Court will not have you anywhere on their premises.
To avoid contanimation.
I wonder if the Members of the Court are up-to-date on the anti-human vaccines.
Do they check regularly the NINE - for a Heartbeat?

Even a conscious, is an extreme liability on the Bench.
They’re working on the GOD vaccine though.
The Bench will make it MANDATORY; especially for the NINE.

1 Like